Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Flow Cytometry, Beads, and Microchannels
View through CrossRef
Microfluidic devices generally consume microliter to submicroliter volumes of sample and are thus well suited for use when the required reagents are scarce or expensive. Because microfluidic devices operate in a regime in which small Reynolds numbers govern the delivery of fluid samples, reagent mixing and subsequent reactivity has been a severe limiting factor in their applicability. The inclusion of packed beads in the microfluidic device repertoire has several advantages: molecular assemblies for the assay are created outside the channel on beads and characterized with flow cytometry, uniform populations of beads may be assured through rapid cytometric sorting, beads present a larger surface area for the display of receptors than flat surfaces, rapid mixing in the microcolumn is achieved because the distance that must be covered by diffusion is limited to the (≤1-μm) interstitial space between the closely packed receptorbearing beads, and analytes are captured in a flow-through format and, as such, each bead can act as a local concentrator of analytes. Progress in the combined use of beads and microfluidic devices has been limited by the ability to pack beads at specific sections of microfluidic devices. A subsequent challenge associated with the packed microcolumns of beads is the substantial pressure drop that affects the fluid flow velocity. However, some of these challenges have been overcome in the design of simple model systems that have potential applications in DNA analysis, chromatography, and immunoassays. It is the intent of this chapter to examine the recent emergence of small-volume heterogeneous immunoassays, using beads trapped in microchannels, while excluding other closely related applications such as capillary electrophoresis and flow injection–based approaches. Of necessity, the authors’ interests and availability of information pertinent to the specific discussions presented below impose additional restrictions. To date, there are only a handful of applications that combine packed beads and microfluidic devices, and even fewer that make the overt connection between flow cytometry–based assays and beads. Harrison and coworkers have provided one of the earliest conceptual demonstrations of the capability to incorporate packed beads in microfluidic devices for analytical purposes.
Title: Flow Cytometry, Beads, and Microchannels
Description:
Microfluidic devices generally consume microliter to submicroliter volumes of sample and are thus well suited for use when the required reagents are scarce or expensive.
Because microfluidic devices operate in a regime in which small Reynolds numbers govern the delivery of fluid samples, reagent mixing and subsequent reactivity has been a severe limiting factor in their applicability.
The inclusion of packed beads in the microfluidic device repertoire has several advantages: molecular assemblies for the assay are created outside the channel on beads and characterized with flow cytometry, uniform populations of beads may be assured through rapid cytometric sorting, beads present a larger surface area for the display of receptors than flat surfaces, rapid mixing in the microcolumn is achieved because the distance that must be covered by diffusion is limited to the (≤1-μm) interstitial space between the closely packed receptorbearing beads, and analytes are captured in a flow-through format and, as such, each bead can act as a local concentrator of analytes.
Progress in the combined use of beads and microfluidic devices has been limited by the ability to pack beads at specific sections of microfluidic devices.
A subsequent challenge associated with the packed microcolumns of beads is the substantial pressure drop that affects the fluid flow velocity.
However, some of these challenges have been overcome in the design of simple model systems that have potential applications in DNA analysis, chromatography, and immunoassays.
It is the intent of this chapter to examine the recent emergence of small-volume heterogeneous immunoassays, using beads trapped in microchannels, while excluding other closely related applications such as capillary electrophoresis and flow injection–based approaches.
Of necessity, the authors’ interests and availability of information pertinent to the specific discussions presented below impose additional restrictions.
To date, there are only a handful of applications that combine packed beads and microfluidic devices, and even fewer that make the overt connection between flow cytometry–based assays and beads.
Harrison and coworkers have provided one of the earliest conceptual demonstrations of the capability to incorporate packed beads in microfluidic devices for analytical purposes.
Related Results
Procedure for Latex beads coating with glycolipids v1
Procedure for Latex beads coating with glycolipids v1
Goal: This document aims to standardize the protocol for latex beads coating with the Mycobacterium leprae phenolic glycolipid “PGL I”. Beads-PGL I coating is used, for example, fo...
Glass Beads of 7th to 17th-Century CE Sub-Saharan Africa
Glass Beads of 7th to 17th-Century CE Sub-Saharan Africa
The value of glass beads to archaeologists has increased dramatically in the 21st century thanks to the development and improvements of methods to analyze the chemical composition ...
Numerical Investigation of Flow Boiling in Interconnected Microchannels at Varying Mass Fluxes
Numerical Investigation of Flow Boiling in Interconnected Microchannels at Varying Mass Fluxes
Interconnected microchannels (IMCs) in flow boiling have the advantages of optimized heat transfer performance, energy savings and high efficiency, compact size, and strong customi...
Procedures for assaying the association of bacteria or fluorescent latex beads to cells by flow cytometry v1
Procedures for assaying the association of bacteria or fluorescent latex beads to cells by flow cytometry v1
Goal: This document aims to standardize the protocol for assaying the association of bacteria or fluorescent latex beads in eukaryotic cells by flow cytometry. General considerat...
Effect of Surface Roughness on Gaseous Flow Through Microchannels
Effect of Surface Roughness on Gaseous Flow Through Microchannels
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation on nitrogen and helium flow through microchannels etched in silicon with hydraulic diameters between 10 an...
Multiphase Flow Metering:An Evaluation of Discharge Coefficients
Multiphase Flow Metering:An Evaluation of Discharge Coefficients
Abstract
The orifice discharge coefficient (CD) is the constant required to correct theoretical flow rate to actual flow rate. It is known that single phase orifi...
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Lymphomas: Current Status and Usefulness
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Lymphomas: Current Status and Usefulness
Abstract
Context.
—Immunophenotyping has become a routine practice in the diagnosis and classification of most cases of n...
Pressure Analysis of DST Flow Period Or Slug Flow For Horizontal Wells In Homogeneous Reservoir
Pressure Analysis of DST Flow Period Or Slug Flow For Horizontal Wells In Homogeneous Reservoir
Abstract
By the transient pressure for horizontal well with constant flow rate and Duhamel's principle, this paper presents the method to calculate the transient ...

