Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Estimating the Prevalence of Generative AI Use in Medical School Application Essays
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) tools became widely available to the public in November 2022. The extent to which these tools are being used by aspiring medical school applicants during the admissions process is unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 6,000 essays submitted to a U.S. medical school in 2021– 2022 (baseline, before wide availability of AI) and in 2023–2024 (test year) to estimate the prevalence of AI use and its relation to other application data. We used GPTZero, a commercially available detection tool, to generate a metric for the likelihood that each essay was human-generated, Phuman, ranging from 0 (entirely AI) to 1 (entirely human).ResultsFully human-generated negative controls demonstrated a median Phumanof 0.93, while AI-generated positive controls demonstrated a median Phumanof 0.01. Personal Comments essays submitted in the ‘23–‘24 cycle had a median human-generated score of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.78), versus 0.83 (95% CI 0.82–0.85) during the ‘21–‘22 cycle. Approximately 12.3 and 2.7% of essays were evaluated as having Phuman< 0.5 in the test and baseline year, respectively. Secondary essays demonstrated lower Phumanthan Personal Comments essays, suggesting more AI use. In multivariate analysis, younger age, visa requirement, and higher GPA were significantly associated with lower Phuman. No differences were observed in gender, MCAT score, undergraduate major, or socioeconomic status. Phumanwas not predictive of admissions outcomes in uni- or multivariate analyses.ConclusionsAn AI detection algorithm estimated significantly increased use of generative AI in 2023-2024 medical school admission applications, as compared to the 2021-2022 baseline. Estimated AI use demonstrated no significant differences in admissions decisions. While these results provide information about the applicant pool as a whole, AI detection is imperfect. We recommended exercising caution before deploying any AI detection tools on individual applications in live admissions cycles.DescriptionMedical school applicants increased their use of generative AI to write application essays in the most recent admissions cycle, but this use did not confer an admissions advantage.
Title: Estimating the Prevalence of Generative AI Use in Medical School Application Essays
Description:
AbstractBackgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) tools became widely available to the public in November 2022.
The extent to which these tools are being used by aspiring medical school applicants during the admissions process is unknown.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 6,000 essays submitted to a U.
S.
medical school in 2021– 2022 (baseline, before wide availability of AI) and in 2023–2024 (test year) to estimate the prevalence of AI use and its relation to other application data.
We used GPTZero, a commercially available detection tool, to generate a metric for the likelihood that each essay was human-generated, Phuman, ranging from 0 (entirely AI) to 1 (entirely human).
ResultsFully human-generated negative controls demonstrated a median Phumanof 0.
93, while AI-generated positive controls demonstrated a median Phumanof 0.
01.
Personal Comments essays submitted in the ‘23–‘24 cycle had a median human-generated score of 0.
77 (95% confidence interval 0.
76–0.
78), versus 0.
83 (95% CI 0.
82–0.
85) during the ‘21–‘22 cycle.
Approximately 12.
3 and 2.
7% of essays were evaluated as having Phuman< 0.
5 in the test and baseline year, respectively.
Secondary essays demonstrated lower Phumanthan Personal Comments essays, suggesting more AI use.
In multivariate analysis, younger age, visa requirement, and higher GPA were significantly associated with lower Phuman.
No differences were observed in gender, MCAT score, undergraduate major, or socioeconomic status.
Phumanwas not predictive of admissions outcomes in uni- or multivariate analyses.
ConclusionsAn AI detection algorithm estimated significantly increased use of generative AI in 2023-2024 medical school admission applications, as compared to the 2021-2022 baseline.
Estimated AI use demonstrated no significant differences in admissions decisions.
While these results provide information about the applicant pool as a whole, AI detection is imperfect.
We recommended exercising caution before deploying any AI detection tools on individual applications in live admissions cycles.
DescriptionMedical school applicants increased their use of generative AI to write application essays in the most recent admissions cycle, but this use did not confer an admissions advantage.
Related Results
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
The publication presents the findings of an inquiry conducted among 110 girls aged 15 - 17 who had been directed, on the grounds of being “out of school and out of work”, to two on...
Estimating the quality of preschool education: methodological orientation
Estimating the quality of preschool education: methodological orientation
The article positioned the current topical problem of estimating the quality of preschool education in terms of its methodological orientation. The concept of "preschool age" in a ...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Shaping Customer Loyalty in Banking: A Conceptual Framework
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Shaping Customer Loyalty in Banking: A Conceptual Framework
The role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) in Electronic Customer Relationship Management (Electronic-CRM) systems is reshaping consumer engagement in the banki...
Prevalence of Biomedical Health Risk Factors among Staff of Kashim Ibrahim College of Education Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria
Prevalence of Biomedical Health Risk Factors among Staff of Kashim Ibrahim College of Education Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria
This study assessed prevalence of biomedical health risk factors among staff members of Kashim Ibrahim College of Education, Maiduguri, in Borno State, Nigeria. A survey research d...
Identifying the school administrator’s understanding of the school nurse role
Identifying the school administrator’s understanding of the school nurse role
Background: School administrators are responsible for the oversight of school nurse roles, responsibilities, and staffing levels. However, administrators may not be fully aware of ...

