Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A universal diagnosis syntax

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Diagnoses are crucial assets of clinical work and provide the foundation for treatment and follow up. They should be informative and customized to the patient’s problem. Common prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes may aid the implementation of expressions that generate diagnoses. Results Apt choices of symbols plays a major role in science. In this study, the variables e, o, and p are assigned to names of an etiological agent, a disorder, and a pathogenetic mechanism, respectively. The suffix -itis designates infections, allergies, inflammation, and/or immune reactions. Diagnoses (d) are generated by the formula d:= e&o&p where ‘&’ means concatenation and ‘:= ’ means assignment. Thus, with e:= ’Staphylococcus aureus ‘, o:= ’endocard’, and p:= ’itis’, d:= e&o&p generates the diagnosis d = ’Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis’. Diagnoses formed this way comply with common clinical diagnoses. Certain extensions generate complete, systematic medical diagnoses that are applicable to all medical specialties. For example, common medical prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes give rise to o = ’hypothyroidism’, o = ’tachycardia’, and o = ’hypophagocytosis’. The formula scales well with the developments in clinical medicine, systems biology, molecular biology, and microbiology. The diagnosis generating formula d:= e&o&p requires meticulous analysis of the components of diagnoses plus the introduction of appropriate variables and terms. Terms partition on established clinical categories and adhere to established clinical nomenclature. The syntax generates universal medical diagnoses. Conclusions The present study concerns a universal diagnosis syntax (UDS) that generates diagnoses using the formula d:= e&o&p with several extensions described in the study. The formula is easy to learn and covers diagnoses in all medical specialties. The present work succeeded in creating diagnoses from the formula. The fundamental insight is that no matter how complicated a diagnosis is it can be generated by a systematic process, which adds terms one by one. UDS may have implications for medical education and classifications. The formula lays a foundation for structured clinical decision-making. Formulas are hallmarks of hard science. So, d:= e&o&p anticipates a scientific medical revolution.
Title: A universal diagnosis syntax
Description:
Abstract Background Diagnoses are crucial assets of clinical work and provide the foundation for treatment and follow up.
They should be informative and customized to the patient’s problem.
Common prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes may aid the implementation of expressions that generate diagnoses.
Results Apt choices of symbols plays a major role in science.
In this study, the variables e, o, and p are assigned to names of an etiological agent, a disorder, and a pathogenetic mechanism, respectively.
The suffix -itis designates infections, allergies, inflammation, and/or immune reactions.
Diagnoses (d) are generated by the formula d:= e&o&p where ‘&’ means concatenation and ‘:= ’ means assignment.
Thus, with e:= ’Staphylococcus aureus ‘, o:= ’endocard’, and p:= ’itis’, d:= e&o&p generates the diagnosis d = ’Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis’.
Diagnoses formed this way comply with common clinical diagnoses.
Certain extensions generate complete, systematic medical diagnoses that are applicable to all medical specialties.
For example, common medical prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes give rise to o = ’hypothyroidism’, o = ’tachycardia’, and o = ’hypophagocytosis’.
The formula scales well with the developments in clinical medicine, systems biology, molecular biology, and microbiology.
The diagnosis generating formula d:= e&o&p requires meticulous analysis of the components of diagnoses plus the introduction of appropriate variables and terms.
Terms partition on established clinical categories and adhere to established clinical nomenclature.
The syntax generates universal medical diagnoses.
Conclusions The present study concerns a universal diagnosis syntax (UDS) that generates diagnoses using the formula d:= e&o&p with several extensions described in the study.
The formula is easy to learn and covers diagnoses in all medical specialties.
The present work succeeded in creating diagnoses from the formula.
The fundamental insight is that no matter how complicated a diagnosis is it can be generated by a systematic process, which adds terms one by one.
UDS may have implications for medical education and classifications.
The formula lays a foundation for structured clinical decision-making.
Formulas are hallmarks of hard science.
So, d:= e&o&p anticipates a scientific medical revolution.

Related Results

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
The utility of SYNTAX score predictability by electrocardiogram parameters in patients with unstable angina
The utility of SYNTAX score predictability by electrocardiogram parameters in patients with unstable angina
Abstract Background SYNTAX score is one of the risk assessment systems to predict cardiac events in acute coronary syndrome patients. Despite the la...
The Ultimate Conditional Syntax
The Ultimate Conditional Syntax
Functional programming languages typically support expressive pattern-matching syntax allowing programmers to write concise and type-safe code, especially appropriate for manipul...
JOHANN SAMUEL FRIEDRICH BOUBRIGI SÜNTAKSILOENGUD TARTU ÜLIKOOLIS; pp. 62–121
JOHANN SAMUEL FRIEDRICH BOUBRIGI SÜNTAKSILOENGUD TARTU ÜLIKOOLIS; pp. 62–121
Johann Samuel Friedrich Boubrig’s lectures on syntax at the University of Tartu The article gives a detailed overview of the lectures on Estonian syntax delivered by Johann Samu...
Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax
Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax
Interdisciplinary perspectives on the evolutionary and biological roots of syntax, describing current research on syntax in fields ranging from linguistics to neurology. ...

Back to Top