Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Are Humean Laws Flukes?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Most of the recent literature on the metaphysics of laws concerns arguments pro and con Humean and anti-Humean views. This chapter discusses two of the most persistent objections against Humean accounts and especially against Lewis’s Best Systems Account (BSA). The first objection is that Humean laws are too weak to play the explanatory role that laws play in science. The second is that Humean metaphysics makes it surprising that our world contains regularities that are systematizable by a Lewisian best system. In Galen’s words on Humean metaphysics, ‘it would be a fluke’ for the world to be systematizable or for there to be lawful regularities at all. Those who make these objections typically think that they are related, since it is the absence of necessary connections that is responsible both for the alleged explanatory deficiency of Humean laws and for the apparent flukiness of laws on Humeanism.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Are Humean Laws Flukes?
Description:
Abstract Most of the recent literature on the metaphysics of laws concerns arguments pro and con Humean and anti-Humean views.
This chapter discusses two of the most persistent objections against Humean accounts and especially against Lewis’s Best Systems Account (BSA).
The first objection is that Humean laws are too weak to play the explanatory role that laws play in science.
The second is that Humean metaphysics makes it surprising that our world contains regularities that are systematizable by a Lewisian best system.
In Galen’s words on Humean metaphysics, ‘it would be a fluke’ for the world to be systematizable or for there to be lawful regularities at all.
Those who make these objections typically think that they are related, since it is the absence of necessary connections that is responsible both for the alleged explanatory deficiency of Humean laws and for the apparent flukiness of laws on Humeanism.

Related Results

Laws of Nature
Laws of Nature
The discovery of the laws of nature has long been considered a principal aim of science. Of course, many laws that science discovers are not commonly designated “laws.” Alongside B...
How (not) to be a pragmatic Humean
How (not) to be a pragmatic Humean
Abstract Recently, philosophers have argued that the laws of Lewis’s Best System Analysis (BSA) are not pragmatically useful. In this paper, I argue that these criticisms...
Trematodes (flukes)
Trematodes (flukes)
Abstract This chapter consists of short notes, diagrams, maps, and tables to summarize human trematode (‘fluke’) infections, starting with a classification of releva...
Causation
Causation
Two opposed viewpoints raise complementary problems about causation. The first is from Hume: watch the child kick the ball. You see the foot touch the ball and the ball move off. B...
Nordic Laws
Nordic Laws
By the end of the Viking Age, the Nordic region was divided between three kingdoms, all of which still exist in the early twenty-first century, albeit with very different borders, ...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
From Lewisian Chance to Humean Chance
From Lewisian Chance to Humean Chance
Abstract This chapter introduces David Lewis’ highly influential views on objective chance, from his 1980 treatment of objective chance and the Principal Principle (...

Back to Top