Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Immunosuppressant nonadherence profile in kidney transplant recipients and the impact of medication adherence on transplant outcomes
View through CrossRef
BackgroundDespite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge. Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure. Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes.MethodsThis study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence. The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes.ResultsThe prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.6%. The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.240, 95% CI: 1.136–1.353, p < 0.001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.145, 95% CI: 2.690–9.840, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence. There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.7 ± 8.7 vs. 25.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.010). Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.932, p = 0.001). The rates of graft loss (7.1% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.006) and rejection (12.4% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group.ConclusionLonger time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication. Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes.
Title: Immunosuppressant nonadherence profile in kidney transplant recipients and the impact of medication adherence on transplant outcomes
Description:
BackgroundDespite the fact that 1-year graft and recipient survival rates are above 90% in most transplant centers, improving long-term graft survival remains an important challenge.
Immunosuppressant nonadherence has been recognized as one of the important risk factors for long-term graft failure.
Understanding the modifiable correlates and risk factors for medication non-adherence is essential to develop interventions to improve adherence and thus long-term transplantation outcomes.
MethodsThis study conducted a questionnaire survey on 431 renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic between January 2022 and January 2023, and 409 valid questionnaires were returned.
The BAASIS questionnaire was used to assess the prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy (implementation phase) in Chinese renal transplant recipients and to explore the multilevel correlates of immunosuppressive nonadherence.
The BAASIS questionnaire was used to categorize renal transplant recipients into adherent (n = 239) and non-adherent (n = 170) groups, and a prospective cohort study with a 1-year follow-up was conducted to explore the impact of immunosuppressant non-adherence on clinical outcomes.
ResultsThe prevalence of nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients in this study was as high as 41.
6%.
The number of years post-transplant (OR: 1.
240, 95% CI: 1.
136–1.
353, p < 0.
001) and the frequency of twice-daily dosing (OR: 5.
145, 95% CI: 2.
690–9.
840, p < 0.
001) were positively correlated with immunosuppressive nonadherence.
There was a significant difference in TAC IPV (Intra-individual Variability) between the adherent and nonadherent groups (22.
7 ± 8.
7 vs.
25.
4 ± 11.
6, p = 0.
010).
Renal function remained stable during the follow-up period in the recipients in the adherence group and tended to decrease in the recipients in the non-adherence group (F = 4.
932, p = 0.
001).
The rates of graft loss (7.
1% vs.
1.
7%, p = 0.
006) and rejection (12.
4% vs.
4.
2%, p = 0.
002) were higher in the nonadherent group than in the adherent group.
ConclusionLonger time post-transplant and higher frequency of immunosuppressive dosing were positively associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressives medication.
Immunosuppressant nonadherence was associated with adverse graft outcomes.
Related Results
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Abstract 2233: Biobehavioral Factors and Heart Failure Medication Adherence
Background:
Medication adherence in heart failure (HF) patients reduces hospitalizations and improves outcomes, yet it is variable. This study evaluated adherence rates...
An internet-based expressive writing intervention for kidney transplant recipients
An internet-based expressive writing intervention for kidney transplant recipients
Background: Previous research has found that psychiatric problems and stress in kidney transplant recipients negatively impact upon their quality of life (QOL) and how they heal fr...
Cognitive impairment, perceived medication adherence, and high‐risk medication use in patients with reduced kidney function: A cross‐sectional analysis
Cognitive impairment, perceived medication adherence, and high‐risk medication use in patients with reduced kidney function: A cross‐sectional analysis
AbstractBackground and AimsReduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) is a risk factor for cognitive impairment (CI) and medication nonadherence. Ho...
Factors influencing medication adherence among hypertensive patients in primary care settings in Central Vietnam: A cross-sectional study
Factors influencing medication adherence among hypertensive patients in primary care settings in Central Vietnam: A cross-sectional study
Background
Medication adherence plays a crucial role in effectively managing hypertension, a significant public health concern, especially in regions like Central Vietnam. This stu...
The adherence gap: Rural dwelling, low level of education, and missed opportunities for optimal hepatitis B control
The adherence gap: Rural dwelling, low level of education, and missed opportunities for optimal hepatitis B control
Background and Objectives: Long-term antiviral use can suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, normalize liver function tests, reverse fibrosis and cirrhosis, and improve histologica...
EVALUATING MEDICATION ADHERENCE BY MORISKY SCALE AND ADVISORY EFFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN HUE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
EVALUATING MEDICATION ADHERENCE BY MORISKY SCALE AND ADVISORY EFFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN HUE UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY HOSPITAL
Introduction: Good glycemic control is the most important factor in treatment of diabetes. Medication adherence in diabetes is crucial to achieve optimal glycemic control. Objectiv...
Effectiveness of using manual pill organizers and pill reminder apps in improving medication adherence and health outcomes in the Indian elderly population receiving multiple medications (PORA-MEDAdhere): Protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomized controlled
Effectiveness of using manual pill organizers and pill reminder apps in improving medication adherence and health outcomes in the Indian elderly population receiving multiple medications (PORA-MEDAdhere): Protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomized controlled
Abstract
Introduction
Poor medication adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes, an increase in hospitalisations, and increased...
Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant—Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?
Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplant—Does Hospital Experience With Heart Transplant or Kidney Transplant Have a Greater Impact on Patient Outcomes?
High institutional transplant volume is associated with improved outcomes in isolated heart and kidney transplant. The aim of this study was to assess trends and outcomes of simult...


