Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient Engagement Survey Regarding Future Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Tapering of Chronic Opioid Therapy

View through CrossRef
Objective: There is a lack of evidence regarding tapering opioid medications in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The purpose of this survey was to gather perspectives on future research into opioid tapering from utilizers of chronic opioid therapy (COT) or other people affected by chronic noncancer pain. Methods: The survey was distributed in paper form to patients on COT and via an online platform to patients self-enrolled in the chronic pain patient engagement group. The survey included a layman’s description of a possible tapering trial of opioid medications and elicited binary responses regarding willingness to participate and reasoning as well as qualitative freeform responses. Thematic analysis was performed to identify themes in narrative responses. Results: A total of 190 surveys were returned with 72.1% of all respondents answering positively regarding their willingness to participate in a proposed study. The most common reasons for participating in the study included concerns regarding opioid dependence, adding to society’s knowledge of opioid medications, and determining if the respondent would personally receive benefit from opioid medications. Patients recently on COT felt it was important to be able to withdraw from the study and return to usual care at any time (41.8% for recent COT and 15.5% for no recent COT, P < .05). The most common reason for unwillingness to participate was that respondents did not feel they had enough information to feel comfortable participating. The narrative responses showed a group of respondents felt COT was the only answer to their or their loved ones’ chronic pain and that a study would demonstrate the need to continue these medications long-term. There were also stories of side effects and dependence with decreasing effectiveness of opioids for pain control. When prompted to comment on study design, respondents indicated the study should include alternative pain management options. This was accompanied by responses with the assumption that pain will worsen as opioid medications are decreased. Conclusion: Patient concerns regarding opioid medications and discontinuation reflect the lack of evidence available to prescribers. There appears to be patient support for future research into the effects of tapering opioid medications.
Title: Patient Engagement Survey Regarding Future Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Tapering of Chronic Opioid Therapy
Description:
Objective: There is a lack of evidence regarding tapering opioid medications in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.
The purpose of this survey was to gather perspectives on future research into opioid tapering from utilizers of chronic opioid therapy (COT) or other people affected by chronic noncancer pain.
Methods: The survey was distributed in paper form to patients on COT and via an online platform to patients self-enrolled in the chronic pain patient engagement group.
The survey included a layman’s description of a possible tapering trial of opioid medications and elicited binary responses regarding willingness to participate and reasoning as well as qualitative freeform responses.
Thematic analysis was performed to identify themes in narrative responses.
Results: A total of 190 surveys were returned with 72.
1% of all respondents answering positively regarding their willingness to participate in a proposed study.
The most common reasons for participating in the study included concerns regarding opioid dependence, adding to society’s knowledge of opioid medications, and determining if the respondent would personally receive benefit from opioid medications.
Patients recently on COT felt it was important to be able to withdraw from the study and return to usual care at any time (41.
8% for recent COT and 15.
5% for no recent COT, P < .
05).
The most common reason for unwillingness to participate was that respondents did not feel they had enough information to feel comfortable participating.
The narrative responses showed a group of respondents felt COT was the only answer to their or their loved ones’ chronic pain and that a study would demonstrate the need to continue these medications long-term.
There were also stories of side effects and dependence with decreasing effectiveness of opioids for pain control.
When prompted to comment on study design, respondents indicated the study should include alternative pain management options.
This was accompanied by responses with the assumption that pain will worsen as opioid medications are decreased.
Conclusion: Patient concerns regarding opioid medications and discontinuation reflect the lack of evidence available to prescribers.
There appears to be patient support for future research into the effects of tapering opioid medications.

Related Results

Attitudes of chronic pain patients on long-term opioid therapy toward opioid tapering
Attitudes of chronic pain patients on long-term opioid therapy toward opioid tapering
AbstractThe chronic pain and opioid addiction epidemics interact with each other, potentially exacerbating each respective condition. Despite having modest efficacy, millions of ch...
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
To achieve high therapeutic efficacy in the patient, information on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics is required. With the development of science and techno...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Abstract Background: The management of pain in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex, with the intermingling of both acute vaso-occlusive events and chron...
Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Cesarean Delivery
Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Cesarean Delivery
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a multiphase, departmental quality improvement effort decreases opioid prescribing and increases multimodal analgesic use after cesarean de...
A multicomponent intervention to improve adherence to opioid prescribing and monitoring guidelines in primary care
A multicomponent intervention to improve adherence to opioid prescribing and monitoring guidelines in primary care
Objective: Guidelines for appropriate management of chronic opioid therapy are underutilized by primary care physicians (PCPs). The authors hypothesized that developing a multicomp...
Exploring the impact of the opioid epidemic in Black and Hispanic communities in the United States
Exploring the impact of the opioid epidemic in Black and Hispanic communities in the United States
Context: In recent years, due to an alarming increase in the number of opioid-related overdose fatalities for White, Non-Hispanics in rural and suburban communities across the Unit...
Abstract 4360: Opioid, non-opioid, and non-pharmacological pain management in patients with a history of cancer
Abstract 4360: Opioid, non-opioid, and non-pharmacological pain management in patients with a history of cancer
Abstract Background Pain is highly prevalent among individuals with cancer. Consequently, adequate and equitable pain management are hallmarks of quality cancer care...

Back to Top