Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Culture of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Nursing Research Training

View through CrossRef
Background Establishing and maintaining collaborative scientific environments that can cultivate and benefit from a full range of talents is essential for the quality and influence of science. Inclusion of research training and career development interventions to expose nursing PhD students, postdocs, and junior faculty to team science stands to prepare graduates to effectively engage with interdisciplinary colleagues to conduct cutting-edge nursing research and compete successfully for precious research resources. To be effective, nursing research workforce development programs need to recognize and share a culture of interdisciplinarity. Objectives This project aims to develop, validate, and disseminate a theoretically grounded and methodologically rigorous tool for a cultural consensus analysis (CCA) of the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research. Methods Culture can be defined as shared cognitive structures and consensus around culturally correct values, attitudes, and normative behaviors. This mixed-methods study employs CCA to assess construct validity and empirically determine a set of underlying socially learned and shared notions about the cultural domain of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research. The study will include three phases: (a) qualitative data collection and analysis to define the cultural domain of interdisciplinary collaborations in nursing research; (b) validation of the CCA tool with the use of cultural knowledge statements; and (c) application of the CCA tool to assess cultural differences among nursing trainees, junior faculty, and training directors. The study participant pool consists of National Institutes of Health–National Institute of Nursing Research awardees, including training directors of institutional training grants, pre- and postdoctoral trainees with individual fellowship training grants, and junior faculty with career development awards. Qualitative data will be analyzed to formulate cultural statements about the values and behaviors that promote interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research. Subsequent survey data will be assessed using matrix algebra, principal component analysis, and the Stuart–Maxwell Marginal Homogeneity Test. Discussion The development and validation of a CCA tool is a novel approach to assess, support, and systematically examine interdisciplinary collaboration and team science in nursing research and training. However, the investigation of culture needs to remain value neutral, refrain from being prescriptive, and be sensitive to the emergence and dominance of one “right” culture.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Culture of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Nursing Research Training
Description:
Background Establishing and maintaining collaborative scientific environments that can cultivate and benefit from a full range of talents is essential for the quality and influence of science.
Inclusion of research training and career development interventions to expose nursing PhD students, postdocs, and junior faculty to team science stands to prepare graduates to effectively engage with interdisciplinary colleagues to conduct cutting-edge nursing research and compete successfully for precious research resources.
To be effective, nursing research workforce development programs need to recognize and share a culture of interdisciplinarity.
Objectives This project aims to develop, validate, and disseminate a theoretically grounded and methodologically rigorous tool for a cultural consensus analysis (CCA) of the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research.
Methods Culture can be defined as shared cognitive structures and consensus around culturally correct values, attitudes, and normative behaviors.
This mixed-methods study employs CCA to assess construct validity and empirically determine a set of underlying socially learned and shared notions about the cultural domain of interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research.
The study will include three phases: (a) qualitative data collection and analysis to define the cultural domain of interdisciplinary collaborations in nursing research; (b) validation of the CCA tool with the use of cultural knowledge statements; and (c) application of the CCA tool to assess cultural differences among nursing trainees, junior faculty, and training directors.
The study participant pool consists of National Institutes of Health–National Institute of Nursing Research awardees, including training directors of institutional training grants, pre- and postdoctoral trainees with individual fellowship training grants, and junior faculty with career development awards.
Qualitative data will be analyzed to formulate cultural statements about the values and behaviors that promote interdisciplinary collaboration in nursing research.
Subsequent survey data will be assessed using matrix algebra, principal component analysis, and the Stuart–Maxwell Marginal Homogeneity Test.
Discussion The development and validation of a CCA tool is a novel approach to assess, support, and systematically examine interdisciplinary collaboration and team science in nursing research and training.
However, the investigation of culture needs to remain value neutral, refrain from being prescriptive, and be sensitive to the emergence and dominance of one “right” culture.

Related Results

Developing a Mobile Learning Virtual Nursing Diagnosis (VND) Media for Medical Surgical Nursing Course
Developing a Mobile Learning Virtual Nursing Diagnosis (VND) Media for Medical Surgical Nursing Course
Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/4zHCrIC1IGE   Background:  The development of innovative and technology-aligned learning media is a necessary solution for nursing students...
Novel Nursing Terminologies for the Rapid Response System
Novel Nursing Terminologies for the Rapid Response System
PURPOSE.  Nursing terminology with implications for the rapid response system (RRS) is introduced and proposed: critical incident nursing diagnosis (CIND), defined as the recogniti...
Nursing as concrete philosophy, Part I: Risjord on nursing knowledge
Nursing as concrete philosophy, Part I: Risjord on nursing knowledge
AbstractThis essay addresses the problem of the essentiality of nursing knowledge and what kind of theory, if any, is essential to nursing practice. The overarching aim of the essa...
Nursing Education
Nursing Education
Histories of nursing education typically date to the introduction of formal trained nursing in western Europe and North America in the late nineteenth century. White women reformer...
Cenário da enfermagem forense na formação do enfermeiro na assistência e na pesquisa
Cenário da enfermagem forense na formação do enfermeiro na assistência e na pesquisa
Objetivo: analisar como o cenário da enfermagem forense contribui para a formação do enfermeiro na assistência e na pesquisa. Método: trata-se de uma revisão integrativa, sendo uti...
Effects of the Humanized Nursing Model in Obstetric Nursing Based on the Use and Gratification Theory
Effects of the Humanized Nursing Model in Obstetric Nursing Based on the Use and Gratification Theory
Objective: To explore the application effect of the humanized nursing model in obstetric nursing based on the use and gratification theory. Methods: A total of 148 parturients who...
Living nursing values: A collective case study
Living nursing values: A collective case study
<p>Distinctive humanistic values are foundational in professional nursing practice, commonly shared by members of the profession and the mainstay of how nurses act. The found...
Reasons for entering and leaving nursing: an Australian regional study
Reasons for entering and leaving nursing: an Australian regional study
Objective: To compare and contrast the reasons that nurses and nursing students provide for entering and leaving nursing. Design: A quantitative cross‑sectional cohort design with...

Back to Top