Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Interest and knowledge about the genetics and biology of inherited risk of and progression of disease is growing. Physicians are increasingly using tests and technology, including germline genetic, genomic, and biomarker testing, to provide insight into a healthy individual's risk and an affected individual's disease characteristics, in order to provide personalized clinical management. However, many barriers to adoption of precision medicine still exist in the clinical setting, including rapid advances in technology and research, complex guidelines for eligibility, variable quality and cost, and adequate understanding of appropriate implementation by medical professionals. Methods The iGAP Registry uses an innovative digital platform to collect genetic, genomic, biomarker data and correlates it with clinical, pathologic and outcome data to inform providers of an individual’s risk of developing cancer, guide them to appropriate clinical grade testing and provide clinical decision support to providers for prevention and management strategies over time. The iGAP Registry’s digital platform minimizes technological barriers to longitudinal research participation and is available in mobile and desktop formats, allowing for easy implementation in a wide variety of clinic and hospital settings. The risk tool uses predictive analytics to identify and curate patients at risk who are eligible for initial and further testing. The tool additionally can generate letters of medical necessity, each individualized by personal and family history, for eligibility for genetic testing (based on national guidelines) and additional imaging (based on validated cancer risk calculators). The insights tool provides physicians with decision support on how to interpret and manage abnormal genetic testing results on an individual level and supports improved understanding across lab terminology through variant classification. The insights tool also supplies letters of medical necessity and supporting evidence across many specialties. The platform connects the information stored in the risk and insights tools to a unique participant record and automatically feeds the data into a digital case report form for the research registry. Additional clinical data is entered for patients who consent to be a part of the Registry. This allows for seamless longitudinal data collection over time without disrupting typical clinical workflows, and is further enriched by emailed patient-reported outcomes and physician decision impact questionnaires. Follow-up occurs over 5 years after initial data entry for the 10,000 expected subjects in the Registry (Table 1). Conclusion The iGAP Registry is a multi-center longitudinal, observational research database with an integrated platform of clinically-useful tools designed to address gaps for providers specifically for identifying individuals at elevated risk based on clinical and pathologic factors, guiding them to appropriate genetic, genomic, and biomarker testing and providing clinical insights on actionable results for personalized management and prevention for the individual and their family members over time. The iGAP Registry is currently enrolling and accepting new sites at www.igapregistry.org or https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04419896. Table 1: Eligibility CriteriaRetrospective18 years or older;Is/was a patient at participating practice previously tested with germline, genomic, or biomarker tests;For germline patients, have a diagnosis of cancer or P/LP result.Prospective18 years or older;§Presents consecutively to a participating practice and who has previously been screened and tested;Receives/has received germline, genomic, or other biomarker testing, either through a prior provider or a participating practice;Consents to be a part of the registry. Citation Format: Rakesh Patel, Peter Beitsch, Pat Whitworth, Chloe Wernecke, Mary Kay Hardwick. The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-11-01.
Title: Abstract OT-11-01: The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry
Description:
Abstract Background Interest and knowledge about the genetics and biology of inherited risk of and progression of disease is growing.
Physicians are increasingly using tests and technology, including germline genetic, genomic, and biomarker testing, to provide insight into a healthy individual's risk and an affected individual's disease characteristics, in order to provide personalized clinical management.
However, many barriers to adoption of precision medicine still exist in the clinical setting, including rapid advances in technology and research, complex guidelines for eligibility, variable quality and cost, and adequate understanding of appropriate implementation by medical professionals.
Methods The iGAP Registry uses an innovative digital platform to collect genetic, genomic, biomarker data and correlates it with clinical, pathologic and outcome data to inform providers of an individual’s risk of developing cancer, guide them to appropriate clinical grade testing and provide clinical decision support to providers for prevention and management strategies over time.
The iGAP Registry’s digital platform minimizes technological barriers to longitudinal research participation and is available in mobile and desktop formats, allowing for easy implementation in a wide variety of clinic and hospital settings.
The risk tool uses predictive analytics to identify and curate patients at risk who are eligible for initial and further testing.
The tool additionally can generate letters of medical necessity, each individualized by personal and family history, for eligibility for genetic testing (based on national guidelines) and additional imaging (based on validated cancer risk calculators).
The insights tool provides physicians with decision support on how to interpret and manage abnormal genetic testing results on an individual level and supports improved understanding across lab terminology through variant classification.
The insights tool also supplies letters of medical necessity and supporting evidence across many specialties.
The platform connects the information stored in the risk and insights tools to a unique participant record and automatically feeds the data into a digital case report form for the research registry.
Additional clinical data is entered for patients who consent to be a part of the Registry.
This allows for seamless longitudinal data collection over time without disrupting typical clinical workflows, and is further enriched by emailed patient-reported outcomes and physician decision impact questionnaires.
Follow-up occurs over 5 years after initial data entry for the 10,000 expected subjects in the Registry (Table 1).
Conclusion The iGAP Registry is a multi-center longitudinal, observational research database with an integrated platform of clinically-useful tools designed to address gaps for providers specifically for identifying individuals at elevated risk based on clinical and pathologic factors, guiding them to appropriate genetic, genomic, and biomarker testing and providing clinical insights on actionable results for personalized management and prevention for the individual and their family members over time.
The iGAP Registry is currently enrolling and accepting new sites at www.
igapregistry.
org or https://clinicaltrials.
gov/ct2/show/NCT04419896.
Table 1: Eligibility CriteriaRetrospective18 years or older;Is/was a patient at participating practice previously tested with germline, genomic, or biomarker tests;For germline patients, have a diagnosis of cancer or P/LP result.
Prospective18 years or older;§Presents consecutively to a participating practice and who has previously been screened and tested;Receives/has received germline, genomic, or other biomarker testing, either through a prior provider or a participating practice;Consents to be a part of the registry.
Citation Format: Rakesh Patel, Peter Beitsch, Pat Whitworth, Chloe Wernecke, Mary Kay Hardwick.
The informed genetics annotated patient registry: The iGAP registry [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-11-01.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey
Perceived Gaps in Genetics Training Among Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists: Lessons From a National Survey
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, self-rated confidence, and perceived relevance of genetics in the clinical practice of audiologists and speech-la...
Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: Conduct, Advantages and Challenges – A Systematic Review.
Registry-Based Randomized Controlled Trials: Conduct, Advantages and Challenges – A Systematic Review.
Abstract Background: Registry-based Randomized Controlled Trials (rRCTs) have been described as pragmatic studies utilising patient data embedded in large scale registries,...
Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges—a systematic review
Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges—a systematic review
Abstract Background Registry-based randomised controlled trials (rRCTs) have been described as pragmatic studies utilising patient data embedded in ...
Forced Sterilization
Forced Sterilization
Photo by Renè Müller on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Forced sterilization of women around the globe is a human rights violation and bioethical concern. In the past, countries enacted laws...
The state of cancer care in Russia. Analytical indicators: one-year mortality (population study at the federal district level)
The state of cancer care in Russia. Analytical indicators: one-year mortality (population study at the federal district level)
         In February 2019, Russia's first Population-based Cancer Registry (PCR) was created at the federal district level with a database of more than 1 million 350 thousand obser...

Back to Top