Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Word recall differences between writing by hand and typing

View through CrossRef
This study determined how writing style affected people's recall and recognition of words. The three writing techniques used were handwriting using a pen on paper, typing on a conventional laptop keyboard, and typing on an iPad touch keyboard. A properly counterbalanced within-subjects experimental design was used, and 36 females between the ages of 19 and 54 participated. In this study, participants were given a wordlist and directed to use one of three distinct writing modalities to record words that were read aloud to them. For this study, the wordlist paradigm was applied. A person's memory for words typed using handwriting, a standard keyboard, and a virtual iPad keyboard was tested using oral free recall and recognition. For the analysis of the data, non-parametric statistics were used. Following analyses revealed that participants' free memory of words written in the handwriting condition was considerably higher than that of both keyboard writing conditions for the free recall measure. The findings demonstrate an all-encompassing influence of the writing medium. The findings also reveal that participants' free recall of terms written in handwriting was much better. There was no obvious effect of writing mode in the recognition condition. This shows that handwriting may have unique cognitive benefits that may not be completely retained while writing on a keyboard, especially concerning word memory components. One of these advantages might be word recall. The implications of the study's findings on cognition and education are investigated.
Title: Word recall differences between writing by hand and typing
Description:
This study determined how writing style affected people's recall and recognition of words.
The three writing techniques used were handwriting using a pen on paper, typing on a conventional laptop keyboard, and typing on an iPad touch keyboard.
A properly counterbalanced within-subjects experimental design was used, and 36 females between the ages of 19 and 54 participated.
In this study, participants were given a wordlist and directed to use one of three distinct writing modalities to record words that were read aloud to them.
For this study, the wordlist paradigm was applied.
A person's memory for words typed using handwriting, a standard keyboard, and a virtual iPad keyboard was tested using oral free recall and recognition.
For the analysis of the data, non-parametric statistics were used.
Following analyses revealed that participants' free memory of words written in the handwriting condition was considerably higher than that of both keyboard writing conditions for the free recall measure.
The findings demonstrate an all-encompassing influence of the writing medium.
The findings also reveal that participants' free recall of terms written in handwriting was much better.
There was no obvious effect of writing mode in the recognition condition.
This shows that handwriting may have unique cognitive benefits that may not be completely retained while writing on a keyboard, especially concerning word memory components.
One of these advantages might be word recall.
The implications of the study's findings on cognition and education are investigated.

Related Results

Testing and Evaluating Typing Ability in Research Writing
Testing and Evaluating Typing Ability in Research Writing
Before a person can generate writing that can be deemed respectable when using a keyboard, it is usually acknowledged that they must first have exceptional typing talents. This is ...
Unlock Large Potentials of Standard Mud Gas for Real-Time Fluid Typing
Unlock Large Potentials of Standard Mud Gas for Real-Time Fluid Typing
Standard mud gas data is part of the basic mudlogging service and is mainly used for safety. Although the data is available for all wells, it is not used for real-time fluid typing...
Unlock Large Potentials of Standard Mud Gas for Real-Time Fluid Typing
Unlock Large Potentials of Standard Mud Gas for Real-Time Fluid Typing
Standard mud gas data are part of the basic mud-logging service and are mainly used for safety. Although the data are available for all wells, it is not used for real-time fluid ty...

Back to Top