Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A universal diagnosis syntax
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Diagnoses are crucial assets of clinical work and provide the foundation for treatment and follow up. They should be informative and customized to the patient’s problem. Common prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes may aid the implementation of expressions that generate diagnoses.
Results
Apt choices of symbols plays a major role in science. In this study, the variables e, o, and p are assigned to names of an etiological agent, a disorder, and a pathogenetic mechanism, respectively. The suffix -itis designates infections, allergies, inflammation, and/or immune reactions. Diagnoses (d) are generated by the formula d:= e&o&p where ‘&’ means concatenation and ‘:= ’ means assignment. Thus, with e:= ’Staphylococcus aureus ‘, o:= ’endocard’, and p:= ’itis’, d:= e&o&p generates the diagnosis d = ’Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis’. Diagnoses formed this way comply with common clinical diagnoses. Certain extensions generate complete, systematic medical diagnoses that are applicable to all medical specialties. For example, common medical prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes give rise to o = ’hypothyroidism’, o = ’tachycardia’, and o = ’hypophagocytosis’. The formula scales well with the developments in clinical medicine, systems biology, molecular biology, and microbiology. The diagnosis generating formula d:= e&o&p requires meticulous analysis of the components of diagnoses plus the introduction of appropriate variables and terms. Terms partition on established clinical categories and adhere to established clinical nomenclature. The syntax generates universal medical diagnoses.
Conclusions
The present study concerns a universal diagnosis syntax (UDS) that generates diagnoses using the formula d:= e&o&p with several extensions described in the study. The formula is easy to learn and covers diagnoses in all medical specialties. The present work succeeded in creating diagnoses from the formula. The fundamental insight is that no matter how complicated a diagnosis is it can be generated by a systematic process, which adds terms one by one. UDS may have implications for medical education and classifications. The formula lays a foundation for structured clinical decision-making. Formulas are hallmarks of hard science. So, d:= e&o&p anticipates a scientific medical revolution.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: A universal diagnosis syntax
Description:
Abstract
Background
Diagnoses are crucial assets of clinical work and provide the foundation for treatment and follow up.
They should be informative and customized to the patient’s problem.
Common prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes may aid the implementation of expressions that generate diagnoses.
Results
Apt choices of symbols plays a major role in science.
In this study, the variables e, o, and p are assigned to names of an etiological agent, a disorder, and a pathogenetic mechanism, respectively.
The suffix -itis designates infections, allergies, inflammation, and/or immune reactions.
Diagnoses (d) are generated by the formula d:= e&o&p where ‘&’ means concatenation and ‘:= ’ means assignment.
Thus, with e:= ’Staphylococcus aureus ‘, o:= ’endocard’, and p:= ’itis’, d:= e&o&p generates the diagnosis d = ’Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis’.
Diagnoses formed this way comply with common clinical diagnoses.
Certain extensions generate complete, systematic medical diagnoses that are applicable to all medical specialties.
For example, common medical prefixes, morphemes, and suffixes give rise to o = ’hypothyroidism’, o = ’tachycardia’, and o = ’hypophagocytosis’.
The formula scales well with the developments in clinical medicine, systems biology, molecular biology, and microbiology.
The diagnosis generating formula d:= e&o&p requires meticulous analysis of the components of diagnoses plus the introduction of appropriate variables and terms.
Terms partition on established clinical categories and adhere to established clinical nomenclature.
The syntax generates universal medical diagnoses.
Conclusions
The present study concerns a universal diagnosis syntax (UDS) that generates diagnoses using the formula d:= e&o&p with several extensions described in the study.
The formula is easy to learn and covers diagnoses in all medical specialties.
The present work succeeded in creating diagnoses from the formula.
The fundamental insight is that no matter how complicated a diagnosis is it can be generated by a systematic process, which adds terms one by one.
UDS may have implications for medical education and classifications.
The formula lays a foundation for structured clinical decision-making.
Formulas are hallmarks of hard science.
So, d:= e&o&p anticipates a scientific medical revolution.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
The utility of SYNTAX score predictability by electrocardiogram parameters in patients with unstable angina
The utility of SYNTAX score predictability by electrocardiogram parameters in patients with unstable angina
Abstract
Background
SYNTAX score is one of the risk assessment systems to predict cardiac events in acute coronary syndrome patients. Despite the la...
The Ultimate Conditional Syntax
The Ultimate Conditional Syntax
Functional programming languages typically support expressive pattern-matching syntax allowing programmers
to write concise and type-safe code, especially appropriate for manipul...
P4637Elevated von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII are associated with higher clinical SYNTAX score in patients with stable coronary artery disease
P4637Elevated von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII are associated with higher clinical SYNTAX score in patients with stable coronary artery disease
Abstract
Background
Von Willebrand factor (VWF plays) central role in thrombogenesis, and circulates in a noncovalent complex wi...
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship between the HEART Score and the Severity of CAD using the SYNTAX Score in Patients with NSTEMI Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Study from Turkey
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship between the HEART Score and the Severity of CAD using the SYNTAX Score in Patients with NSTEMI Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Study from Turkey
Background:
The HEART score is a risk stratification tool for acute chest pain, evaluating history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin. The SYNTAX (synergy between pe...
JOHANN SAMUEL FRIEDRICH BOUBRIGI SÜNTAKSILOENGUD TARTU ÜLIKOOLIS; pp. 62–121
JOHANN SAMUEL FRIEDRICH BOUBRIGI SÜNTAKSILOENGUD TARTU ÜLIKOOLIS; pp. 62–121
Johann Samuel Friedrich Boubrigâs lectures on syntax at the University of Tartu The article gives a detailed overview of the lectures on Estonian syntax delivered by Johann Samu...
Association of Triglyceride/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio and Coronary Lesion Severity in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan
Association of Triglyceride/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio and Coronary Lesion Severity in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan
Introduction: Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of worldwide death. A number of markers have been identified in terms of the atherogenic potential of the lipid profile.Th...
Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax
Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax
Interdisciplinary perspectives on the evolutionary and biological roots of syntax, describing current research on syntax in fields ranging from linguistics to neurology.
...

