Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

When Are National Courts Obliged to Refer Questions?

View through CrossRef
AbstractChapter 6 defines when a national court must make a preliminary reference. In principle, a national court whose decision cannot be appealed against (a court of last instance) is obligated to make a reference for a preliminary ruling if the main proceedings give rise to a question about the interpretation or validity of EU law. The chapter analyses when a national court is regarded as being a court of last instance and it analyses when a court of last instance is exempt from the obligation to make a reference. Particular focus is upon the acte éclairé and acte clair doctrines. Chapter 6 also examines when national courts, other than those of last instance, have a duty to make a reference. The chapter also considers the legal consequences of a national court failing to comply with its obligation to make a reference; in this respect it considers the question of how a failure to make a preliminary reference may affect the validity of a national judgment, the duty to reopen the case file, the obligation to pay damages, the possibility that the Commission will initiate infringement proceedings, and the possibility that such failure will constitute an infringement of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Title: When Are National Courts Obliged to Refer Questions?
Description:
AbstractChapter 6 defines when a national court must make a preliminary reference.
In principle, a national court whose decision cannot be appealed against (a court of last instance) is obligated to make a reference for a preliminary ruling if the main proceedings give rise to a question about the interpretation or validity of EU law.
The chapter analyses when a national court is regarded as being a court of last instance and it analyses when a court of last instance is exempt from the obligation to make a reference.
Particular focus is upon the acte éclairé and acte clair doctrines.
Chapter 6 also examines when national courts, other than those of last instance, have a duty to make a reference.
The chapter also considers the legal consequences of a national court failing to comply with its obligation to make a reference; in this respect it considers the question of how a failure to make a preliminary reference may affect the validity of a national judgment, the duty to reopen the case file, the obligation to pay damages, the possibility that the Commission will initiate infringement proceedings, and the possibility that such failure will constitute an infringement of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Features of the jurisdiction of economic courts
Features of the jurisdiction of economic courts
The article considers the problem of determining the jurisdiction of commercial courts. It is proved that jurisdiction should be considered depending on the theoretical model of sp...
Oleynikov v. Russia
Oleynikov v. Russia
Human rights — State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Civil proceedings against foreign State for repayment of debt arising under loan agreement — Organ of State — Embassy of f...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Implementation of the Mobile Court Policy in Religious Courts On The Legal Political Perspective
Implementation of the Mobile Court Policy in Religious Courts On The Legal Political Perspective
The mobile court policy is a way in which the court can provide the best and equal service to justice seekers by the principles of simplicity, speed and low costs. This research di...
Affirmative Power to Strip State Courts of Jurisdiction
Affirmative Power to Strip State Courts of Jurisdiction
The very substantial literature on the scope of congressional power to strip courts of jurisdiction contains a gap: it does not discuss the source of the affirmative power of Congr...
Understanding the German Mixed Tribunal
Understanding the German Mixed Tribunal
Abstract: Germany employs mixed tribunals in a number of its courts, including the criminal, administrative and labour courts. They are markedly different from court...

Back to Top