Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Randomized Study of Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Persistent Uveitic Macular Edema

View through CrossRef
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of Bevacizumab IVT in the treatment of persistent uveitic macular edema Methods: This is a prospective randomized interventional study of 20 eyes of 20 macular edema patients with different types of uveitis in remission but persistent to conventional therapy who were treated with Bevacizumab IVT, with short- and medium-term results collected and analyzed. Results: The improvement in VA was significant as early as week 12, and at 12 months reached 80%. The mean logMAR VA was initially 0.78. After 1 year, it decreased to 0.57. 16 patients (80%) had at least 2 lines of VA gain at 1-year follow-up. Reinjection was required in the majority of cases. 8 patients (40%) had a 2nd IVT of Bevacizumab and 5 patients (25%) had 3 IVT of Bevacizumab. After one or more IVT of Bevacizumab, the improvement of at least 2 lines of VA at 12, 24 weeks and 1 year were 45%, 60% and 80% respectively. 65% of our patients had a central macular thickness <300 μm at 1 year follow-up. The mean central macular thickness was initially 546.55 μm, after 1 year of follow-up, the central macular thickness was 369.95 μm. After 3 months of follow-up, there was a reduction of at least 60 μm, and after 1 year of follow-up, the reduction in central macular thickness was at least 100 μm and this affected 65% of patients. No serious ocular or systemic side effects were observed. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent uveitic macular edema well tolerated, with short- and medium-term improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness in a significant number of cases.
Title: Randomized Study of Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Persistent Uveitic Macular Edema
Description:
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of Bevacizumab IVT in the treatment of persistent uveitic macular edema Methods: This is a prospective randomized interventional study of 20 eyes of 20 macular edema patients with different types of uveitis in remission but persistent to conventional therapy who were treated with Bevacizumab IVT, with short- and medium-term results collected and analyzed.
Results: The improvement in VA was significant as early as week 12, and at 12 months reached 80%.
The mean logMAR VA was initially 0.
78.
After 1 year, it decreased to 0.
57.
16 patients (80%) had at least 2 lines of VA gain at 1-year follow-up.
Reinjection was required in the majority of cases.
8 patients (40%) had a 2nd IVT of Bevacizumab and 5 patients (25%) had 3 IVT of Bevacizumab.
After one or more IVT of Bevacizumab, the improvement of at least 2 lines of VA at 12, 24 weeks and 1 year were 45%, 60% and 80% respectively.
65% of our patients had a central macular thickness <300 μm at 1 year follow-up.
The mean central macular thickness was initially 546.
55 μm, after 1 year of follow-up, the central macular thickness was 369.
95 μm.
After 3 months of follow-up, there was a reduction of at least 60 μm, and after 1 year of follow-up, the reduction in central macular thickness was at least 100 μm and this affected 65% of patients.
No serious ocular or systemic side effects were observed.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent uveitic macular edema well tolerated, with short- and medium-term improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness in a significant number of cases.

Related Results

Factors affecting the visual outcomes and central macular thickness in diabetic maculopathy after intravitreal bevacizumab
Factors affecting the visual outcomes and central macular thickness in diabetic maculopathy after intravitreal bevacizumab
Objective: To assess the outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab in patients of diabetic maculopathy by anatomical outcomes and best-corrected visual acuity, and to assess the prognos...
Anterior segment changes in nonproliferative diabetic patient with macular edema treated by intravitreous bevacizumab injection
Anterior segment changes in nonproliferative diabetic patient with macular edema treated by intravitreous bevacizumab injection
Currently, intravitreal bevacizumab is widely used for patients with intraocular neovascular disorders and macular edema. There are few studies about the effects of bevacizumab on ...
Intravitreal bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and 1 mg triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with bilateral diabetic macular edema
Intravitreal bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and 1 mg triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with bilateral diabetic macular edema
AIM: To Compare of intravitreal bevacizumab and intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with bilateral diabetic macular edema. METHODS: In this retrospective c...
Early avastin (Bevacizumab) Administration for acute retinal vein occlusion: A key strategy for improved patient outcomes.
Early avastin (Bevacizumab) Administration for acute retinal vein occlusion: A key strategy for improved patient outcomes.
Objective: To find the mean change in BCVA and CMT after intravitreal injection Avastin administration in patients with acute retinal vein occlusion with macular edema. Study Desig...
Reflux after intravitreal injection: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study
Reflux after intravitreal injection: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study
Purpose: To investigate the intraocular pressure and conjunctival thickness changes following the intravitreal injection Methods: Sixty eyes of 60 patients having intravitreal inj...
Immediate Effect of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection on Intraocular Pressure
Immediate Effect of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection on Intraocular Pressure
Purpose:  Raised intra ocular pressure following intravitreal Bevacizumabis a potential side effect which can be clinically significant. The aim of the study was to evaluate short ...

Back to Top