Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Debris cover effect on the evolution of glaciation in the Northern Caucasus

View through CrossRef
<p>A common disadvantage of almost all global glacier models is that they ignore the explicit description of the debris cover on the heat exchange of the glacier surfaces with the atmosphere. Debris cover plays a key role in the regulation of melt processes. A debris cover more than a few centimeters reduces melting, since it isolates the underlying ice. In this way, debris covered areas are thought to be less exposed to rising temperatures, thereby reducing glacier retreat and mass loss.        </p><p>In the foothills of the North Caucasus, an important agricultural region, the problem of expected changes in mountain glaciation is particularly acute, since fluctuations in the flow regime of local rivers depend on the evolution of glaciers: the contribution of glacial runoff to total discharge is very significant.</p><p>Here, we present the assessment of debris cover influence on the glacier evolution of the Northern Caucasus on a regional scale (Terek and Kuban river basins). The aim is to determine how much the characteristics of mountain glaciation (its mass balance, area, volume, position of the glacier fronts) of the Northern Caucasus depend on the debris cover evolution. In order to accomplish this goal, we use the GloGEMflow model and a newly created debris cover dynamic module, which is calibrated using newly mapped debris cover outlines. The debris thickness evolution is simulated with a steady deposit model adapted from Verhaegen et al. (2020) and Anderson & Anderson (2016), where debris input onto the glacier is generated from a fixed point on the flow line.</p><p>The results reveal that the debris cover evolution pattern differ significantly for Terek and Kuban glacierized basins. Lower elevated Kuban basin glaciers undergo a rapid retreat and lose the debris covered glacier tongues while the Terek basin glaciers experience supraglacial debris expansion with a six times larger effect of debris cover on glacier volume evolution. From 2000 to 2016 the mass loss in the Terek ice basin reached 47834 Mt with an influence of the debris cover module and 50435 Mt  under debris-free conditions. Therefore, we can expect that by the end of the current century the mass loss of the Terek glaciers will be significantly overestimated in case debris cover influence will be ignored in model calculations. On the contrary, in the Kuban basin, calculated mass loss in 2000-2016 with and without debris cover were 1249 Mt  and 1258 Mt  respectfully. Committed loss experiments (constant mean climate for 1990-2015) show that the glaciers of the Terek basin lose ~35% of ice if debris cover is not taken into account and ~29% if debris cover module is turned on (~2  ice volume difference). For the Kuban basin glaciers, the difference of ice volume is only ~0.1  in debris-free vs. debris-covered modes.</p><p>The reported study was funded by the RFBR and RS grant 21-55-10003, the work of T. Postnikova was supported by the RFBR grant 20-35-90042.</p>
Title: Debris cover effect on the evolution of glaciation in the Northern Caucasus
Description:
<p>A common disadvantage of almost all global glacier models is that they ignore the explicit description of the debris cover on the heat exchange of the glacier surfaces with the atmosphere.
Debris cover plays a key role in the regulation of melt processes.
A debris cover more than a few centimeters reduces melting, since it isolates the underlying ice.
In this way, debris covered areas are thought to be less exposed to rising temperatures, thereby reducing glacier retreat and mass loss.
        </p><p>In the foothills of the North Caucasus, an important agricultural region, the problem of expected changes in mountain glaciation is particularly acute, since fluctuations in the flow regime of local rivers depend on the evolution of glaciers: the contribution of glacial runoff to total discharge is very significant.
</p><p>Here, we present the assessment of debris cover influence on the glacier evolution of the Northern Caucasus on a regional scale (Terek and Kuban river basins).
The aim is to determine how much the characteristics of mountain glaciation (its mass balance, area, volume, position of the glacier fronts) of the Northern Caucasus depend on the debris cover evolution.
In order to accomplish this goal, we use the GloGEMflow model and a newly created debris cover dynamic module, which is calibrated using newly mapped debris cover outlines.
The debris thickness evolution is simulated with a steady deposit model adapted from Verhaegen et al.
(2020) and Anderson & Anderson (2016), where debris input onto the glacier is generated from a fixed point on the flow line.
</p><p>The results reveal that the debris cover evolution pattern differ significantly for Terek and Kuban glacierized basins.
Lower elevated Kuban basin glaciers undergo a rapid retreat and lose the debris covered glacier tongues while the Terek basin glaciers experience supraglacial debris expansion with a six times larger effect of debris cover on glacier volume evolution.
From 2000 to 2016 the mass loss in the Terek ice basin reached 47834 Mt with an influence of the debris cover module and 50435 Mt  under debris-free conditions.
Therefore, we can expect that by the end of the current century the mass loss of the Terek glaciers will be significantly overestimated in case debris cover influence will be ignored in model calculations.
On the contrary, in the Kuban basin, calculated mass loss in 2000-2016 with and without debris cover were 1249 Mt  and 1258 Mt  respectfully.
Committed loss experiments (constant mean climate for 1990-2015) show that the glaciers of the Terek basin lose ~35% of ice if debris cover is not taken into account and ~29% if debris cover module is turned on (~2  ice volume difference).
For the Kuban basin glaciers, the difference of ice volume is only ~0.
1  in debris-free vs.
debris-covered modes.
</p><p>The reported study was funded by the RFBR and RS grant 21-55-10003, the work of T.
Postnikova was supported by the RFBR grant 20-35-90042.
</p>.

Related Results

Anthropogenic materials in the nests of Passerine birds: does the environment matter?
Anthropogenic materials in the nests of Passerine birds: does the environment matter?
Background. For several past decades, a notable pollution of the environment by different kinds of solid waste has been noted. The number of studies addressing the issue of utilisi...
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska, Part A:in situ mass balance measurements
Abstract. The mass balance of many Alaskan glaciers is perturbed by debris cover. Yet the effect of debris on glacier response to climate change in Alaska has largely been overlook...
Mapping debris thickness on alpine glaciers using UAV thermography and photogrammetry
Mapping debris thickness on alpine glaciers using UAV thermography and photogrammetry
<p>Supraglacial debris covers the tongue of many mountain glaciers. In the course of ongoing climate change and the rapid melting of glaciers, debris extent and thick...
Chemical Classification of Space Debris
Chemical Classification of Space Debris
Abstract  Space debris, here referring to all non‐operating orbital objects, has steadily increased in number so that it has become a potential barrier to the exploration of space....
PENGARUH KONSUMSI APEL (Pyrus malus) TERHADAP INDEKS DEBRIS PADA ANAK USIA 9 TAHUN DI SD KATOLIK ST. THERESIA MALALAYANG
PENGARUH KONSUMSI APEL (Pyrus malus) TERHADAP INDEKS DEBRIS PADA ANAK USIA 9 TAHUN DI SD KATOLIK ST. THERESIA MALALAYANG
Absract: Oral hygiene andpoor food consumption patterns can lead to dental caries. One of the contributing factors that cause dental caries is debris or remnants of food stuck in t...
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
Debris cover and the thinning of Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
<p>Many glaciers in High Mountain Asia are experiencing the debris-cover anomaly. The Kennicott Glacier, a large Alaskan Glacier, is also thinning most rapidly under ...
The Causes of Debris-Covered Glacier Thinning: Evidence for the Importance of Ice Dynamics From Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
The Causes of Debris-Covered Glacier Thinning: Evidence for the Importance of Ice Dynamics From Kennicott Glacier, Alaska
The cause of debris-covered glacier thinning remains controversial. One hypothesis asserts that melt hotspots (ice cliffs, ponds, or thin debris) increase thinning, while the other...
Seasonal Distribution, Composition, and Inventory of Plastic Debris on the Yugang Park Beach in Zhanjiang Bay, South China Sea
Seasonal Distribution, Composition, and Inventory of Plastic Debris on the Yugang Park Beach in Zhanjiang Bay, South China Sea
Plastic debris contamination in marine environments is a global problem that poses a considerable threat to the sustainability and health of coastal ecosystems. Marine beaches, as ...

Back to Top