Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Mīmāṃsā
View through CrossRef
The school of Mīmāṃsā or Pūrva Mīmāṃsā was one of the six systems of classical Hindu philosophy. It grew out of the Indian science of exegesis and was primarily concerned with defending the way of life defined by the ancient scripture of Hinduism, the Veda. Its most important exponents, Śabarasvāmin, Prabhākara and Kumārila, lived in the sixth and seventh centuries ad. It was realist and empiricist in orientation. Its central doctrine was that the Veda is the sole means of knowledge of dharma or righteousness, because it is eternal. All cognition, it held, is valid unless its cause is defective. The Veda being without any fallible author, human or divine, the cognitions to which it gives rise must be true. The Veda must be authorless because there is no recollection of an author or any other evidence of its having been composed; we only observe that it has been handed down from generation to generation. Mīmāṃsā thinkers also defended various metaphysical ideas implied by the Veda – in particular, the reality of the physical world and the immortality of the soul. However, they denied the existence of God as creator of the world and author of scripture. The eternality of the Veda implies the eternality of language in general. Words and the letters that constitute them are eternal and ubiquitous; it is only their particular manifestations, caused by articulations of the vocal organs, that are restricted to certain times and places. The meanings of words, being universals, are eternal as well. Finally, the relation between word and meaning is also eternal. Every word has an inherent capacity to indicate its meaning. Words could not be expressive of certain meanings as a result of artificial conventions.
The basic orientation of Mīmāṃsā was pragmatic and anti-mystical. It believed that happiness and salvation result just from carrying out the prescriptions of the Veda, not from the practice of yoga or insight into the One. It criticized particularly sharply other scriptural traditions (Buddhism and Jainism) that claimed to have originated from omniscient preceptors.
Title: Mīmāṃsā
Description:
The school of Mīmāṃsā or Pūrva Mīmāṃsā was one of the six systems of classical Hindu philosophy.
It grew out of the Indian science of exegesis and was primarily concerned with defending the way of life defined by the ancient scripture of Hinduism, the Veda.
Its most important exponents, Śabarasvāmin, Prabhākara and Kumārila, lived in the sixth and seventh centuries ad.
It was realist and empiricist in orientation.
Its central doctrine was that the Veda is the sole means of knowledge of dharma or righteousness, because it is eternal.
All cognition, it held, is valid unless its cause is defective.
The Veda being without any fallible author, human or divine, the cognitions to which it gives rise must be true.
The Veda must be authorless because there is no recollection of an author or any other evidence of its having been composed; we only observe that it has been handed down from generation to generation.
Mīmāṃsā thinkers also defended various metaphysical ideas implied by the Veda – in particular, the reality of the physical world and the immortality of the soul.
However, they denied the existence of God as creator of the world and author of scripture.
The eternality of the Veda implies the eternality of language in general.
Words and the letters that constitute them are eternal and ubiquitous; it is only their particular manifestations, caused by articulations of the vocal organs, that are restricted to certain times and places.
The meanings of words, being universals, are eternal as well.
Finally, the relation between word and meaning is also eternal.
Every word has an inherent capacity to indicate its meaning.
Words could not be expressive of certain meanings as a result of artificial conventions.
The basic orientation of Mīmāṃsā was pragmatic and anti-mystical.
It believed that happiness and salvation result just from carrying out the prescriptions of the Veda, not from the practice of yoga or insight into the One.
It criticized particularly sharply other scriptural traditions (Buddhism and Jainism) that claimed to have originated from omniscient preceptors.
Related Results
Mīmāṃsā deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach
Mīmāṃsā deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach
AbstractOver the course of more than two millennia the philosophical school of Mīmāṃsā has thoroughly analyzed normative statements. In this paper we approach a formalization of th...
Yoga Mīmāṃsā: Journal of Science and Culture in Yoga (YMJSCY) – A Review of the First Scientific Yoga Journal
Yoga Mīmāṃsā: Journal of Science and Culture in Yoga (YMJSCY) – A Review of the First Scientific Yoga Journal
BACKGROUND: Scientific journals play a central role in validating and disseminating research through peer review. For much of history, yoga was viewed primarily as a spiritual disc...
Mīmāṁsā Darśana dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Ajaran Agama Hindu di Bali
Mīmāṁsā Darśana dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Ajaran Agama Hindu di Bali
<p><em>Darśana is not just speculation or conjecture, but it has a very sublime, noble, distinctive and systematic value based on mystical spiritual experience. Nava da...
Difficult Remainders
Difficult Remainders
Francis X. Clooney, S.J., aims to break new ground in his ongoing series of instances of a Christian comparative theology engaging Hinduism, by showing how comparative theology, do...
Integral Yoga - A new yoga
Integral Yoga - A new yoga
Background:
Many new systems of yoga have emerged in India in the last few centuries. Their uniqueness lies in their distinct philosophy and methods. Clear understandin...
Transconstructive Generative Ideation: Quantum Logic, Anavastha and Ajātivāda
Transconstructive Generative Ideation: Quantum Logic, Anavastha and Ajātivāda
In this paper, we explore the intersection of quantum logic, Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS), and pedagogical innovations to propose a paradigm shift in knowledge generation and edu...
Testimony in Indian philosophy
Testimony in Indian philosophy
A prominent topic in Indian epistemology is śābdapramāṇa, knowledge derived from linguistic utterance or testimony. The classical material is extensive and varied, initially concer...
Diverse dimensions of Yoga
Diverse dimensions of Yoga
Yoga is a word very commonly used in the world today and carries various connotations depending on its usage. It has been defined in various manners as an art and science, as well ...

