Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of flood hydrograph prediction between synthetic unit hydrograph methods and rain-on-grid model for Katulampa watershed, Indonesia

View through CrossRef
In this paper, 6 synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods, namely Snyder, SCS, GAMA-1, ITB-1, ITB-2, and Nakayasu, were compared against a rain-on-grid model (HEC-RAS) for flood hydrograph prediction in the Katulampa watershed, Indonesia. HEC-RAS was used with an open-access, ~30 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM), i.e. the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS). The relative error of the hydrograph results (peak discharge and time-to-peak) were compared with the observed data, while the errors in the hydrograph’s shape were detected using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC). We found that HEC-RAS could predict the flood hydrograph significantly more accurately than the SUH methods, yielding the RMSE value of 1.98 m3/s and the PPMC value of 0.93. This study remains an interesting example of how modern computational tool can improve the runoff prediction of conventional SUH methods.
Title: Comparison of flood hydrograph prediction between synthetic unit hydrograph methods and rain-on-grid model for Katulampa watershed, Indonesia
Description:
In this paper, 6 synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) methods, namely Snyder, SCS, GAMA-1, ITB-1, ITB-2, and Nakayasu, were compared against a rain-on-grid model (HEC-RAS) for flood hydrograph prediction in the Katulampa watershed, Indonesia.
HEC-RAS was used with an open-access, ~30 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM), i.
e.
the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS).
The relative error of the hydrograph results (peak discharge and time-to-peak) were compared with the observed data, while the errors in the hydrograph’s shape were detected using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC).
We found that HEC-RAS could predict the flood hydrograph significantly more accurately than the SUH methods, yielding the RMSE value of 1.
98 m3/s and the PPMC value of 0.
93.
This study remains an interesting example of how modern computational tool can improve the runoff prediction of conventional SUH methods.

Related Results

KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
KONTESTASI TASAWUF SUNNÎ DAN TASAWUF FALSAFÎ DI NUSANTARA
<p>This article scrutinizes the history of Islamic development in Nusantara between 15th to 18th centuries, which has been colored from theological mysticism thought. Uniquel...
CONJUNTURA
CONJUNTURA
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Revision>0</o:Revision> <o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime> <o:Pages>1</o:Pages> &...
Flood Hydrograph Coincidence Analysis of the Upper Yangtze River and Dongting Lake, China
Flood Hydrograph Coincidence Analysis of the Upper Yangtze River and Dongting Lake, China
Abstract In hydrological research, flood events can be analyzed by flood hydrograph coincidence. Existing flood hydrograph coincidence research mostly focuses on the analys...
Probabilistic Flood Hazard Maps at Ungauged Locations Using Multivariate Extreme Values Approach
Probabilistic Flood Hazard Maps at Ungauged Locations Using Multivariate Extreme Values Approach
&lt;p&gt;Flood hazard maps are essential for development and assessment of flood risk management strategies. Conventionally, flood hazard assessment is based on determinist...
Comparative Study of the Structural Resistance of Sawah rice and Gogo rice
Comparative Study of the Structural Resistance of Sawah rice and Gogo rice
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> &l...

Back to Top