Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

8. Opinion evidence

View through CrossRef
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts. This chapter explores an area of evidence law dominated by expert witness evidence and the extent to which flawed testimony leads to miscarriages of justice. Expert evidence is now commonplace in criminal and civil trials, and the courts and Parliament have developed procedures to ensure that it is of high quality. These are an eclectic mix of common law and statute and their development reflects the importance of scientific expertise. It is necessary to be familiar with the differences between expert and non-expert opinion evidence and on when and in what circumstances both types are admissible and questions that can be asked of the expert whilst giving evidence. The approach depends on whether the question relates to civil or criminal trials.
Title: 8. Opinion evidence
Description:
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions.
Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts.
This chapter explores an area of evidence law dominated by expert witness evidence and the extent to which flawed testimony leads to miscarriages of justice.
Expert evidence is now commonplace in criminal and civil trials, and the courts and Parliament have developed procedures to ensure that it is of high quality.
These are an eclectic mix of common law and statute and their development reflects the importance of scientific expertise.
It is necessary to be familiar with the differences between expert and non-expert opinion evidence and on when and in what circumstances both types are admissible and questions that can be asked of the expert whilst giving evidence.
The approach depends on whether the question relates to civil or criminal trials.

Related Results

Following Leaders
Following Leaders
The question of leadership is connected to many central debates in democratic theory. In this chapter, the focus is on leadership in terms of beliefs, not desires. Opinion leaders’...
Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence
Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence
Abstract Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence gives an authoritative commentary on the fundamental principles and underlying logic of criminal evidence laws. ...
Evidence Concentrate
Evidence Concentrate
Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what ex...
Murphy on Evidence
Murphy on Evidence
Murphy on Evidence is firmly established as a leading text for use on undergraduate law courses and in preparation for professional examinations. Frequently consulted by judges and...
Communication
Communication
The exercise of political power in late medieval English towns was predicated upon the representation, management, and control of public opinion. This chapter explains why public o...
The Reconstruction Era
The Reconstruction Era
As the sole purveyors of news and opinion, Reconstruction-era newspapers bent and spindled American public opinion with little regard for independent journalism and great regard fo...
The Matter of Facts
The Matter of Facts
How biases, the desire for a good narrative, reliance on citation metrics, and other problems undermine confidence in modern science. Modern science is built on expe...
Management of Sickle Cell Pain
Management of Sickle Cell Pain
Abstract While sickle cell disease (SCD) is uncommon in Europe and North America, SCD patients presenting for pain account for an outsized and prominent proportion o...

Back to Top