Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Nepafenac in the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery (Pseudophakic Macular Oedema) – an Update
View through CrossRef
Cataract surgery is a hugely important means of preventing poor-quality vision or vision loss, especially in the elderly and people with diabetes. Pseudophakic macular oedema (PMO) is a comparatively infrequent complication occurring in 0.2–2.35% of patients, but the increasing scale of cataract surgeries worldwide makes it a widespread and significant problem. PMO can affect vision and, if untreated, can damage the retina and, less commonly, cause pain. Effective and convenient treatment for PMO, therefore, is an important issue. The pathophysiology of PMO is not fully understood, but may result from multiple factors including traction, irritation and disturbance of the blood-retinal barrier, leading to secretion of inflammatory factors which affect the posterior segment. Among the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used in the management of PMO is nepafenac (NPF). NPF is a unique prodrug and use of the 0.1% formulation given three times daily is supported by several key phase II and III clinical trials, in which prophylactic use resulted in lower incidence of PMO, better visual outcomes and lower central subfield macular thickness than vehicle alone. Several studies have also shown that 0.1% NPF provided superior efficacy compared with bromfenac, fluorometholone or ketorolac in the treatment of PMO. More recently, a 0.3% NPF formulation has been developed to provide more convenient once daily dosing. A phase III trial (n=819) showed that 0.3% NPF was non-inferior to 0.1% NPF in terms of inflammation and proportion or patients who were pain-free with similar safety profiles for both doses. Other evidence from phase II and III vehicle-controlled, non-comparative trials also indicate the equivalence of frequent 0.1% NPF and the less frequent 0.3% NPF dosing. Greater use of the more convenient 0.3% NPF formulation may help improve patient adherence and consequently provide better outcomes in PMO.
Title: Nepafenac in the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery (Pseudophakic Macular Oedema) – an Update
Description:
Cataract surgery is a hugely important means of preventing poor-quality vision or vision loss, especially in the elderly and people with diabetes.
Pseudophakic macular oedema (PMO) is a comparatively infrequent complication occurring in 0.
2–2.
35% of patients, but the increasing scale of cataract surgeries worldwide makes it a widespread and significant problem.
PMO can affect vision and, if untreated, can damage the retina and, less commonly, cause pain.
Effective and convenient treatment for PMO, therefore, is an important issue.
The pathophysiology of PMO is not fully understood, but may result from multiple factors including traction, irritation and disturbance of the blood-retinal barrier, leading to secretion of inflammatory factors which affect the posterior segment.
Among the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used in the management of PMO is nepafenac (NPF).
NPF is a unique prodrug and use of the 0.
1% formulation given three times daily is supported by several key phase II and III clinical trials, in which prophylactic use resulted in lower incidence of PMO, better visual outcomes and lower central subfield macular thickness than vehicle alone.
Several studies have also shown that 0.
1% NPF provided superior efficacy compared with bromfenac, fluorometholone or ketorolac in the treatment of PMO.
More recently, a 0.
3% NPF formulation has been developed to provide more convenient once daily dosing.
A phase III trial (n=819) showed that 0.
3% NPF was non-inferior to 0.
1% NPF in terms of inflammation and proportion or patients who were pain-free with similar safety profiles for both doses.
Other evidence from phase II and III vehicle-controlled, non-comparative trials also indicate the equivalence of frequent 0.
1% NPF and the less frequent 0.
3% NPF dosing.
Greater use of the more convenient 0.
3% NPF formulation may help improve patient adherence and consequently provide better outcomes in PMO.
Related Results
<b>BROMFENAC VERSUS NEPAFENAC: A STUDY ON MANAGING POST-OPERATIVE CATARACT INFLAMMATION</b>
<b>BROMFENAC VERSUS NEPAFENAC: A STUDY ON MANAGING POST-OPERATIVE CATARACT INFLAMMATION</b>
Background: Postoperative inflammation is a common complication after cataract surgery. NSAIDs, such as bromfenac and Nepafenac, are commonly used to manage this inflammation due t...
The added effect of preoperative nepafenac on pain and discomfort following alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy
The added effect of preoperative nepafenac on pain and discomfort following alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy
Purpose:
To evaluate the effect of preoperative nepafenac on pain following alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
...
The impact of cataract surgery on tear film physiology: signs and symptoms, progression and treatment
The impact of cataract surgery on tear film physiology: signs and symptoms, progression and treatment
PurposeThis study aimed to revise data published in the literature on the effects of cataract surgery on tear film characteristics, in relation to personal clinical surgical experi...
A Comparison of Topical Nepafenac with Ketorolac Tromethamine in Maintaining Pupilary Dilatation during Phacoemulsification
A Comparison of Topical Nepafenac with Ketorolac Tromethamine in Maintaining Pupilary Dilatation during Phacoemulsification
Background: The standard surgical procedure for cataract surgery now a days is phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, that gives excellent visual results. S...
CORRELATION BETWEEN GLYCOSYLATED HAEMOGLOBIN (HBA1C) LEVEL AND MACULAR THICKNESS IN TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS IN TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.
CORRELATION BETWEEN GLYCOSYLATED HAEMOGLOBIN (HBA1C) LEVEL AND MACULAR THICKNESS IN TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS IN TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.
Aim : To correlate HbA1c level with macular thickness in type 2 diabetic patients to determine the impact
of blood sugar control on retina. Methods : This cross-sectional study was...
Macular oedema after uncomplicated phacoemulsification
Macular oedema after uncomplicated phacoemulsification
Background: Recent development of cataract surgery has led to the improvement of visual outcomes. However, pseudophakic cystoid macular oedema (CME), which is also known as Irvine–...
Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes Compared With Triple-DMEK at 1-Year Follow-up
Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes Compared With Triple-DMEK at 1-Year Follow-up
Purpose:
To compare the survival rate 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic eyes versus combined phacoemulsification and DMEK (...
Phacoemulsification in trabeculectomized eyes
Phacoemulsification in trabeculectomized eyes
Abstract.Purpose: To evaluate retrospectively risk indicators for cataract surgery and the effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure (IOP) control in eyes that have u...

