Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Gendered positions within the Portuguese populist radical right party Chega and among its women members: Are women always right?
View through CrossRef
Over the last three decades, populist radical right-wing parties have gained prominence in Europe, entering the political mainstream. Among the common features of such parties are included the support for traditional gender roles, opposition to so-called ‘gender ideology’ and feminist movements, and the protection of women’s rights through nationalist immigration policies. While research on gender in relation to these parties has surged alongside their electoral success, a scarcity is observed on gender-focused research on the Portuguese populist radical right, particularly the party
Chega
, which by 2024 had established itself as the third largest political party in the Portuguese parliament. This article centres
Chega
as a case study, setting out to explore the alignment between the official gender-related perspectives presented by the party and those defended by its women members. The focus of this study is on positions pertaining to gender equality, reproductive rights, gender ideology and femonationalism. The article offers an analysis of official
Chega
documents, an analysis of a party event on feminism, and analysis of interviews with
Chega
women members. Although small discrepancies can be found, particularly on the subject of reproductive rights, there is overall alignment between the party’s perspectives and those of the women
Chega
members who were interviewed, with the women generally expressing more straight-forward and radical stances regarding gender-related issues. This study contributes to the growing research on how populist radical right-wing parties in Europe engage with gender, as well as radical right-wing women’s perceptions of gender.
Title: Gendered positions within the Portuguese populist radical right party Chega and among its women members: Are women always right?
Description:
Over the last three decades, populist radical right-wing parties have gained prominence in Europe, entering the political mainstream.
Among the common features of such parties are included the support for traditional gender roles, opposition to so-called ‘gender ideology’ and feminist movements, and the protection of women’s rights through nationalist immigration policies.
While research on gender in relation to these parties has surged alongside their electoral success, a scarcity is observed on gender-focused research on the Portuguese populist radical right, particularly the party
Chega
, which by 2024 had established itself as the third largest political party in the Portuguese parliament.
This article centres
Chega
as a case study, setting out to explore the alignment between the official gender-related perspectives presented by the party and those defended by its women members.
The focus of this study is on positions pertaining to gender equality, reproductive rights, gender ideology and femonationalism.
The article offers an analysis of official
Chega
documents, an analysis of a party event on feminism, and analysis of interviews with
Chega
women members.
Although small discrepancies can be found, particularly on the subject of reproductive rights, there is overall alignment between the party’s perspectives and those of the women
Chega
members who were interviewed, with the women generally expressing more straight-forward and radical stances regarding gender-related issues.
This study contributes to the growing research on how populist radical right-wing parties in Europe engage with gender, as well as radical right-wing women’s perceptions of gender.
Related Results
Chega, racism and nativism in Portugal: An interview with Isabel David and Samuel de Paiva Pires
Chega, racism and nativism in Portugal: An interview with Isabel David and Samuel de Paiva Pires
Chega, a populist radical-right political party founded in 2019, has swiftly gained prominence in Portugal, challenging the notion of Portuguese exceptionalism in resisting populis...
The Populist Movement in the 19th Century
The Populist Movement in the 19th Century
American Populism of the 1880s and 1890s marked the political high-water mark of the social movements of farmers, wage earners, women, and other sectors of society in the years aft...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Performing the COVID-19 Crisis in Flemish Populist Radical-Right Discourse
Performing the COVID-19 Crisis in Flemish Populist Radical-Right Discourse
Performing the COVID-19 Crisis in Flemish Populist Radical-Right Discourse: A Case Study of Vlaams Belang’s Coronablunderboek
In June 2020, the Flemish populist radical r...
Populist radical-right junior coalition partners and liberal democracy in Europe
Populist radical-right junior coalition partners and liberal democracy in Europe
While many argue populist radical-right parties to be the largest contemporary threat to democracy, much of the evidence either focuses on the rare case of a populist radical-right...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
<p><b>The party wall is a commonly used building element that is rarely exploited to its full potential due to structural and legal complications. The party wall was in...
Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism
Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism
Populist attitudes have been shown to predict voting behaviour. These attitudes consist of a belief that everyday citizens are better judges of what is best for their own country t...

