Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Feminist Theory

View through CrossRef
Feminist theory in communication is developed and used by scholars to understand gender as a communicative process, with the goal of making social changes important to the well-being of women and, ultimately, everyone. Despite a common purpose, feminist scholars differ on many grounds and typically work in subareas across the discipline of communication. Contemporary feminist theory blossomed among scholars interested in women and communication in the United States in the 1980s, with attention devoted to it in programming in academic communication associations and with a new wave of publishing that theorized, rather than assumed, gender differences. Its arrival grew from at least three inspirations over prior decades. First, developments in feminist theory in many disciplines were brought into the field by feminist scholars working across traditional disciplinary boundaries. When these developments made their way into the field of communication, they shook assumptions about women and men by rejecting the idea of an essentially gendered individual in favor of a view of gender and sexuality as culturally constructed and reproduced. Second, feminist communication activists, scholars, and professionals had laid important groundwork preceding the infusion of feminist theory into the field. They raised issues about media content and industry employers, questioned the androcentric nature of the history and research canonized in the field, proposed changes to media systems, and focused attention on women’s experiences with communication. Feminist theory, then, arrived in communication amid a strong record of research on women as speakers, organizers, and professionals and on sexist mass media images. Third, feminist theorizing, as it was undertaken in communication as well as in other disciplines, too often failed to consider its own theoretical assumptions about race and ethnicity, sexuality, class, and nationality, which, as a result, produced countervailing critiques of both white and Western feminist scholarship. These critiques pushed feminist theorists to reexamine assumptions about the universality of women’s experiences and the difficulties of solidarity in light of white privilege and Western colonialism. Because contemporary feminist theory in communication continues to reformulate taken-for-granted approaches about differences within and across gender systems and geographies, the choice of selections reflects the decision to reject canonizing texts and authors in favor of casting a wide net to cover the range of issues broached by, or that are important to, feminist scholars. Further, the selections that have been made address, or contribute substantially to, theory rather than primarily describe or summarize, and they include those that are focused on communication by communication scholars.
Oxford University Press
Title: Feminist Theory
Description:
Feminist theory in communication is developed and used by scholars to understand gender as a communicative process, with the goal of making social changes important to the well-being of women and, ultimately, everyone.
Despite a common purpose, feminist scholars differ on many grounds and typically work in subareas across the discipline of communication.
Contemporary feminist theory blossomed among scholars interested in women and communication in the United States in the 1980s, with attention devoted to it in programming in academic communication associations and with a new wave of publishing that theorized, rather than assumed, gender differences.
Its arrival grew from at least three inspirations over prior decades.
First, developments in feminist theory in many disciplines were brought into the field by feminist scholars working across traditional disciplinary boundaries.
When these developments made their way into the field of communication, they shook assumptions about women and men by rejecting the idea of an essentially gendered individual in favor of a view of gender and sexuality as culturally constructed and reproduced.
Second, feminist communication activists, scholars, and professionals had laid important groundwork preceding the infusion of feminist theory into the field.
They raised issues about media content and industry employers, questioned the androcentric nature of the history and research canonized in the field, proposed changes to media systems, and focused attention on women’s experiences with communication.
Feminist theory, then, arrived in communication amid a strong record of research on women as speakers, organizers, and professionals and on sexist mass media images.
Third, feminist theorizing, as it was undertaken in communication as well as in other disciplines, too often failed to consider its own theoretical assumptions about race and ethnicity, sexuality, class, and nationality, which, as a result, produced countervailing critiques of both white and Western feminist scholarship.
These critiques pushed feminist theorists to reexamine assumptions about the universality of women’s experiences and the difficulties of solidarity in light of white privilege and Western colonialism.
Because contemporary feminist theory in communication continues to reformulate taken-for-granted approaches about differences within and across gender systems and geographies, the choice of selections reflects the decision to reject canonizing texts and authors in favor of casting a wide net to cover the range of issues broached by, or that are important to, feminist scholars.
Further, the selections that have been made address, or contribute substantially to, theory rather than primarily describe or summarize, and they include those that are focused on communication by communication scholars.

Related Results

Feminist Historical Geography
Feminist Historical Geography
Feminist approaches reconstruct experience, privilege the everyday and embodied as a unit of analysis, and therefore foreground the significance of scale in geographical analyses. ...
Feminismos y género en los Estudios Internacionales
Feminismos y género en los Estudios Internacionales
In the last decades, the specific role of women in international relations has received more attention and feminist theories have gained ground in the intellectual debate, which ha...
Feminist Security Studies
Feminist Security Studies
In studying what happens in international relations, Cynthia Enloe asked: “Where are the women?” This question essentially underlies feminist international relations (IR). Beginnin...
Feminist Food Studies
Feminist Food Studies
Feminist food studies is an interdisciplinary area of scholarship that is concerned with identifying, describing, and challenging the ways that gender and gender-based oppression m...
Feminist Theories of International Relations
Feminist Theories of International Relations
The publication of the special issue of the journal Millennium on Women and International Relations (Vol. 17, no. 3, 1988) and the appearance of the pathbreaking book Bananas, Beac...
DEFYING PATRIARCHY: A RADICAL FEMINIST VIEW OF RESILIENCE IN GARCIA’S WE ARE NOT BORN SUBMISSIVE
DEFYING PATRIARCHY: A RADICAL FEMINIST VIEW OF RESILIENCE IN GARCIA’S WE ARE NOT BORN SUBMISSIVE
Present research study appraises Garcia’s ‘We Are Not Born Submissive’, in the light of the feminist text and the criticism it attracts. This study examines how radical feminism th...
Transnational Feminism
Transnational Feminism
Transnational feminism developed out of postcolonial and women of color feminisms, both of which critiqued the idea that “sisterhood is global” (see Robin Morgan, Sisterhood is Glo...
Feminist Anthropology
Feminist Anthropology
Feminist anthropology is simultaneously a critique of male as well as Euro-centered and biased anthropology; a historical moment that marks the development of theoretical frames th...

Back to Top