Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Decommissioning Process Optimization Methodology

View through CrossRef
Abstract The over 4,500 idle wells and 783 idle structures in the U.S. federal waters of the Outer Continental Shelf at the beginning of 2011 were increasing the risk of contamination to the environment as these assets aged, while at the same time the cost to decommission these assets was on the rise. During the hurricane seasons of 2005 and 2008 over 175 structures and 1,000 wells were damaged or toppled to the sea floor by wind and storm surge that further exposed the risk, increased the cost of decommissioning and made underwriting the repair or replacement of these assets no longer affordable to many operators. Renewed pressure on operators to decommission idle infrastructure sooner rather than later was brought forth by the issuance of new guidelines by regulators in the form of a Notice to Lessee. These new guidelines now require operators to decommission idle wells and supporting structures as soon as possible, but no later than 5 years after they become no longer useful for producing oil and gas in paying quantities. With the cost of decommissioning and regulatory pressure increasing, many operators began seeking new and better decommissioning methods that could get more work done, safely and at a lower cost. Employing the newest technologies, a new, optimized decommissioning methodology was made possible. The size and capabilities of a newly designed and constructed 335 class self-elevating, self-propelled, marine vessel (liftboat) allowed a departure from the traditional method of performing decommissioning work-steps sequentially, one-after-the-other, to a new method of performing the majority of work-steps concurrently in just one spread mobilization. The new concurrent model was utilized over a 30-month period and demonstrated that not only did the new liftboat perform as proposed, use of the new model resulted in a 140% more wells and structures being removed over the number expected to have been removed using traditional methods. The actual spend to execute the total work scope was reduced by one-third (33%) and, most importantly, the excellent safety performance achieved by the single, consistent team of specialty workers was recognized with the presentation of the 2013 Safety-in-Seas Award by the National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA).
Title: Decommissioning Process Optimization Methodology
Description:
Abstract The over 4,500 idle wells and 783 idle structures in the U.
S.
federal waters of the Outer Continental Shelf at the beginning of 2011 were increasing the risk of contamination to the environment as these assets aged, while at the same time the cost to decommission these assets was on the rise.
During the hurricane seasons of 2005 and 2008 over 175 structures and 1,000 wells were damaged or toppled to the sea floor by wind and storm surge that further exposed the risk, increased the cost of decommissioning and made underwriting the repair or replacement of these assets no longer affordable to many operators.
Renewed pressure on operators to decommission idle infrastructure sooner rather than later was brought forth by the issuance of new guidelines by regulators in the form of a Notice to Lessee.
These new guidelines now require operators to decommission idle wells and supporting structures as soon as possible, but no later than 5 years after they become no longer useful for producing oil and gas in paying quantities.
With the cost of decommissioning and regulatory pressure increasing, many operators began seeking new and better decommissioning methods that could get more work done, safely and at a lower cost.
Employing the newest technologies, a new, optimized decommissioning methodology was made possible.
The size and capabilities of a newly designed and constructed 335 class self-elevating, self-propelled, marine vessel (liftboat) allowed a departure from the traditional method of performing decommissioning work-steps sequentially, one-after-the-other, to a new method of performing the majority of work-steps concurrently in just one spread mobilization.
The new concurrent model was utilized over a 30-month period and demonstrated that not only did the new liftboat perform as proposed, use of the new model resulted in a 140% more wells and structures being removed over the number expected to have been removed using traditional methods.
The actual spend to execute the total work scope was reduced by one-third (33%) and, most importantly, the excellent safety performance achieved by the single, consistent team of specialty workers was recognized with the presentation of the 2013 Safety-in-Seas Award by the National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA).

Related Results

Subsea Pipelines and Flowlines Decommissioning: What We Should Know for a Rational Approach
Subsea Pipelines and Flowlines Decommissioning: What We Should Know for a Rational Approach
Offshore and subsea decommissioning will increase in the next five years or so as many producing fields are matured and cease production while the oil price continues to remain low...
Current Situation and Development Trend of Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants
Current Situation and Development Trend of Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants
Abstract The complete life of a nuclear power plant consists of three stages: construction, operation and decommissioning. In the last stage of the operation life of...
Collaborations Involving Malaysia Upstream Regulator to Enhance Decommissioning
Collaborations Involving Malaysia Upstream Regulator to Enhance Decommissioning
Abstract This paper aims to share the collaboration efforts of Malaysia's governing body for Upstream oil & gas industry with various stakeholders to enhance dec...
Impossible to Possible - Decommissioning the UAE's Oldest Oil Refinery with Zero Flaring
Impossible to Possible - Decommissioning the UAE's Oldest Oil Refinery with Zero Flaring
Abstract Decommissioning of Oil Refinery is not a regular affair, hence information on best practices being followed during facility decommissioning is not available...
Decommissioning of Subsea Equipment – A Technical Approach Through the Multicriteria Analysis Methodology
Decommissioning of Subsea Equipment – A Technical Approach Through the Multicriteria Analysis Methodology
Abstract Decommissioning of offshore subsea systems refers to the safe disposal of oil and gas exploration and production structures and their respective subsea comp...
Transforming Decommissioning Planning
Transforming Decommissioning Planning
The decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure is a key aspect in the life cycle of the facility and incurs a significant amount of cost. Decom North Sea...
Italy’s Experience in the Decommissioning of Fuel Cycle Plants: The historian's Perspective
Italy’s Experience in the Decommissioning of Fuel Cycle Plants: The historian's Perspective
Italy represents a unique case of a country that invested heavily in the development of nuclear power before abandoning outright this energy source in 1987. Drawing on uncatalogued...
Environmentally Friendly Subsea Pipeline Decommissioning
Environmentally Friendly Subsea Pipeline Decommissioning
Abstract Objectives/Scope Subsea pipeline decommissioning for either abandonment or retrieval is hazardous for both divers and t...

Back to Top