Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Determinants of IGF‐I status in a large cohort of growth hormone‐deficient (GHD) subjects: the role of timing of onset of GHD

View through CrossRef
Summarybackground  IGF‐I standard deviation score (SDS) is widely used in clinical practice; however, factors determining IGF‐I SDS in GH‐deficient (GHD) individuals remain incompletely understood. Earlier studies have been limited by the small size of cohorts studied. We have used the KIMS database to examine if a true difference exists between subjects who developed GHD in adult life (AO), and those who developed GHD in childhood (CO).patients  A total of 1317 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 1073 with AO GHD and 244 with CO GHD.methods  Serum IGF‐I concentrations were determined by a hydrochloric acid–ethanol extraction radioimmunoassay method using synthetic IGF‐I for labelling. The reference range was calculated using normative data from healthy Swedish individuals.results  A total of 86% of patients with CO GHD but only 52% of patients with AO GHD had IGF‐I SDS below −2 SDS. The CO cohort had a lower IGF‐I SDS (−4·69 vs.−2·24, P < 0·0001), a smaller body mass index (BMI; 26·6 vs. 28·6 kg/m2, P < 0·0001) and waist–hip ratio (WHR; 0·90 vs. 0·92 P < 0·001) than the AO cohort. A stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to examine the principal determinants of IGF‐I SDS. Age at onset of GHD was the most important determinant of IGF‐I SDS, contributing 17% towards the variability of IGF‐I SDS. Timing of onset, gender, BMI, and number of pituitary hormone deficiencies other than GH deficiency were also significant determinants of IGF‐I SDS.conclusion  Whilst age at onset of GHD was the most important determinant of IGF‐I SDS, individuals with CO GHD had values on average 1·43 lower than those with AO GHD, all other factors being equal. Potential explanations include differences in GH secretory patterns, variation in body composition, and/or suboptimal treatment of GHD in childhood.
Title: Determinants of IGF‐I status in a large cohort of growth hormone‐deficient (GHD) subjects: the role of timing of onset of GHD
Description:
Summarybackground  IGF‐I standard deviation score (SDS) is widely used in clinical practice; however, factors determining IGF‐I SDS in GH‐deficient (GHD) individuals remain incompletely understood.
Earlier studies have been limited by the small size of cohorts studied.
We have used the KIMS database to examine if a true difference exists between subjects who developed GHD in adult life (AO), and those who developed GHD in childhood (CO).
patients  A total of 1317 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 1073 with AO GHD and 244 with CO GHD.
methods  Serum IGF‐I concentrations were determined by a hydrochloric acid–ethanol extraction radioimmunoassay method using synthetic IGF‐I for labelling.
The reference range was calculated using normative data from healthy Swedish individuals.
results  A total of 86% of patients with CO GHD but only 52% of patients with AO GHD had IGF‐I SDS below −2 SDS.
The CO cohort had a lower IGF‐I SDS (−4·69 vs.
−2·24, P < 0·0001), a smaller body mass index (BMI; 26·6 vs.
28·6 kg/m2, P < 0·0001) and waist–hip ratio (WHR; 0·90 vs.
0·92 P < 0·001) than the AO cohort.
A stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to examine the principal determinants of IGF‐I SDS.
Age at onset of GHD was the most important determinant of IGF‐I SDS, contributing 17% towards the variability of IGF‐I SDS.
Timing of onset, gender, BMI, and number of pituitary hormone deficiencies other than GH deficiency were also significant determinants of IGF‐I SDS.
conclusion  Whilst age at onset of GHD was the most important determinant of IGF‐I SDS, individuals with CO GHD had values on average 1·43 lower than those with AO GHD, all other factors being equal.
Potential explanations include differences in GH secretory patterns, variation in body composition, and/or suboptimal treatment of GHD in childhood.

Related Results

The impact of idiopathic childhood‐onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD) on bone mass in subjects without adult GHD
The impact of idiopathic childhood‐onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD) on bone mass in subjects without adult GHD
Summaryobjective  Despite seemingly adequate growth hormone (GH) treatment during childhood, children with GH deficiency (GHD) have reduced bone mineral density (BMD) at final heig...
The mechanism of maturation of insulin-like growth factor-1
The mechanism of maturation of insulin-like growth factor-1
This study, to elucidate the role of des(1-3)IGF-I in the maturation of IGF-I,used two strategies. The first was to detect the presence of enzymes in tissues, which would act on IG...
Abstract 10: Neuroendocrine Dysfunction and Functional Disability Following Stroke
Abstract 10: Neuroendocrine Dysfunction and Functional Disability Following Stroke
Comprehensive studies of the incidence of neuroendocrine dysfunction following stroke are lacking. The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of neuroendocrine dy...
The basic route of nuclear‐targeted transport of IGF‐1/IGF‐1R and potential biological functions in intestinal epithelial cells
The basic route of nuclear‐targeted transport of IGF‐1/IGF‐1R and potential biological functions in intestinal epithelial cells
AbstractObjectivesInsulin‐like growth factor (IGF‐1) plays an important role in many biological processes in the intestinal tract. However, the cellular behaviour and characteristi...
7780 Silver - Russell Syndrome and Free Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Measurements
7780 Silver - Russell Syndrome and Free Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Measurements
Abstract Disclosure: R.D. Oude Engberink: None. V. van den Bogert: None. L. IJsselstijn: None. S.A. van den Berg: None. D.C. van der Kaay: None. Intro...
9282 Silver - Russell Syndrome and Free Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Measurements
9282 Silver - Russell Syndrome and Free Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Measurements
Abstract Disclosure: R.D. Oude Engberink: None. V. van den Bogert: None. L. IJsselstijn: None. S.A. van den Berg: None. D.C. van der Kaay: None. Intro...

Back to Top