Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fiscal Policy and Current Account Dynamics in the Case of Pakistan
View through CrossRef
The relationship between fiscal policy and the current account
has long attracted interest among academic economists and policymakers
after introduction of the standard intertemporal model of the current
account by Sachs (1981) and its extension by Obstfeld and Rogoff, (1995)
in open economy macroeconomics. There are two major strands of the
current account literature Mundell-Fleming [Mundell (1968) and Fleming
(1967)] and Ricardian equivalence [Barro (1974, 1989)] to explain such
variations in the deficits. According to Mundell-Fleming model budget
deficits cause current account deficits through stimulating income
growth or exchange rate appreciation [Darrat (1988); Abell (1990);
Bachman (1992) and Bahmani-Oskooee (1992)]. On the other hand, there is
Ricardian view that the financing of budget deficits, either through
reduced taxes or by issuing bond does not alter present value wealth of
private households since both temporarily reduced taxes and issuance of
bonds represent future tax liabilities [Kaufmann, et al. (2002); Evans
(1989); Miller and Russek (1989); Enders and Lee (1990) and Kim (1995)].
The underlying reason is that the effects of fiscal deficits on the
current account depend on the nature of the fiscal imbalance. For
example, in a simple theoretical model in which Ricardian equivalence
holds, a cut in lump sum taxes and the ensuing fiscal deficit would not
affect the current account as the private savings increase will offset
the fiscal deficit but investment will be unchanged. Conversely, a
transitory increase in government spending will increase both the fiscal
deficit and the current account deficit, a case of twin deficits. And a
permanent increase in government spending will have no effects on the
current account while its effects on the fiscal balance will depend on
whether the extra spending is financed right away with taxes (in which
case the fiscal balance is unchanged) or whether it is financed with
debt (future taxes) in which case the fiscal balance worsens. Thus,
fiscal deficit may or may not lead to current account deficits depending
on the nature and persistence of the fiscal shock. There is also a third
scenario relate to Recardian view that portrays the possibility of
negative relationship between the deficits where, for example, output
shock give rise to endogenous movements and two deficits are
divergent.
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics
Title: Fiscal Policy and Current Account Dynamics in the Case of
Pakistan
Description:
The relationship between fiscal policy and the current account
has long attracted interest among academic economists and policymakers
after introduction of the standard intertemporal model of the current
account by Sachs (1981) and its extension by Obstfeld and Rogoff, (1995)
in open economy macroeconomics.
There are two major strands of the
current account literature Mundell-Fleming [Mundell (1968) and Fleming
(1967)] and Ricardian equivalence [Barro (1974, 1989)] to explain such
variations in the deficits.
According to Mundell-Fleming model budget
deficits cause current account deficits through stimulating income
growth or exchange rate appreciation [Darrat (1988); Abell (1990);
Bachman (1992) and Bahmani-Oskooee (1992)].
On the other hand, there is
Ricardian view that the financing of budget deficits, either through
reduced taxes or by issuing bond does not alter present value wealth of
private households since both temporarily reduced taxes and issuance of
bonds represent future tax liabilities [Kaufmann, et al.
(2002); Evans
(1989); Miller and Russek (1989); Enders and Lee (1990) and Kim (1995)].
The underlying reason is that the effects of fiscal deficits on the
current account depend on the nature of the fiscal imbalance.
For
example, in a simple theoretical model in which Ricardian equivalence
holds, a cut in lump sum taxes and the ensuing fiscal deficit would not
affect the current account as the private savings increase will offset
the fiscal deficit but investment will be unchanged.
Conversely, a
transitory increase in government spending will increase both the fiscal
deficit and the current account deficit, a case of twin deficits.
And a
permanent increase in government spending will have no effects on the
current account while its effects on the fiscal balance will depend on
whether the extra spending is financed right away with taxes (in which
case the fiscal balance is unchanged) or whether it is financed with
debt (future taxes) in which case the fiscal balance worsens.
Thus,
fiscal deficit may or may not lead to current account deficits depending
on the nature and persistence of the fiscal shock.
There is also a third
scenario relate to Recardian view that portrays the possibility of
negative relationship between the deficits where, for example, output
shock give rise to endogenous movements and two deficits are
divergent.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Relationship between fiscal deficits and unemployment in South Africa
Relationship between fiscal deficits and unemployment in South Africa
Orientation: Heterodox economic scholarship has challenged the neoclassical doctrine that fiscal deficit increases unemployment in the long-term.Research purpose: This article exam...
Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
Alts and Automediality: Compartmentalising the Self through Multiple Social Media Profiles
IntroductionAlt, or alternative, accounts are secondary profiles people use in addition to a main account on a social media platform. They are a kind of automediation, a way of rep...
Fiscal Policy under Low Interest Rates
Fiscal Policy under Low Interest Rates
Rethinking fiscal and monetary policy in an economic environment of high debt and low interest rates.
Policy makers in advanced economies find themselves in an unusu...
Does Fiscal Decentralisation Matter for Poverty and Income Inequality in Pakistan?
Does Fiscal Decentralisation Matter for Poverty and Income Inequality in Pakistan?
This study endeavours to investigate the impact of fiscal decentralisation on the welfare concerns of poverty, and income inequality in Pakistan for the time period 1972 to 2013. I...
Financial stabilization in economic transformations
Financial stabilization in economic transformations
Relevance of research topic. In the context of economic transformation, financial stability is a strategic objective of fiscal policy, which contributes to accelerating economic gr...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...

