Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project
View through CrossRef
Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management. Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists reported a lack of communication and standardised practice across the wards. Resulting delays in obtaining blood test results can impact detrimentally on patient safety and management.
We designed a survey which highlighted inefficient handovers and discrepancies between wards as driving factors behind this. We therefore aimed to improve communication between phlebotomists and doctors, as well as the overall organisation of the service. This took the form of the “Phlebotomy Box,” a box file system offering a set location for blood stickers to be situated. The box concept was optimised on a series of medical and surgical wards, incorporating multidisciplinary feedback from relevant teams. We measured how many untaken bloods were handed over to medical staff continuously, both pre- and post implementation of the phlebotomy box.
Our baseline ward demonstrated poor handover rates of untaken bloods, ranging from 0% to 40%. This increased to a consistent 100% following introduction of the Phlebotomy Box and ongoing staff education. Once optimised, the box was trialled on a further two medical wards and one surgical ward, achieving 100% handover from an initial 0% to 67%. Quantitative improvement was also reflected qualitatively in widespread staff surveys, with overwhelmingly positive support and acceptance.
In summary, the Phlebotomy Box innovation has led to 100% of untaken bloods being effectively handed over. We have demonstrated a significant improvement in communication and efficiency within the phlebotomy service, with tangible benefits to patient care, as minimising time lags can prevent delays in clinical decisions. The phlebotomy box represents a simplistic, sustainable intervention that could be easily replicated in other Trusts.
Title: Improving communication between phlebotomists and doctors: a quality improvement project
Description:
Blood tests are a seemingly basic investigation, but are often a vital part of directing patient management.
Despite the importance of this everyday process, we indentified the potential for improvement of the current phlebotomy service in our hospital, as both junior doctors and phlebotomists reported a lack of communication and standardised practice across the wards.
Resulting delays in obtaining blood test results can impact detrimentally on patient safety and management.
We designed a survey which highlighted inefficient handovers and discrepancies between wards as driving factors behind this.
We therefore aimed to improve communication between phlebotomists and doctors, as well as the overall organisation of the service.
This took the form of the “Phlebotomy Box,” a box file system offering a set location for blood stickers to be situated.
The box concept was optimised on a series of medical and surgical wards, incorporating multidisciplinary feedback from relevant teams.
We measured how many untaken bloods were handed over to medical staff continuously, both pre- and post implementation of the phlebotomy box.
Our baseline ward demonstrated poor handover rates of untaken bloods, ranging from 0% to 40%.
This increased to a consistent 100% following introduction of the Phlebotomy Box and ongoing staff education.
Once optimised, the box was trialled on a further two medical wards and one surgical ward, achieving 100% handover from an initial 0% to 67%.
Quantitative improvement was also reflected qualitatively in widespread staff surveys, with overwhelmingly positive support and acceptance.
In summary, the Phlebotomy Box innovation has led to 100% of untaken bloods being effectively handed over.
We have demonstrated a significant improvement in communication and efficiency within the phlebotomy service, with tangible benefits to patient care, as minimising time lags can prevent delays in clinical decisions.
The phlebotomy box represents a simplistic, sustainable intervention that could be easily replicated in other Trusts.
Related Results
Improving phlebotomy handover to doctors: a quality improvement project
Improving phlebotomy handover to doctors: a quality improvement project
Abstract
AIM: To design a hospital-standardised phlebotomy handover method to improve the communication between phlebotomists and doctors. To reduce delays in patien...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Study on the Health Communication Behavior of Chinese Doctors on Network Media——Based on the Empirical Investigation of 119 Chinese Doctors
Study on the Health Communication Behavior of Chinese Doctors on Network Media——Based on the Empirical Investigation of 119 Chinese Doctors
AbstractIntroductionIn order to reduce the perceived risk of medical decision-making, Chinese patients tend to spend time and energy to understand relevant medical knowledge. After...
Doctors’ Pride and Ethics: Time to Introspect
Doctors’ Pride and Ethics: Time to Introspect
A doctor’s role in society is unique. Over years, medical science has advanced; publics’ expectations have changed; recentpandemic challenged it. Doctors’ face is blemished by accu...
Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice
Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice
ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess burnout in a sample of general practitioners (GPs), to determine factors associated with depersonalisation and to investigate ...
The current situation of doctor communication with patients and related factors in outpatient department, Gia Dinh People hospital, 2021
The current situation of doctor communication with patients and related factors in outpatient department, Gia Dinh People hospital, 2021
Objective: We measured behavior and some factors affecting doctor–patient communication at Gia Dinh People Hospital in 2021. Methods: A cross sectional design used and combine quan...
Assessment of Quality of Life of Doctors during Corona Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka City
Assessment of Quality of Life of Doctors during Corona Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka City
Background: Corona pandemic is an event where there is a rupture of the normal life pattern. The healthcare professionals specially doctors had faced an unknown potential threat to...
Psychiatry and you
Psychiatry and you
Improving your emotional resilience is a key task for you as a medical student. As a future doctor, your health and well- being are vital to that of your patients: if you are not f...

