Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Practice Patterns in Office-Based Rhinology: Survey of the American Rhinologic Society
View through CrossRef
Background Recent years have witnessed significant expansion in office-based rhinology. This study assesses practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership regarding office-based rhinologic procedures. Methods A 24-item survey was disseminated to the ARS membership from March 15 to May 31, 2016. Results A total of 157 physicians (11.9%) completed the survey. Office-based rhinologic procedures were performed by 99% of respondents, with sinonasal debridements (99%), polypectomy (77%), and balloon sinus ostial dilation (56%) being the most common. During a typical month, the number of sinonasal debridements was 0–10 in 23%, 11–20 in 34%, 21–30 in 26%, and >30 in 18%. For polypectomy, 57% of the respondents utilized a microdebrider (reusable electric—24%, disposable vacuum-powered—21%, and both—12%), 36% endoscopic forceps, and 7% a combination of both. With respect to balloon ostial dilation, the frontal sinuses were the most frequently addressed (53%) followed by the maxillary (46%) and sphenoid (39%) sinuses. In-office ethmoidectomies, antrostomies, sphenoidotomies, and frontal sinusotomies without the use of the balloon were performed by 35%, 31%, 24%, and 21% of the respondents, respectively. Thirty percent of respondents used steroid-eluting sinus implants and 10% used computer-assisted surgical navigation in the office setting. Overall, 63% of respondents reported that the number of office-based rhinologic procedures they performed had increased over the last 5 years. Conclusions The present study illustrates the integration of office procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among ARS survey respondents. With ongoing technologic innovations, the scope of office-based rhinology will likely continue to expand in the years to come.
Title: Practice Patterns in Office-Based Rhinology: Survey of the American Rhinologic Society
Description:
Background Recent years have witnessed significant expansion in office-based rhinology.
This study assesses practice patterns of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) membership regarding office-based rhinologic procedures.
Methods A 24-item survey was disseminated to the ARS membership from March 15 to May 31, 2016.
Results A total of 157 physicians (11.
9%) completed the survey.
Office-based rhinologic procedures were performed by 99% of respondents, with sinonasal debridements (99%), polypectomy (77%), and balloon sinus ostial dilation (56%) being the most common.
During a typical month, the number of sinonasal debridements was 0–10 in 23%, 11–20 in 34%, 21–30 in 26%, and >30 in 18%.
For polypectomy, 57% of the respondents utilized a microdebrider (reusable electric—24%, disposable vacuum-powered—21%, and both—12%), 36% endoscopic forceps, and 7% a combination of both.
With respect to balloon ostial dilation, the frontal sinuses were the most frequently addressed (53%) followed by the maxillary (46%) and sphenoid (39%) sinuses.
In-office ethmoidectomies, antrostomies, sphenoidotomies, and frontal sinusotomies without the use of the balloon were performed by 35%, 31%, 24%, and 21% of the respondents, respectively.
Thirty percent of respondents used steroid-eluting sinus implants and 10% used computer-assisted surgical navigation in the office setting.
Overall, 63% of respondents reported that the number of office-based rhinologic procedures they performed had increased over the last 5 years.
Conclusions The present study illustrates the integration of office procedures into rhinologic clinical practice among ARS survey respondents.
With ongoing technologic innovations, the scope of office-based rhinology will likely continue to expand in the years to come.
Related Results
Rhinology on the move despite Covid-19!
Rhinology on the move despite Covid-19!
The October 2020 issue of Rhinology is a very interesting edition as it illustrates how world-wide colleagues pave the way for a better future of patients affected by nose and sinu...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
A Report on 15 Years of Clinical Negligence Claims in Rhinology
A Report on 15 Years of Clinical Negligence Claims in Rhinology
Background This study was designed to determine the characteristics of medical negligence claims in rhinology. In 2010–2011 the National Health Service (NHS) litigation bill surpas...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Performative Microforests
Performative Microforests
The design of office buildings can substantially improve the building, social, and ecological performance of office building projects. However, existing research on improving the p...
Principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office
Principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office
The article is devoted to the research of the principles of organization and activity of the European Prosecutor’s Office. The activities of the European Prosecutor’s Office are ba...
EPOS2020 and beyond
EPOS2020 and beyond
The April issue of Rhinology includes the Executive Summary of EPOS2020, highlighting the most important up-dates on disease definitions, treatment algorithms and integrated care p...
EPOS2020 and beyond
EPOS2020 and beyond
The April issue of Rhinology includes the Executive Summary of EPOS2020, highlighting the most important up-dates on disease definitions, treatment algorithms and integrated care p...

