Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluating the Impact of Urine Drug Screen Frequency on Retention in Opioid Agonist Treatment in Ontario, Canada

View through CrossRef
Abstract ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate how UDS frequency impacts treatment retention in OAT. MethodsData for this retrospective cohort study of 55,921 adults with OUD in Ontario, Canada, were derived from administrative data sources between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015. All patient information was linked anonymously across databases using encrypted ten-digit health card numbers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for comparing urine drug screening frequency groups (less than monthly, monthly, bi-weekly and, weekly) using standardized differences (d) where d less than 10% indicated a statistically significant difference. A logistic regression model was then used to calculate odds ratios for the association between UDS frequency and one-year treatment retention adjusting for baseline covariates, including sex, age, location of residence, income quintile, mental disorders, HIV status and deep tissue infections. ResultsOver 70 percent of the cohort had four or more UDS per month (weekly or more UDS). Significant associations were observed between UDS frequency and one-year treatment retention in OAT bi-weekly (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 3.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.75-3.75); weekly UDS (aOR = 6.86, 95% CI, 5.88-8.00) and; more than weekly (aOR = 8.03, 95% CI, 6.87-9.38) using the monthly or less groups as the reference.ConclusionThis study identified a significant association between weekly UDS and one-year treatment retention in OAT. Therefore, these findings put into question the recent changes in OAT guidelines recommending UDS only be conducted monthly. More research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for UDS frequency in OAT.
Title: Evaluating the Impact of Urine Drug Screen Frequency on Retention in Opioid Agonist Treatment in Ontario, Canada
Description:
Abstract ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate how UDS frequency impacts treatment retention in OAT.
MethodsData for this retrospective cohort study of 55,921 adults with OUD in Ontario, Canada, were derived from administrative data sources between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015.
All patient information was linked anonymously across databases using encrypted ten-digit health card numbers.
Descriptive statistics were calculated for comparing urine drug screening frequency groups (less than monthly, monthly, bi-weekly and, weekly) using standardized differences (d) where d less than 10% indicated a statistically significant difference.
A logistic regression model was then used to calculate odds ratios for the association between UDS frequency and one-year treatment retention adjusting for baseline covariates, including sex, age, location of residence, income quintile, mental disorders, HIV status and deep tissue infections.
ResultsOver 70 percent of the cohort had four or more UDS per month (weekly or more UDS).
Significant associations were observed between UDS frequency and one-year treatment retention in OAT bi-weekly (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 3.
20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.
75-3.
75); weekly UDS (aOR = 6.
86, 95% CI, 5.
88-8.
00) and; more than weekly (aOR = 8.
03, 95% CI, 6.
87-9.
38) using the monthly or less groups as the reference.
ConclusionThis study identified a significant association between weekly UDS and one-year treatment retention in OAT.
Therefore, these findings put into question the recent changes in OAT guidelines recommending UDS only be conducted monthly.
More research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for UDS frequency in OAT.

Related Results

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Converting Adults with Sickle Cell Disease from Full Agonist Opioids to Buprenorphine
Abstract Background: The management of pain in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) is complex, with the intermingling of both acute vaso-occlusive events and chron...
Exploring the impact of the opioid epidemic in Black and Hispanic communities in the United States
Exploring the impact of the opioid epidemic in Black and Hispanic communities in the United States
Context: In recent years, due to an alarming increase in the number of opioid-related overdose fatalities for White, Non-Hispanics in rural and suburban communities across the Unit...
Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Cesarean Delivery
Implementation of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Cesarean Delivery
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a multiphase, departmental quality improvement effort decreases opioid prescribing and increases multimodal analgesic use after cesarean de...
PO-258 Women's Freestyle Wrestling Athletes Prepare for Urine Ten Evaluation Before the National Games
PO-258 Women's Freestyle Wrestling Athletes Prepare for Urine Ten Evaluation Before the National Games
Objective Urine routines inspection was used as a kind of non invasive test method, which was used widely in the biochemical monitoring of athletes.The urine routine was monitored ...
Severity of opioid dependence and its relation with psychosocial factors of users.
Severity of opioid dependence and its relation with psychosocial factors of users.
Objectives: To determine the relationship between severe opioid dependence and psychosocial factors of users Study Design: Descriptive Cross Sectional study. Setting: Department of...
Abstract 4360: Opioid, non-opioid, and non-pharmacological pain management in patients with a history of cancer
Abstract 4360: Opioid, non-opioid, and non-pharmacological pain management in patients with a history of cancer
Abstract Background Pain is highly prevalent among individuals with cancer. Consequently, adequate and equitable pain management are hallmarks of quality cancer care...

Back to Top