Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Urk. Barth 276

View through Europeana Collections
The Heidelberg citizen Barbara, widow of the deceased citizen and Tuchscherer’s Hans Georg Jost, reports that they are receiving almsgiving (Philipp A [d] miraldus, Philipp Ludwig Jordan, Bernhard Rohrer, Johann Gugelmann, Adrian Grugott, Jost Heinrich Bauer, Johann Jakob Grauer, Johann Hermann Schreiner [Arcularius], Johann Christoph Weick, Wilhelm Aldefeld and Johann Konrad Mack) 50 guilders, the guilder to 15 batches or 60 cruisers and the valley to 1 ½ guilder. For this purpose, she has to spend 2 ½ guilders annually on Easter The first payment is due on Easter Sunday 1686. As security She uses her two houses in the Froschau, lying between Neckar Schmidte and the Butcher Hans Georg Wagner’s house, and The estate of the Helbertian heirs. The following stresses lie on the houses: on one guilder against the Neckar Schúele, on the other 50 guilder opposite the Siechenhaus in Au, the city’s leprosorium. Barbara Securing On the other hand, there are no more burdens on the two estates The Should the widow or her heirs remain guilty of interest, the lenders are allowed to use the houses until the The amount of the money spent is balanced. But Barbara or her heirs Amount borrowed together with the (possibly outstanding) annual interest back, so they get the houses again, the deed loses with their Provisions are valid, and all demands from the lenders This is done. The exact modalities are explained by the Statutory texts from Kurpfälzische Landrecht. Announcement of the City seal, which was sent to the widow by the mayors Johann Martin Hill and Johann Georg Gabel without any demands on the The city can be derived.
Heidelberg University Library
image-zoom
Title: Urk. Barth 276
Description:
The Heidelberg citizen Barbara, widow of the deceased citizen and Tuchscherer’s Hans Georg Jost, reports that they are receiving almsgiving (Philipp A [d] miraldus, Philipp Ludwig Jordan, Bernhard Rohrer, Johann Gugelmann, Adrian Grugott, Jost Heinrich Bauer, Johann Jakob Grauer, Johann Hermann Schreiner [Arcularius], Johann Christoph Weick, Wilhelm Aldefeld and Johann Konrad Mack) 50 guilders, the guilder to 15 batches or 60 cruisers and the valley to 1 ½ guilder.
For this purpose, she has to spend 2 ½ guilders annually on Easter The first payment is due on Easter Sunday 1686.
As security She uses her two houses in the Froschau, lying between Neckar Schmidte and the Butcher Hans Georg Wagner’s house, and The estate of the Helbertian heirs.
The following stresses lie on the houses: on one guilder against the Neckar Schúele, on the other 50 guilder opposite the Siechenhaus in Au, the city’s leprosorium.
Barbara Securing On the other hand, there are no more burdens on the two estates The Should the widow or her heirs remain guilty of interest, the lenders are allowed to use the houses until the The amount of the money spent is balanced.
But Barbara or her heirs Amount borrowed together with the (possibly outstanding) annual interest back, so they get the houses again, the deed loses with their Provisions are valid, and all demands from the lenders This is done.
The exact modalities are explained by the Statutory texts from Kurpfälzische Landrecht.
Announcement of the City seal, which was sent to the widow by the mayors Johann Martin Hill and Johann Georg Gabel without any demands on the The city can be derived.

Related Results

Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Urk. Barth 64
Urk. Barth 64
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther, Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Urk. Barth 63
Urk. Barth 63
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther, Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Barth and Patristic Theology
Barth and Patristic Theology
This chapter examines Barth’s approach to patristic theology as well as his engagement with key doctrines and councils of the patristic era. It is clear in relation to Barth’s use ...

Back to Top