Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Trickle-down effect of benevolent leadership on unethical employee behavior: a cross-level moderated mediation model

View through CrossRef
PurposeConducting research on the relationship between benevolent leadership and unethical employee behavior can help us find solutions to reduce unethical employee behavior. This paper also discusses how the benevolent manager leadership can be transmitted to the employee's unethical behavior through the benevolent supervisor leadership and the moderating effect of LMX and ethical climate.Design/methodology/approachThrough a questionnaire survey of 406 pairs of leaders, supervisor and employees, the authors use data aggregation test, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics and multilevel model (HLM) to test our hypothesis.Findings(1) Manager supervisor leadership is negatively related to unethical employee behavior, (2) benevolent supervisor leadership mediates the relationship between benevolent manager leadership and unethical employee behavior, (3) LMX positively moderates the relationship between benevolent manager leadership and benevolent supervisor leadership and moderates the mediating effect of benevolent supervisor leadership, and (4) ethical climate positively moderates the relationship between benevolent supervisor leadership and unethical employee behavior and moderates the mediating effect of benevolent supervisor leadership.Originality/valueFirst, based on previous studies, this study further proves that benevolent leadership is a popular positive leadership among the three dimensions of paternalistic leadership that extends its influence to unethical employee behavior. Second, the study traces the source of the benevolent leadership of employees' supervisors and reveals the action mechanism of how benevolent manager leadership affects unethical employee behavior (trickle-down effect). LMX and the ethical climate provide the organizational context of the trickle-down effect and the occurrence of unethical employee behavior.
Title: Trickle-down effect of benevolent leadership on unethical employee behavior: a cross-level moderated mediation model
Description:
PurposeConducting research on the relationship between benevolent leadership and unethical employee behavior can help us find solutions to reduce unethical employee behavior.
This paper also discusses how the benevolent manager leadership can be transmitted to the employee's unethical behavior through the benevolent supervisor leadership and the moderating effect of LMX and ethical climate.
Design/methodology/approachThrough a questionnaire survey of 406 pairs of leaders, supervisor and employees, the authors use data aggregation test, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistics and multilevel model (HLM) to test our hypothesis.
Findings(1) Manager supervisor leadership is negatively related to unethical employee behavior, (2) benevolent supervisor leadership mediates the relationship between benevolent manager leadership and unethical employee behavior, (3) LMX positively moderates the relationship between benevolent manager leadership and benevolent supervisor leadership and moderates the mediating effect of benevolent supervisor leadership, and (4) ethical climate positively moderates the relationship between benevolent supervisor leadership and unethical employee behavior and moderates the mediating effect of benevolent supervisor leadership.
Originality/valueFirst, based on previous studies, this study further proves that benevolent leadership is a popular positive leadership among the three dimensions of paternalistic leadership that extends its influence to unethical employee behavior.
Second, the study traces the source of the benevolent leadership of employees' supervisors and reveals the action mechanism of how benevolent manager leadership affects unethical employee behavior (trickle-down effect).
LMX and the ethical climate provide the organizational context of the trickle-down effect and the occurrence of unethical employee behavior.

Related Results

Why People Stay: How Leadership Competence, Trust, and Organisational Culture May Influence Employee Retention
Why People Stay: How Leadership Competence, Trust, and Organisational Culture May Influence Employee Retention
Employee retention is defined as pay, workload, career opportunities and employment conditions. These factors matter, but do not explain why employees choose to stay in some organi...
The Weight of Benevolent Expectations: Benevolent Sexism and the Emotional Discomfort of Men's Unfulfilled Prescriptions
The Weight of Benevolent Expectations: Benevolent Sexism and the Emotional Discomfort of Men's Unfulfilled Prescriptions
Benevolent sexism is a harmful ideology that prescribes traditional gender roles to men (i.e., protector and provider) and women (i.e. warm and nurturing homemaker). Existing resea...
ScholarOne - Can leadership be dynamic? Sleep, daily benevolent leadership, and employee deviant behavior
ScholarOne - Can leadership be dynamic? Sleep, daily benevolent leadership, and employee deviant behavior
At present, there are few studies on the antecedents of benevolent leadership, and it is regard as a static characteristic. At the same time, research on the effects of sleep gener...
Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm in Internet of Things
Elastic Hop Count Trickle Timer Algorithm in Internet of Things
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a technology that allows machines to communicate with each other without the need for human interaction. Usually, IoT devices are connected via a ne...
Determinants of employee-prohibitive voice behavior : mediating role of psychological safety
Determinants of employee-prohibitive voice behavior : mediating role of psychological safety
The study of the determinants of employee-prohibitive voice behavior, a relatively new area of research, has recently gained significant attention. Psychological safety has emerged...

Back to Top