Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Processual Archaeology
View through CrossRef
Processual archaeology (also known as new or scientific archaeology) is a theoretical movement rooted in the 1960s–1970s (although some argue both for an earlier start and for its continued dominance). Processual archaeology represented a radical break from the then-dominant culture, the historical and antiquarian approaches to archaeology. Although the goals and methods of processual archaeology would evolve over time, its central tenets included the following: (1) Archaeology as a science: Archaeology was traditionally seen as a branch of history, focused on explication of the past, gathering data to set chronologies and to collect site-specific assemblages. The new archaeologists argued that archaeology should focus on explanation (as defined by logical positivism; see Philosophical Groundwork) as opposed to explication. Scientific explanations would demand that archaeologists focus on dynamic systems—an approach called “systems theory”—with the goal of understanding the complex factors driving cultural change, and explaining how people adapted to the environmental factors that drove cultural changes. (2) Focus on culture process: Arguing that culture–historical archaeology results in static snapshots of phases of occupation (an artifact of archaeological collection and not a representation of reality), the processualists focused on generating a more lifelike, fluid understanding of the past, one based on understanding the complex interrelated cultural and environmental factors that contribute to cultural (and archaeological) change over time. (3) An expressly theoretical approach: The theoretical goals of processual archaeology resulted in a number of methodological changes in the ways in which archaeology was (and is) practiced, resulting in a strong focus on survey, on the integration of a wide range of new types of data, and on the replacement of the solo archaeologist with an archaeological team of experts, representing a number of fields that contribute to the explanation of the past.
Title: Processual Archaeology
Description:
Processual archaeology (also known as new or scientific archaeology) is a theoretical movement rooted in the 1960s–1970s (although some argue both for an earlier start and for its continued dominance).
Processual archaeology represented a radical break from the then-dominant culture, the historical and antiquarian approaches to archaeology.
Although the goals and methods of processual archaeology would evolve over time, its central tenets included the following: (1) Archaeology as a science: Archaeology was traditionally seen as a branch of history, focused on explication of the past, gathering data to set chronologies and to collect site-specific assemblages.
The new archaeologists argued that archaeology should focus on explanation (as defined by logical positivism; see Philosophical Groundwork) as opposed to explication.
Scientific explanations would demand that archaeologists focus on dynamic systems—an approach called “systems theory”—with the goal of understanding the complex factors driving cultural change, and explaining how people adapted to the environmental factors that drove cultural changes.
(2) Focus on culture process: Arguing that culture–historical archaeology results in static snapshots of phases of occupation (an artifact of archaeological collection and not a representation of reality), the processualists focused on generating a more lifelike, fluid understanding of the past, one based on understanding the complex interrelated cultural and environmental factors that contribute to cultural (and archaeological) change over time.
(3) An expressly theoretical approach: The theoretical goals of processual archaeology resulted in a number of methodological changes in the ways in which archaeology was (and is) practiced, resulting in a strong focus on survey, on the integration of a wide range of new types of data, and on the replacement of the solo archaeologist with an archaeological team of experts, representing a number of fields that contribute to the explanation of the past.
Related Results
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
The main recommendations of the panel report can be summarised under five key headings: HUMANITY The Panel recommends recognition that research in this field should be geared tow...
Landscape Archaeology
Landscape Archaeology
Landscape archaeology is the study of how people interacted with their surroundings, as evidenced by the archaeological record. This may appear to be an all-encompassing remit, but...
Contribuição Crítica Para Uma Nova Estrutura Teórica Da Capacidade Processual
Contribuição Crítica Para Uma Nova Estrutura Teórica Da Capacidade Processual
O artigo apresenta uma crítica às concepções doutrinárias sobre a capacidade processual, especialmente no que tange à inclusão da capacidade de ser parte na sua estruturação teóric...
DIREITO PROCESSUAL ROMANO
DIREITO PROCESSUAL ROMANO
O Código de Processo Civil de 2015 e o contemporâneo debate sobre o Poder Judiciário refletem a preocupação da sociedade para com a sua Justiça. Hoje, no meio jurídico, buscam-se s...
Princípio da autonomia privada, negócios processuais e os poderes do juiz Luiz Carlos de Assis Junior
Princípio da autonomia privada, negócios processuais e os poderes do juiz Luiz Carlos de Assis Junior
O princípio da autonomia privada é a norma que confere à pessoa o direito de autodeterminação nos limites legais e constitucionais. Este princípio, outrora limitado à esfera das re...
A centralidade do juízo oral no Sistema Acusatório: uma visão estratégica acerca do caso penal
A centralidade do juízo oral no Sistema Acusatório: uma visão estratégica acerca do caso penal
O presente artigo visa a debater a questão da oralidade como centro metodológico do sistema acusatório, indicando um formato de administração da justiça pautado no litígio. Para is...
CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL: O DIÁLOGOS DOS DIÁLOGOS
CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CONSTITUCIONAL: O DIÁLOGOS DOS DIÁLOGOS
O Congresso Internacional de Direito Constitucional Processual organizado pelo Instituto Paranaense do Direito Processual concedeu-me valiosa oportunidade para compartilhar ideias ...
Da necessidade de proteção processual especial ao direito ambiental
Da necessidade de proteção processual especial ao direito ambiental
O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a necessidade de e uma proteção processual especial no direito ambiental, tendo em vista a relevância dos bens jurídicos a serem protegidos. Pri...

