Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

e0692 Assessment of left ventricular twisting and untwisting in patients with myocardial infarction and ischaemia

View through CrossRef
Objective To assess LV twisting and untwisting in patients with myocardial ischaemia at rest and myocardial infarction (MI) with different sites, searching for the value and characteristics of left ventricular twisting and untwisting in patients with CAD by speckle tracking imaging (STI). Methods Echocardiography were performanced in 60 patients with MI (consisting of anteroseptal MI, infer-posterior MI and extensive infarction of the anterior wall), 31 patients with myocardial ischaemia and 26 control individuals who were all received coronary arteriography. It was demonstrated by coronary arteriography that stenosis of one main branch at least of coronary artery was significant (≥70%) in patient groups while it was slight (<50%) or none in control group. Twisting and untwisting were measured by STI, and the paramaters of them were torsion, torsion rate and untwisting rate. Results The two patient groups, especially in patients with MI, had much lower parameters in torsion (6.92±3.28 vs 11.65±2.70 vs 17.16±5.42), torsion rate (45.78±19.36 vs 72.68±20.77 vs 99.51±32.13) and untwisting rate (−49.88±24.67 vs −82.91±16.37 vs −102.03±30.97) than that of control group (p<0.001). When comparing with the patients of anteroseptal and infer-posterior MI, torsion (7.82±2.03 vs 9.08±3.42 vs 4.23±2.62), torsion rate (53.76±14.85 vs 54.38±18.80 vs 30.30±19.51) and untwisting rate (−56.94±21.96 vs −59.11±25.76 vs −36.39±20.40) were significantly reduced in patients with extensive infarction of the anterior wall (p<0.05), while the differences between anteroseptal and infer-posterior MI were small. There were good correlations between torsion and LVEF, untwisting rate (r1=0.618, r2=−0.731, p<0.001 for both). Conclusion Torsion, torsion rate and untwisting rate derived by STI were decreased not only in patients with MI but also in patients with myocardial ischaemia at rest. Besides it is the infarction extent and size rather than the site to influence the twisting and untwisting in patients with MI.
Title: e0692 Assessment of left ventricular twisting and untwisting in patients with myocardial infarction and ischaemia
Description:
Objective To assess LV twisting and untwisting in patients with myocardial ischaemia at rest and myocardial infarction (MI) with different sites, searching for the value and characteristics of left ventricular twisting and untwisting in patients with CAD by speckle tracking imaging (STI).
Methods Echocardiography were performanced in 60 patients with MI (consisting of anteroseptal MI, infer-posterior MI and extensive infarction of the anterior wall), 31 patients with myocardial ischaemia and 26 control individuals who were all received coronary arteriography.
It was demonstrated by coronary arteriography that stenosis of one main branch at least of coronary artery was significant (≥70%) in patient groups while it was slight (<50%) or none in control group.
Twisting and untwisting were measured by STI, and the paramaters of them were torsion, torsion rate and untwisting rate.
Results The two patient groups, especially in patients with MI, had much lower parameters in torsion (6.
92±3.
28 vs 11.
65±2.
70 vs 17.
16±5.
42), torsion rate (45.
78±19.
36 vs 72.
68±20.
77 vs 99.
51±32.
13) and untwisting rate (−49.
88±24.
67 vs −82.
91±16.
37 vs −102.
03±30.
97) than that of control group (p<0.
001).
When comparing with the patients of anteroseptal and infer-posterior MI, torsion (7.
82±2.
03 vs 9.
08±3.
42 vs 4.
23±2.
62), torsion rate (53.
76±14.
85 vs 54.
38±18.
80 vs 30.
30±19.
51) and untwisting rate (−56.
94±21.
96 vs −59.
11±25.
76 vs −36.
39±20.
40) were significantly reduced in patients with extensive infarction of the anterior wall (p<0.
05), while the differences between anteroseptal and infer-posterior MI were small.
There were good correlations between torsion and LVEF, untwisting rate (r1=0.
618, r2=−0.
731, p<0.
001 for both).
Conclusion Torsion, torsion rate and untwisting rate derived by STI were decreased not only in patients with MI but also in patients with myocardial ischaemia at rest.
Besides it is the infarction extent and size rather than the site to influence the twisting and untwisting in patients with MI.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Surgical Management of Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Surgical Management of Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Left ventricular rupture after acute myocardial infarction occurs more often than suspected and diagnosis is rarely made before death. Left ventricular rupture has been reported to...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
GW24-e2108 Left ventricular systolic function and synchrony in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
GW24-e2108 Left ventricular systolic function and synchrony in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Objectives To assess left ventricular systolic function and synchrony, and the correlation between left ventricular systolic function, systolic synchrony, and end...
Frequency and prognostic impact of right ventricular involvement in acute myocardial infarction
Frequency and prognostic impact of right ventricular involvement in acute myocardial infarction
ObjectiveRight ventricular (RV) involvement complicating myocardial infarction (MI) is thought to impact prognosis, but potent RV markers for risk stratification are lacking. There...

Back to Top