Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Profile in Cowardice? Hobbes, Personation, and the Trinity
View through CrossRef
This chapter addresses the development of Hobbes’s political theology during the 1660s, particularly in the Appendices to his Latin translation of Leviathan. It challenges the widely held view that Hobbes adapted his views through fear of being arraigned for heresy after his being named during parliamentary proceedings on the Atheism Bill. Hobbes was not in serious danger of being tried for heresy. Regardless of whether he took the risk seriously, Hobbes uninhibitedly restated controversial theological doctrine, notably in applying his theory of personation to the Trinity, and in certain respects made his position more rather than less radical. There is little interpretative merit in juxtaposing the English Leviathan of 1651 with the Latin version of 1668, and assuming that the latter aimed to accommodate resurgent Restoration Anglicanism. The wider moral is to beware of applying personal or political context too mechanically to the historical interpretation of philosophical texts.
Title: A Profile in Cowardice? Hobbes, Personation, and the Trinity
Description:
This chapter addresses the development of Hobbes’s political theology during the 1660s, particularly in the Appendices to his Latin translation of Leviathan.
It challenges the widely held view that Hobbes adapted his views through fear of being arraigned for heresy after his being named during parliamentary proceedings on the Atheism Bill.
Hobbes was not in serious danger of being tried for heresy.
Regardless of whether he took the risk seriously, Hobbes uninhibitedly restated controversial theological doctrine, notably in applying his theory of personation to the Trinity, and in certain respects made his position more rather than less radical.
There is little interpretative merit in juxtaposing the English Leviathan of 1651 with the Latin version of 1668, and assuming that the latter aimed to accommodate resurgent Restoration Anglicanism.
The wider moral is to beware of applying personal or political context too mechanically to the historical interpretation of philosophical texts.
Related Results
Hobbes on Sex
Hobbes on Sex
Abstract
Contemporary scholars have largely dismissed Hobbes’s brief, and somewhat scattered, remarks about gender and sexuality as peripheral to his central concern...
Thomas Hobbes and Political Thought in Ireland c.1660- c.1730
Thomas Hobbes and Political Thought in Ireland c.1660- c.1730
Abstract
This is a history of political thought in Ireland c.1660–1730, told from the perspective of the reception in that country of Thomas Hobbes, the English phil...
Historical Dictionary of Hobbes's Philosophy
Historical Dictionary of Hobbes's Philosophy
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) is one of the most important early modern thinkers. Though Hobbes is best known forLeviathan(1651) and the theory of absolute sovereignty, his works discu...
Hobbes on Justice
Hobbes on Justice
Abstract
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) is widely regarded as one of the most important political thinkers in the western tradition. Justice is one of the main political ...
Deus Trinitas
Deus Trinitas
Abstract
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in the doctrine of the Trinity, following a long period in which it was considered irrelevant to the rest of...
Hobbes's Theory of Will
Hobbes's Theory of Will
In Hobbes's Theory of the Will, Jurgen Overhoff reveals the religious, ethical, and political consequences of Thomas Hobbes's doctrine of volition. The author gracefully describes ...
Mosaic Leviathan
Mosaic Leviathan
This chapter defends three connected claims. First, we can account for Hobbes’s turn towards the Hebrew Bible by understanding the place of biblical Israel in the political and rel...
First Impressions
First Impressions
The metaphor of ‘imprinting’ used to describe the process of education in Leviathan has long captured the imagination of commentators inclined to view Hobbes as a harbinger of mode...

