Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Seismic Discrimination Between Nuclear Explosions and Natural Earthquakes using Multi-Machine Learning Techniques

View through CrossRef
AbstractIn the field of seismic signal analysis, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate between earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions. As a contribution for the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), Various methods have been employed for this purpose, including Complexity, Spectral ratio, mb—Ms (body wave and surface wave magnitudes), and corner frequency of P and S waves. These discrimination techniques have been examined to manually identify natural seismic events from nuclear explosions across different regions worldwide, such as China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and the United States. To gather the necessary data, a comprehensive dataset comprising nuclear explosions and earthquakes of the same magnitude range (4 ≤ mb ≤ 6.5) of 35 seismic events from 1945 to 2017 has been compiled from the International Research Institute for Seismology (IRIS) using broadband and long period seismic stations. The objective of this study is to employ a range of linear and nonlinear Machine Learning (ML) models with the aim of automatically distinguishing between underground nuclear explosions and large earthquakes to enhance the accuracy of manual feature extraction. For this purpose, time domain waveforms and different classifier techniques focused on feature extraction have been used. The ML models employed include logistic regression, K-nearest neighbours classifier, decision tree classifier, random forest classifier, voting classifier, and Naive Bayes. The outcomes of the ROC and AUC analyses were employed to validate the validity of our proposed discrimination algorithm. The results show that the Random Forest Classifier is the most effective model, obtaining 100% accuracy in the case of feature extraction, while the best model for the time domain waveform classifier that achieved 75.5% accuracy is the voting classifier.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Seismic Discrimination Between Nuclear Explosions and Natural Earthquakes using Multi-Machine Learning Techniques
Description:
AbstractIn the field of seismic signal analysis, it is of utmost importance to accurately differentiate between earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions.
As a contribution for the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), Various methods have been employed for this purpose, including Complexity, Spectral ratio, mb—Ms (body wave and surface wave magnitudes), and corner frequency of P and S waves.
These discrimination techniques have been examined to manually identify natural seismic events from nuclear explosions across different regions worldwide, such as China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and the United States.
To gather the necessary data, a comprehensive dataset comprising nuclear explosions and earthquakes of the same magnitude range (4 ≤ mb ≤ 6.
5) of 35 seismic events from 1945 to 2017 has been compiled from the International Research Institute for Seismology (IRIS) using broadband and long period seismic stations.
The objective of this study is to employ a range of linear and nonlinear Machine Learning (ML) models with the aim of automatically distinguishing between underground nuclear explosions and large earthquakes to enhance the accuracy of manual feature extraction.
For this purpose, time domain waveforms and different classifier techniques focused on feature extraction have been used.
The ML models employed include logistic regression, K-nearest neighbours classifier, decision tree classifier, random forest classifier, voting classifier, and Naive Bayes.
The outcomes of the ROC and AUC analyses were employed to validate the validity of our proposed discrimination algorithm.
The results show that the Random Forest Classifier is the most effective model, obtaining 100% accuracy in the case of feature extraction, while the best model for the time domain waveform classifier that achieved 75.
5% accuracy is the voting classifier.

Related Results

The Autoignition of Nuclear Reactor Power Plant Explosions
The Autoignition of Nuclear Reactor Power Plant Explosions
Abstract Explosive research proves that there is a common cause for most explosions in nuclear reactor power plants during normal operations and accident conditions....
Identification of natural and technogenic seismic events by energy characteristics
Identification of natural and technogenic seismic events by energy characteristics
One of the key problems of seismic monitoring is the identification of earthquakes and signals from technogenic sources detected by a network of seismic stations. In peacetime, tec...
Seismic hazards along the Longmen Shan fault: Insights from stress transfer between major earthquakes and regional b value
Seismic hazards along the Longmen Shan fault: Insights from stress transfer between major earthquakes and regional b value
Abstract There are two seismic gaps (Dayi seismic gap and Tianquan-Kangding seismic gap) on the Longmen Shan fault (LMSF), despite the successively occurrence of the 2008 M...
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Seismic Frequency Enhancement for Mapping and Reservoir Characterization of Arab Formation: Case Study Onshore UAE
Abstract Mapping and discrimination of Upper Jurassic Arab reservoirs (Arab A/B/C and D) in this 3D seismic onshore field of Abu Dhabi, is very sensitive to the seis...
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
4D Seismic on Gullfaks
SUMMARY New technologies are rapidly emerging helping to obtain optimal drainage of large reservoirs. 4D seismic is such a reservoir monitoring technique. The phy...
General classification of seismic protection systems of buildings and structures
General classification of seismic protection systems of buildings and structures
The issues of ensuring the seismic resistance of buildings and structures hold a leading position despite significant achievements in this area. This is confirmed by the significan...
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Integrated Hydrocarbon Detection Based on Full Frequency Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
Abstract To improve the accuracy of hydrocarbon detection, seismic amplitude variation with offset (AVO), seismic amplitude variation with frequency (AVF), and direc...
Total Electron Content and Seismic Ambient Noise analysis prior to significant earthquakes
Total Electron Content and Seismic Ambient Noise analysis prior to significant earthquakes
<p>The seismo-ionospheric interaction study with respect to earthquake events using Total Electron Content (TEC) data derived from Global Navigation Satellite Systems...

Back to Top