Novel Method to Assess Treatment Effcacy in Preclinical Peripheral Arterial Disease Studies

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a condition caused by atherosclerotic narrowing or occlusion of blood vessels in the lower extremities, affects ~200 million adults globally and lacks effective treatment options to improve limb function. Cilostazol is the only approved pharmacological treatment option for PAD patients, but its effect on walking performance is modest and the drug is not widely used clinically. Over the past several decades, numerous therapies (drug, gene, and cell-based) have shown promise in the preclinical setting but failed to achieve primary outcomes in clinical trials. While the failure of therapeutic translation is complex, most preclinical studies have employed perfusion recovery as a primary outcome variable whereas most clinical trials in PAD patients employ the six-minute walk test. Although perfusion is an important contributor to limb function and walking performance, assessing preclinical therapeutics solely via perfusion recovery may be a flawed approach. Objective: To address the need for a more comprehensive method to assess the effcacy of preclinical PAD therapeutics, we aimed to develop a protocol to assess hindlimb function that incorporates assessment of muscle power and perfusion across a six-minute testing period. Methods: To assess muscle contractile performance, the tibialis anterior or plantarflexor muscles were carefully exposed and the distal tendon mounted to the force-length controller (Aurora Scientific) and the muscles were stimulated via the sciatic nerve in anesthetized C57BL6 mice. After obtaining isometric forces, a six-minute functional test was performed using repeated isotonic (shortening) contractions against a submaximal load (30% or 45% of the reference force). Muscle fatigue was measured as a change in power across the testing period. Throughout the test, laser Doppler flowmetry was used to measure muscle blood flow. Hindlimb ischemia was used as an experimental model of PAD. Results: In healthy mice without PAD, the test produced the expected dose-dependent relationship between fatigue and workload with contractions performed at 30% of the reference force having less fatigue compared to 45% of the reference force ( P=0.0051), without a significant difference in muscle blood flow between the conditions. Compared the mice that received a sham surgery, those subjected to hindlimb ischemia displayed significantly lower maximal isometric forces (1514 ± 118 mN vs. 880 ± 85 mN, P=0.0001) and power at 35% maximal force (280 ± 12 vs. 105 ± 46 watts/kg, P=0.0002). Whereas sham mice lost ~25% power across the six-minute test, HLI mice displayed a ~70% loss of power. Regarding muscle blood flow, sham mice increased blood flow ~250% whereas HLI mice were only able to increase blood flow to ~105% ( P<0.001). Conclusions: This newly developed protocol successfully combines isotonic muscle function and limb perfusion assessments in the hindlimb of mice and can detect differences between healthy and PAD mice. Future work is needed to fully evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of this method to select therapeutics in preclinical PAD models. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01-HL149704 (T.E.R.). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.