Clinical Comparative Study on the Treatment of Inferior Pole Fractures of Patella by Double-row Anchor Suture Bridge Technique Combined with Kirschner Wire Tension Band Internal Fixation

Abstract Objective: To investigate the method, technique and clinical efficacy of double-row anchor suture bridge technique in the treatment of inferior pole fractures of patella, and to compare it with traditional Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation. Methods: General information A total of 62 patients were enrolled in this study, including 35 males and 27 females, aged 31-80 years old, with an average of (53.2±4) years old. All the patients were divided into two groups by a random double-blind method: Group A (double-row anchor suture bridge technique group) and Group B (Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation group), with 32 cases and 30 cases in each group, respectively. The two techniques were performed by the same group of doctors to fix the fracture respectively, and the intraoperative bleeding, operation time, incidence of postoperative complications, knee function score, etc., were compared between the two techniques. Results: Group A (double-row anchor suture bridge technique group): operation time 56-80min, with an average of (60±10) min; intraoperative blood loss 30-56ml, with an average of (43±10) ml. All incisions healed in one stage and stitches were removed after 2 weeks. No complications such as incision infection, flap necrosis and nerve injury occurred. The average healing time of the fracture was 12 weeks. At the last follow-up, the Bostman score was (28.5±3.3), and the excellent rate was 93.7%. Group B (Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation group): operation time 54-76min, with an average of (56±10) min; intraoperative blood loss 31-50ml, with an average of (43±80) ml. One patient developed delayed incision healing postoperatively. Four patients experienced Kirschner wire withdrawal, one of which was accompanied by infection. Two patients were found to have mild separation of distal fracture fragments, despite the fracture being fine. The average healing time of the fracture was 13 weeks. At the last follow-up, the Bostman score was (23.5±3.3), and the excellent rate was 86.7%. Conclusion: Double-row anchor suture bridge technique is applied to inferior pole fractures of patella by virtue of its various effects, such as the complete preservation of the inferior pole fragments during the operation, satisfactory fracture reduction, firm fixation, and meeting patients’ requirements for early postoperative ambulation. This technology is superior to traditional Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation owing to its advantages of no need to take out the internal fixation, firm fixation, no need to worry about Kirschner wire withdrawal and fewer complications, and its clinical efficacy satisfaction rate is also better than traditional surgical methods. In short, double-row anchor suture bridge technique is an ideal surgical procedure for the treatment of the inferior pole fracture of patella with safety, reliability and high satisfaction.