Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Needling and Revision Complications

View through CrossRef
Needle revision refers to a surgical procedure in which a fine gauge needle or needle-knife is used to incise scar tissue in the vicinity of a filtration opening. Initially described for temporary relief of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in the case of encapsulated filtering blebs, needle revision has been used to establish flow in the setting of a nonexistent bleb, enhance aqueous flow when a bleb is present, and to alter tectonic features of a filtration bleb. Among the many advantages of needle revision are rapidity, low cost (especially when performed in the office), minimal preparation, and rapid recovery. Compared to full surgical revision, needle revision involves relatively little disruption of tissue, resulting in minimal inflammation. Needle revision can be used to rearrange bleb architecture to decrease bleb height, a bleb morphology that is associated with corneal dellen and dysesthesia (see Chapters 18 and 19). Flow can be redirected using needle revision to reduce flow through bleb leaks, which may result in closure and/or prevent reformation of “overhanging” blebs. Although incision of relatively thin scar tissue with a needle establishes fluid flow, scar reformation is likely to occur without some sort of inhibition of scar formation. The introduction of antifibrotics, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC), and antiangiogenics, such as bevacizumab, have enhanced our ability to prevent reformation of scar tissue. Needle revision is a useful procedure that can revise bleb architecture and redirect fluid flow with little inflammation. Understanding complications associated with this procedure is important for an ultimately successful glaucoma procedure. Needle revision can be performed in a variety of settings: the operating room, complete with the operating microscope, full preparation, and draping; the office minor procedure room using the operating microscope; or even at the slit lamp in the examination lane. Procedure time, cost, and equipment preference and availability are among other factors that may influence the choice of venue. Anesthesia methods also vary. Topical anesthesia, subconjunctival block, and retrobulbar injection can all be used. Generally, topical anesthesia with viscous lidocaine is adequate in most patients.
Title: Needling and Revision Complications
Description:
Needle revision refers to a surgical procedure in which a fine gauge needle or needle-knife is used to incise scar tissue in the vicinity of a filtration opening.
Initially described for temporary relief of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in the case of encapsulated filtering blebs, needle revision has been used to establish flow in the setting of a nonexistent bleb, enhance aqueous flow when a bleb is present, and to alter tectonic features of a filtration bleb.
Among the many advantages of needle revision are rapidity, low cost (especially when performed in the office), minimal preparation, and rapid recovery.
Compared to full surgical revision, needle revision involves relatively little disruption of tissue, resulting in minimal inflammation.
Needle revision can be used to rearrange bleb architecture to decrease bleb height, a bleb morphology that is associated with corneal dellen and dysesthesia (see Chapters 18 and 19).
Flow can be redirected using needle revision to reduce flow through bleb leaks, which may result in closure and/or prevent reformation of “overhanging” blebs.
Although incision of relatively thin scar tissue with a needle establishes fluid flow, scar reformation is likely to occur without some sort of inhibition of scar formation.
The introduction of antifibrotics, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC), and antiangiogenics, such as bevacizumab, have enhanced our ability to prevent reformation of scar tissue.
Needle revision is a useful procedure that can revise bleb architecture and redirect fluid flow with little inflammation.
Understanding complications associated with this procedure is important for an ultimately successful glaucoma procedure.
Needle revision can be performed in a variety of settings: the operating room, complete with the operating microscope, full preparation, and draping; the office minor procedure room using the operating microscope; or even at the slit lamp in the examination lane.
Procedure time, cost, and equipment preference and availability are among other factors that may influence the choice of venue.
Anesthesia methods also vary.
Topical anesthesia, subconjunctival block, and retrobulbar injection can all be used.
Generally, topical anesthesia with viscous lidocaine is adequate in most patients.

Related Results

The Emergence of Dry Needling in Stroke Rehabilitation
The Emergence of Dry Needling in Stroke Rehabilitation
The management of stroke, acute revascularization and rehabilitation techniques have taken a giant leap in the current decade. The presence of neurological deficits, spasticity and...
Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Stretching in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Stretching in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is characterized by widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and a range of psychosomatic symptoms. Non-pharmaco...
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Cupping Therapy for Pain in Piriformis Syndrome
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Cupping Therapy for Pain in Piriformis Syndrome
Background: Piriformis syndrome is characterized by discomfort in the buttocks and throughout the course of the sciatic nerve. Dry needling modulates pain perception, disrupts pain...
Can Dry Needling Technique Replace Cervical Manipulation Technique for Patients with Migraine
Can Dry Needling Technique Replace Cervical Manipulation Technique for Patients with Migraine
Background of the study: Migraine is a renowned medical condition in 15% of general population. The patients with migraine exhibited active Trigger Points in their neck extensor mu...
DRY NEEDLING AND NEURAL MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN RADIAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
DRY NEEDLING AND NEURAL MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN RADIAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Background: Radial nerve entrapment is a common peripheral neuropathy that leads to pain, muscle weakness, and functional impairment. Various conservative treatments, including dry...

Back to Top