Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ISO 17166:1999(F)/CIE S 007/F-1998 Spectre d'action �ryth�male de r�f�rence et dose �ryth�male normalis�e

View through CrossRef
The CIE undertook a major review of its official recommendations on photobiological effects, their dose relationships and measurement. Based on these investigations the present standard describes present day knowledge of the erythemal effect.-\n--\n-The problem of dosimetry in skin photobiology lies in the fact that the ability of ultraviolet (UV) radiation to elicit erythema in human skin depends strongly on wavelength, encompassing a range of four orders of magnitude between 250 nm and 400 nm. Thus a statement that a subject received an exposure dose of 1 J cm-2 (104 J m-2) of UV radiation conveys nothing about the consequences of that exposure in terms of erythema. If the radiation source was a UVA fluorescent lamp, no erythemal response would be seen apart from in people exhibiting severe, abnormal pathological photosensitivity. The same dose delivered from an unfiltered mercury arc lamp or fluorescent sun-lamp would result in marked violaceous erythema in most white skinned individuals. Consequently, photobiologists have long recognised the need to express the exposure as an erythemally-weighted quantity.-\n--\n-Recently the term minimal erythema dose (MED) has been used widely as a 'measure' of erythemal radiation. This is unreasonable because the MED is not a standard measure of anything but, on the contrary, encompasses the variable nature of individual sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation. Variables which affect the MED include optical and radiometric characteristics of the source; determinants of the exposure such as dose increment and field size; nature of the skin such as pigmentation, previous light exposure, and anatomical site; and observational factors such as definition of the end point, time of reading after exposure, and ambient illumination.-\n--\n-To avoid further confusing misuse of the term MED, we propose that this term be reserved solely for observational studies in humans and other animals, and that a new term, the standard erythema dose (SED) be used as a standardized measure of erythemogenic UV radiation.-\n--\n-This Standard specifies the erythema reference action spectrum ser(?), and the Standard Erythema Dose.-\n--\n-This Standard has been approved by the CIE and supersedes the recommendations made in publication CIE 106/4-1993 (reprint from CIE-Journal 6/1, 17-22, 1987) A reference action spectrum for ultraviolet induced erythema in human skin. It has been approved by ISO as a joint ISO/CIE standard.-\n--\n-This Standard may be obtained from the CIE National Committees or the Central Bureau of the CIE. A French (ISO 17166:1999/CIE S 007/F-1998) and a German (CIE S 007/D-1998) version is also available.
International Commission on Illumination (CIE)
Title: ISO 17166:1999(F)/CIE S 007/F-1998 Spectre d'action �ryth�male de r�f�rence et dose �ryth�male normalis�e
Description:
The CIE undertook a major review of its official recommendations on photobiological effects, their dose relationships and measurement.
Based on these investigations the present standard describes present day knowledge of the erythemal effect.
-\n--\n-The problem of dosimetry in skin photobiology lies in the fact that the ability of ultraviolet (UV) radiation to elicit erythema in human skin depends strongly on wavelength, encompassing a range of four orders of magnitude between 250 nm and 400 nm.
Thus a statement that a subject received an exposure dose of 1 J cm-2 (104 J m-2) of UV radiation conveys nothing about the consequences of that exposure in terms of erythema.
If the radiation source was a UVA fluorescent lamp, no erythemal response would be seen apart from in people exhibiting severe, abnormal pathological photosensitivity.
The same dose delivered from an unfiltered mercury arc lamp or fluorescent sun-lamp would result in marked violaceous erythema in most white skinned individuals.
Consequently, photobiologists have long recognised the need to express the exposure as an erythemally-weighted quantity.
-\n--\n-Recently the term minimal erythema dose (MED) has been used widely as a 'measure' of erythemal radiation.
This is unreasonable because the MED is not a standard measure of anything but, on the contrary, encompasses the variable nature of individual sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation.
Variables which affect the MED include optical and radiometric characteristics of the source; determinants of the exposure such as dose increment and field size; nature of the skin such as pigmentation, previous light exposure, and anatomical site; and observational factors such as definition of the end point, time of reading after exposure, and ambient illumination.
-\n--\n-To avoid further confusing misuse of the term MED, we propose that this term be reserved solely for observational studies in humans and other animals, and that a new term, the standard erythema dose (SED) be used as a standardized measure of erythemogenic UV radiation.
-\n--\n-This Standard specifies the erythema reference action spectrum ser(?), and the Standard Erythema Dose.
-\n--\n-This Standard has been approved by the CIE and supersedes the recommendations made in publication CIE 106/4-1993 (reprint from CIE-Journal 6/1, 17-22, 1987) A reference action spectrum for ultraviolet induced erythema in human skin.
It has been approved by ISO as a joint ISO/CIE standard.
-\n--\n-This Standard may be obtained from the CIE National Committees or the Central Bureau of the CIE.
A French (ISO 17166:1999/CIE S 007/F-1998) and a German (CIE S 007/D-1998) version is also available.

Related Results

Theoretical study of laser-cooled SH<sup>–</sup> anion
Theoretical study of laser-cooled SH<sup>–</sup> anion
The potential energy curves, dipole moments, and transition dipole moments for the <inline-formula><tex-math id="M13">\begin{document}${{\rm{X}}^1}{\Sigma ^ + }$\end{do...
CIE 009-1963 History of the CIE
CIE 009-1963 History of the CIE
Superseded by: -\n-CIE 082-1990 CIE History 1913-1988-\n--\n- -\n--\n-In 1963, the history of the first 50 years of the CIE together with the 13 years of its predecessor, the CIP, ...
CIE 082-1990 CIE History 1913 - 1988
CIE 082-1990 CIE History 1913 - 1988
Supersedes: -\n-CIE 009-1963 History of the CIE-\n--\n- -\n--\n-In 1963, the history of the first 50 years of the CIE together with the 13 years of its predecessor, the CIP, appear...
CIE S 003-1996 CIE Standard Overcast Sky and Clear Sky
CIE S 003-1996 CIE Standard Overcast Sky and Clear Sky
Superseded by Spatial Distribution of Daylight - CIE Standard General Sky-\n--\n-Joint ISO/CIE Standard-\n--\n-ISO 15469:2004 (E)/CIE S 011/E:2003-\n--\n-CIE has published the Stan...
Standardization in Health and Medical Informatics
Standardization in Health and Medical Informatics
When things go well then often it is because they conform to standards (ISO, 2005). According to the Oxford Dictionary of Modern English, there is a lot of explanation of what stan...
CIE S 014-1:2006 Colorimetry - Part 1: CIE Standard Colorimetric Observers
CIE S 014-1:2006 Colorimetry - Part 1: CIE Standard Colorimetric Observers
Superseded by Colorimetry - Part 1: CIE Standard Colorimetric Observers, 2nd Edition-\n--\n-Joint ISO/CIE Standard-\n--\n-ISO 11664-1:2007(E)/CIE S 014-1/E:2006-\n--\n-This CIE Sta...
Postmodern Puma
Postmodern Puma
Postmodernism is supposed to identify the conditions of contemporary cultural production when human affairs in general, and the dissemination of prevailing ideas in particular, hav...
CIE S 014-5:2009 Colorimetry - Part 5: CIE 1976 L*u*v* Colour Space and u&#039;, v&#039;, Uniform Chromaticity Scale Diagram
CIE S 014-5:2009 Colorimetry - Part 5: CIE 1976 L*u*v* Colour Space and u&#039;, v&#039;, Uniform Chromaticity Scale Diagram
Superseded by Colorimetry - Part 5: CIE 1976 L*u*v* Colour Space and u', v' Uniform Chromaticity Scale Diagram, 2nd Edition-\n--\n-Joint ISO/CIE Standard-\n--\n-ISO 11664-5:2009(E)...

Back to Top