Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Predilation in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

View through CrossRef
Background: In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), balloon predilation is frequently carried out before stenting but there is a lack of data regarding optimal balloon size and the effect of balloon size on procedural and clinical outcomes. Aims: This study compares small balloon predilation (≤50% of proximal vessel diameter) with large balloon predilation (>50% of proximal vessel diameter) in pPCI. Methods: This multicentre prospective observational study included consecutive ST elevation MI (STEMI) patients undergoing pPCI at three tertiary centres in Egypt. Demographic, clinical and angiographic data were collected for all the patients. The primary outcome was the presence of no reflow at the conclusion of the procedure and secondary outcomes included procedural complications – no reflow, dissection, abrupt vessel closure, fluoroscopy time and procedural time – and clinical outcomes – in-hospital left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis, ventricular fibrillation, stroke, death, ST-segment resolution >50% 1 hour after PCI and LVEF at discharge. Results: A total of 384 pPCI procedures were included. The small balloon group (n=222) and the large balloon group (n=162) were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics. The large balloon group had a significantly higher incidence of no reflow (n=23 [14.2%] versus n=6 [2.7%], p<0.001), procedural complications: n=31 [19.4%] versus n=10 [4.5%], p<0.001) and contrast volume (190.4 ± 40.2 ml versus 177.4 ± 29.4 ml, p=0.0003) compared to the small balloon group. ST-segment resolution >50% after PCI was more frequent in the small balloon group (n=182 [81.98%] versus n=109 [67.28%], p<0.001). Conclusion: This study suggests that using a smaller balloon size for predilation in pPCI is associated with improved coronary flow, reduced procedural complications and better ST-segment resolution.
Title: Predilation in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Description:
Background: In primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), balloon predilation is frequently carried out before stenting but there is a lack of data regarding optimal balloon size and the effect of balloon size on procedural and clinical outcomes.
Aims: This study compares small balloon predilation (≤50% of proximal vessel diameter) with large balloon predilation (>50% of proximal vessel diameter) in pPCI.
Methods: This multicentre prospective observational study included consecutive ST elevation MI (STEMI) patients undergoing pPCI at three tertiary centres in Egypt.
Demographic, clinical and angiographic data were collected for all the patients.
The primary outcome was the presence of no reflow at the conclusion of the procedure and secondary outcomes included procedural complications – no reflow, dissection, abrupt vessel closure, fluoroscopy time and procedural time – and clinical outcomes – in-hospital left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiogenic shock, stent thrombosis, ventricular fibrillation, stroke, death, ST-segment resolution >50% 1 hour after PCI and LVEF at discharge.
Results: A total of 384 pPCI procedures were included.
The small balloon group (n=222) and the large balloon group (n=162) were comparable in terms of baseline characteristics.
The large balloon group had a significantly higher incidence of no reflow (n=23 [14.
2%] versus n=6 [2.
7%], p<0.
001), procedural complications: n=31 [19.
4%] versus n=10 [4.
5%], p<0.
001) and contrast volume (190.
4 ± 40.
2 ml versus 177.
4 ± 29.
4 ml, p=0.
0003) compared to the small balloon group.
ST-segment resolution >50% after PCI was more frequent in the small balloon group (n=182 [81.
98%] versus n=109 [67.
28%], p<0.
001).
Conclusion: This study suggests that using a smaller balloon size for predilation in pPCI is associated with improved coronary flow, reduced procedural complications and better ST-segment resolution.

Related Results

Cardio protective effect of nicorandil in reperfusion injury among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Cardio protective effect of nicorandil in reperfusion injury among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of nicorandil in prevention of reperfusion injury during primary percutaneous coronary intervention by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow...
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Abstract Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions is fraught with short-term and long-term risks. Judicious use of adjunct intracoronary...
The safety of Ramadan Fasting following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The safety of Ramadan Fasting following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract Background This work aimed to assess the safety of Ramadan Fasting following the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. ...
Pengalaman Pasien ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) yang Menjalani PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Pengalaman Pasien ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) yang Menjalani PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Background: Cardiovascular disease  is one of the non-communicable diseases that has a high prevalence in the world. According to WHO (World Health Organization), data the highest ...

Back to Top