Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

EVALUATION OF AGE-RELATED VISUAL FIELD CHANGES WITH DIFFERENT REFRACTIVE ERRORS

View through CrossRef
Background: Visual field sensitivity variations associated with refractive errors in young adults remain inadequately characterized, particularly in relation to aging and regional differences. While previous studies have focused on elderly populations, limited data exist on how myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism affect visual field sensitivity in individuals aged 18 to 30 years. Understanding these variations is crucial for refining clinical assessment strategies and optimizing refractive error management to ensure optimal visual function. Objective: To evaluate visual field sensitivity patterns in young adults with different refractive errors and assess the relationship between age, refractive status, and regional variations in visual field sensitivity. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 58 participants, including 26 myopic, 2 hyperopic, and 30 astigmatic individuals aged 18–30 years. Participants underwent refractive assessment using an auto-refractometer, followed by subjective refraction with a trial frame. Visual acuity was measured using the Snellen chart, and visual field sensitivity was analyzed using Humphrey perimetry. Sensitivity deviations were recorded for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants in both eyes, with and without refractive correction. Results: In myopic individuals, the superior field remained stable (-0.25 to -3.75 D), while the inferior field showed age-related declines (-0.3 dB at -1.75 D, -0.5 dB at -3.25 D, -0.75 dB at -2.0 D). Nasal deviations ranged from -0.05 dB to -1.25 dB, with temporal sensitivity declining by -0.5 dB at -4.0 D in non-corrected individuals. Hyperopic participants exhibited increased sensitivity in the superior (+1.5 to +2.6 dB), inferior (+2.0 dB), nasal (+1.0 to +1.5 dB), and temporal (+2.0 to +3.0 dB) fields. Astigmatism showed no superior field changes but demonstrated nasal deviations (-0.7 to -1.0 dB) and temporal reductions (-0.09 to -0.7 dB) in the right eye. The left eye exhibited inferior (-0.4 to -1.0 dB), nasal (-0.2 to -1.0 dB), and temporal (-0.3 to -1.0 dB) deviations. Conclusion: Visual field sensitivity in young adults varies significantly based on refractive error type and correction status. Myopia exhibited age-related declines, hyperopia showed enhanced sensitivity, and astigmatism demonstrated regional variations. These findings highlight the need for individualized approaches in clinical refractive management.
Title: EVALUATION OF AGE-RELATED VISUAL FIELD CHANGES WITH DIFFERENT REFRACTIVE ERRORS
Description:
Background: Visual field sensitivity variations associated with refractive errors in young adults remain inadequately characterized, particularly in relation to aging and regional differences.
While previous studies have focused on elderly populations, limited data exist on how myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism affect visual field sensitivity in individuals aged 18 to 30 years.
Understanding these variations is crucial for refining clinical assessment strategies and optimizing refractive error management to ensure optimal visual function.
Objective: To evaluate visual field sensitivity patterns in young adults with different refractive errors and assess the relationship between age, refractive status, and regional variations in visual field sensitivity.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 58 participants, including 26 myopic, 2 hyperopic, and 30 astigmatic individuals aged 18–30 years.
Participants underwent refractive assessment using an auto-refractometer, followed by subjective refraction with a trial frame.
Visual acuity was measured using the Snellen chart, and visual field sensitivity was analyzed using Humphrey perimetry.
Sensitivity deviations were recorded for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal quadrants in both eyes, with and without refractive correction.
Results: In myopic individuals, the superior field remained stable (-0.
25 to -3.
75 D), while the inferior field showed age-related declines (-0.
3 dB at -1.
75 D, -0.
5 dB at -3.
25 D, -0.
75 dB at -2.
0 D).
Nasal deviations ranged from -0.
05 dB to -1.
25 dB, with temporal sensitivity declining by -0.
5 dB at -4.
0 D in non-corrected individuals.
Hyperopic participants exhibited increased sensitivity in the superior (+1.
5 to +2.
6 dB), inferior (+2.
0 dB), nasal (+1.
0 to +1.
5 dB), and temporal (+2.
0 to +3.
0 dB) fields.
Astigmatism showed no superior field changes but demonstrated nasal deviations (-0.
7 to -1.
0 dB) and temporal reductions (-0.
09 to -0.
7 dB) in the right eye.
The left eye exhibited inferior (-0.
4 to -1.
0 dB), nasal (-0.
2 to -1.
0 dB), and temporal (-0.
3 to -1.
0 dB) deviations.
Conclusion: Visual field sensitivity in young adults varies significantly based on refractive error type and correction status.
Myopia exhibited age-related declines, hyperopia showed enhanced sensitivity, and astigmatism demonstrated regional variations.
These findings highlight the need for individualized approaches in clinical refractive management.

Related Results

NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
NICU Medication Errors: Describing the Cause and Nature of Medication Errors in a NICU in Qatar
IntroductionA medication error can be defined as “any error occurring in the medication use process” and focuses on problems with the delivery of medication to a patient [1]. Medic...
IMPACT OF REFRACTIVE CORRECTION ON VISUAL FATIGUE, EYE MOVEMENT AND READING SPEED IN ADULTS
IMPACT OF REFRACTIVE CORRECTION ON VISUAL FATIGUE, EYE MOVEMENT AND READING SPEED IN ADULTS
Background Refractive errors are a leading cause of visual impairment, significantly affecting daily activities that require sustained attention, such as reading. Uncorrected refra...
Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages
Association of Different Type of Refractive Errors with Parental Cousin Marriages
Refractive errors are the major reason of visual impairment and its prevalence has increased over time. Refractive errors affect ocular structures as corneal shape, eye’s axial len...
Prevalence of First Birth Order with Myopia Among KPK Population
Prevalence of First Birth Order with Myopia Among KPK Population
Objective: To find out the prevalence of myopia and hyperopia among the population of KPK. Study Designed: Cross-sectional analytical study. Place and duration of Study: OPD of ter...
ASSOCIATION OF HEADACHE AND REFRACTIVE ERROR IN SCREEN USERS
ASSOCIATION OF HEADACHE AND REFRACTIVE ERROR IN SCREEN USERS
Background: Headache has emerged as a common health complaint in the modern digital era, with its prevalence rising alongside the increasing dependence on digital screens. Young ad...
Comparison of Visual Outcomes of Extended Depth of Focus Lenses in Patients With and Without Previous Laser Refractive Surgery
Comparison of Visual Outcomes of Extended Depth of Focus Lenses in Patients With and Without Previous Laser Refractive Surgery
PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes of eyes with and without previous laser refractive surgery that received an extended depth of focus intraocular lens during cataract...
Pattern of refractive errors among the Nepalese population: a retrospective study
Pattern of refractive errors among the Nepalese population: a retrospective study
Introduction: Refractive errors are a major cause of visual impairment in the population. Purpose: To find the pattern of refractive errors among patients evaluated in a tertiary c...
Refractive Errors and their Effect on Academic Performance: A Public Health Perspective in University Students
Refractive Errors and their Effect on Academic Performance: A Public Health Perspective in University Students
Abstract Background Refractive errors such as myopia, hypermetropia, and astigmatism are common vision issues that can lead to blurred vision and affect quality of life and...

Back to Top