Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ potentiates pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and adrenal and somatotropic changes of weaned pigs after Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide challenge

Our previous study demonstrated mRNA and protein expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g (PPAR-g) in the immune system of weaned pigs. In this report, to test the hypothesis that activation of PPAR-g in immune system modulates inflammatory response, and adrenal and somatotropic responses associated with immune challenge, we administered intraperitoneally PPAR-g agonist and/or antagonist in weaned pigs subjected to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. Unexpectedly, we found that a single injection of the PPAR-g agonist rosiglitazone (given at 3 mg/kg body weight 30 min before LPS injection) failed to block pro-inflammatory cytokine production induced by LPS injection. Rather, plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), mRNA abundance of TNF-a in thymus, spleen, mesenteric lymph node and peripheral white blood cells, mRNA abundance of IL-6 in thymus, protein levels of TNF-a in spleen and mesenteric lymph node, and protein levels of IL-6 in spleen and mesenteric lymph node, were elevated beyond the levels in control pigs injected with LPS. Furthermore, rosiglitazone potentiated the increase of plasma cortisol and prostaglandin E 2 concentrations, and the decrease of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 concentration induced by LPS injection. Co-administration of the PPAR-g antagonist bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (given 30 mg/kg body weight) 30 min prior to treatment with rosiglitazone antagonized the effect of the PPAR-g agonist, indicating a PPAR-g-dependent effect. Our data indicate that ligand-induced activation of PPAR-g does not ameliorate but enhances pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and further potentiates the adrenal and somatotropic changes in weaned pigs subjected to E. coli LPS challenge, which suggests that PPAR-g activation may not be useful, but potentially harmful, in the treatment of immune challenge in livestock. Our results raise doubts about the prevalently accepted anti-inflammatory role for PPAR-g activation.