Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Profile in Cowardice? Hobbes, Personation, and the Trinity
View through CrossRef
This chapter addresses the development of Hobbes’s political theology during the 1660s, particularly in the Appendices to his Latin translation of Leviathan. It challenges the widely held view that Hobbes adapted his views through fear of being arraigned for heresy after his being named during parliamentary proceedings on the Atheism Bill. Hobbes was not in serious danger of being tried for heresy. Regardless of whether he took the risk seriously, Hobbes uninhibitedly restated controversial theological doctrine, notably in applying his theory of personation to the Trinity, and in certain respects made his position more rather than less radical. There is little interpretative merit in juxtaposing the English Leviathan of 1651 with the Latin version of 1668, and assuming that the latter aimed to accommodate resurgent Restoration Anglicanism. The wider moral is to beware of applying personal or political context too mechanically to the historical interpretation of philosophical texts.
Title: A Profile in Cowardice? Hobbes, Personation, and the Trinity
Description:
This chapter addresses the development of Hobbes’s political theology during the 1660s, particularly in the Appendices to his Latin translation of Leviathan.
It challenges the widely held view that Hobbes adapted his views through fear of being arraigned for heresy after his being named during parliamentary proceedings on the Atheism Bill.
Hobbes was not in serious danger of being tried for heresy.
Regardless of whether he took the risk seriously, Hobbes uninhibitedly restated controversial theological doctrine, notably in applying his theory of personation to the Trinity, and in certain respects made his position more rather than less radical.
There is little interpretative merit in juxtaposing the English Leviathan of 1651 with the Latin version of 1668, and assuming that the latter aimed to accommodate resurgent Restoration Anglicanism.
The wider moral is to beware of applying personal or political context too mechanically to the historical interpretation of philosophical texts.
Related Results
Hobbes on Sex
Hobbes on Sex
Abstract
Contemporary scholars have largely dismissed Hobbes’s brief, and somewhat scattered, remarks about gender and sexuality as peripheral to his central concern...
Hobbes on Justice
Hobbes on Justice
Abstract
Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) is widely regarded as one of the most important political thinkers in the western tradition. Justice is one of the main political ...
The Theocratic Leviathan
The Theocratic Leviathan
Hobbes’s views on church–state relations go well beyond Erastianism. Rather than claiming that the state holds supremacy over the church, Hobbes argued that church and state are id...
Deus Trinitas
Deus Trinitas
Abstract
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in the doctrine of the Trinity, following a long period in which it was considered irrelevant to the rest of...
Hobbes's Theory of Will
Hobbes's Theory of Will
In Hobbes's Theory of the Will, Jurgen Overhoff reveals the religious, ethical, and political consequences of Thomas Hobbes's doctrine of volition. The author gracefully describes ...
Mosaic Leviathan
Mosaic Leviathan
This chapter defends three connected claims. First, we can account for Hobbes’s turn towards the Hebrew Bible by understanding the place of biblical Israel in the political and rel...
Devil in the Details
Devil in the Details
This chapter documents where and how Hobbes’s scriptural quotations diverged from contemporary translations of the Bible. While Hobbes usually relied on these translations, it reve...
Introduction
Introduction
The introduction contends that text and context are inseparable and that Hobbes takes on the character and persona of those who appropriate him for purposes of exploitation, or den...

