Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that impact patient quality of life (QoL) and reduce survival. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume and symptom reduction, improved health-related QoL measures, and prolonged survival compared with traditional therapies or placebo in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Panobinostat (PAN) is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) that inhibits JAK pathway signaling through increased acetylation of the JAK2 protein chaperone HSP90. In phase 1/2 studies in MF, PAN has shown reduction in splenomegaly and JAK2 V617F allele burden, and improvement of marrow fibrosis. RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in JAK2-mutation–driven MF murine models. Here, we present the results of a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of RUX and PAN in MF patients. Methods Patients with intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria and with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the costal margin were enrolled. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle along with other safety findings. DLTs were defined as protocol-specified toxicities related to treatment but unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications, occurring up to and including cycle 1 day 28, that are considered severe enough to prevent continuation of treatment. Each dosing cohort consisted of ≥ 3 evaluable patients. Data for ≥ 9 patients were required to determine the preliminary RP2D and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Following determination of the preliminary RP2D, additional patients were to be enrolled and treated at that dose in the safety-expansion phase. The range of dose levels tested for RUX was 5-15 mg twice daily (BID) and for PAN was 10-25 mg once daily, 3 times a week (TIW; days 2, 4, and 6), every other week (QOW) in a 28-day cycle. Serial blood samples collected following the first dose of RUX alone on day 1 and in combination with PAN on days 2 and 6 were evaluated for plasma concentrations of RUX (days 1, 2, and 6) and PAN (days 2 and 6) by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis. Spleen size was determined by palpation. Results A total of 38 patients have been enrolled across 6 cohorts in the dose-escalation phase. Preliminary data presented here are based on a cutoff date of March 7, 2013. Thirteen patients (34.2%) have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for discontinuation include disease progression (n = 4), adverse events (n = 7), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), and death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (34.2%), thrombocytopenia (21.2%), abdominal pain (7.9%), and diarrhea (7.9%). QTc prolongation of > 500 ms was observed in 1 patient in cohort 4. DLTs are summarized in the Table. An approximate 50% increase in plasma exposure of both RUX and PAN on day 6 from respective baselines suggested drug-drug interaction (DDI) at 15 mg RUX and 25 mg PAN. The RP2D was defined at the cohort 6 dose and schedule. Evidence of preliminary activity was observed across all cohorts with 28 patients (73.7%) showing ≥ 50% decrease in palpable spleen length at some point during the study. Conclusions The combination of RUX and PAN has a tolerable safety profile, with few DLTs and acceptable rates of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia. Also, encouraging splenomegaly reduction was seen in the dose-escalation phase. The MTD was not reached; however, due primarily to findings of anemia and potential DDI in dose cohort 6, preliminary RP2D was identified at RUX 15 mg BID/PAN 25 mg TIW/QOW and will be confirmed in the dose-expansion phase. Additional safety and efficacy data from patients in the expansion phase will be presented. Disclosures: Ribrag: Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson : Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is approved for MF but panobinostat is not approved anywhere globally at this time for any indication. Harrison:S Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heidel:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Acharyya:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Liu:Novartis: Employment. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Conneally:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Passamonti:sanofi-aventis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Title: A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose
Description:
Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that impact patient quality of life (QoL) and reduce survival.
Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume and symptom reduction, improved health-related QoL measures, and prolonged survival compared with traditional therapies or placebo in the phase 3 COMFORT studies.
Panobinostat (PAN) is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) that inhibits JAK pathway signaling through increased acetylation of the JAK2 protein chaperone HSP90.
In phase 1/2 studies in MF, PAN has shown reduction in splenomegaly and JAK2 V617F allele burden, and improvement of marrow fibrosis.
RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in JAK2-mutation–driven MF murine models.
Here, we present the results of a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of RUX and PAN in MF patients.
Methods Patients with intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria and with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the costal margin were enrolled.
Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle along with other safety findings.
DLTs were defined as protocol-specified toxicities related to treatment but unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications, occurring up to and including cycle 1 day 28, that are considered severe enough to prevent continuation of treatment.
Each dosing cohort consisted of ≥ 3 evaluable patients.
Data for ≥ 9 patients were required to determine the preliminary RP2D and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD).
Following determination of the preliminary RP2D, additional patients were to be enrolled and treated at that dose in the safety-expansion phase.
The range of dose levels tested for RUX was 5-15 mg twice daily (BID) and for PAN was 10-25 mg once daily, 3 times a week (TIW; days 2, 4, and 6), every other week (QOW) in a 28-day cycle.
Serial blood samples collected following the first dose of RUX alone on day 1 and in combination with PAN on days 2 and 6 were evaluated for plasma concentrations of RUX (days 1, 2, and 6) and PAN (days 2 and 6) by LC-MS/MS.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis.
Spleen size was determined by palpation.
Results A total of 38 patients have been enrolled across 6 cohorts in the dose-escalation phase.
Preliminary data presented here are based on a cutoff date of March 7, 2013.
Thirteen patients (34.
2%) have discontinued study treatment.
Reasons for discontinuation include disease progression (n = 4), adverse events (n = 7), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), and death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1).
The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (34.
2%), thrombocytopenia (21.
2%), abdominal pain (7.
9%), and diarrhea (7.
9%).
QTc prolongation of > 500 ms was observed in 1 patient in cohort 4.
DLTs are summarized in the Table.
An approximate 50% increase in plasma exposure of both RUX and PAN on day 6 from respective baselines suggested drug-drug interaction (DDI) at 15 mg RUX and 25 mg PAN.
The RP2D was defined at the cohort 6 dose and schedule.
Evidence of preliminary activity was observed across all cohorts with 28 patients (73.
7%) showing ≥ 50% decrease in palpable spleen length at some point during the study.
Conclusions The combination of RUX and PAN has a tolerable safety profile, with few DLTs and acceptable rates of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia.
Also, encouraging splenomegaly reduction was seen in the dose-escalation phase.
The MTD was not reached; however, due primarily to findings of anemia and potential DDI in dose cohort 6, preliminary RP2D was identified at RUX 15 mg BID/PAN 25 mg TIW/QOW and will be confirmed in the dose-expansion phase.
Additional safety and efficacy data from patients in the expansion phase will be presented.
Disclosures: Ribrag: Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson : Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is approved for MF but panobinostat is not approved anywhere globally at this time for any indication.
Harrison:S Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Heidel:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Acharyya:Novartis: Employment.
Mu:Novartis: Employment.
Liu:Novartis: Employment.
Williams:Novartis: Employment.
Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Conneally:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Passamonti:sanofi-aventis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.
Vannucchi:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Related Results

SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
A enfermagem é o pilar da assistência pois está na linha de frente do cuidado holístico, todavia esta é estigmatizada e desvalorizada, assim como não possui reconhecimento consider...
Could rituximab be a silver lining in refractory bone marrow fibrosis caused by lupus?
Could rituximab be a silver lining in refractory bone marrow fibrosis caused by lupus?
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of clinical manifestations, ranging from mild skin involvement to multisystemic ...
Effect of adjunctive scleral buckling on the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in retinal detachment repair
Effect of adjunctive scleral buckling on the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in retinal detachment repair
Background: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a sight-threatening condition requiring prompt surgical repair. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and scleral buckling (SB) are sta...
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic differences between total-body PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) and PET/MR (positron emission tomography/magnetic resona...
Immunophenotypic changes in NRBCs of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and its clinical significance
Immunophenotypic changes in NRBCs of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and its clinical significance
Abstract Purpose: Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are challenging to differentiate in the early stages. Chronic inflammation and altera...
Frequency of JAK2 and MPL Mutation in BCR/ABL Negative Myelofibrosis in KPK
Frequency of JAK2 and MPL Mutation in BCR/ABL Negative Myelofibrosis in KPK
Introduction: BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative disorders are a sub-group of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that consist of polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential thrombocythemi...
OBESITY AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
OBESITY AND MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Objective: Obesity is a known trigger for carcinogenesis and its involvement is proven in the development of solid and blood cancers. However, the involvement of obesit...

Back to Top