Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Linking oral health, general health, and quality of life

View through CrossRef
The aim of this work was to assess the association among oral health, general health, and quality of life (QoL). The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐49) and the RAND‐36 were distributed amongst 118 psychology freshmen. Additionally, two single items self‐rated general health (SRGH) and self‐rated oral health (SROH) – were administered. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to evaluate differences between SRGH and SROH categories, regarding OHIP subscale scores and RAND subscale scores. More than 75% of the subjects rated their oral and general health as good. Mean OHIP scores and RAND scores indicated a relatively good oral‐ and general health‐related QoL respectively. The correlation between oral and general health was weak. Significant differences were found between SRGH categories regarding RAND subscale scores, except for the ‘role emotional’ and ‘mental health’ subscales. Significant differences were also found between SROH categories regarding OHIP subscale scores, except for the ‘psychological disability’ subscale. However, no significant differences were found between SRGH categories regarding OHIP subscale scores, or between SROH categories regarding RAND subscale scores. The findings suggest that oral health, general health, and QoL have different determinants. Furthermore, oral health and general health appear to be mostly unrelated in this seemingly healthy population. It is proposed that if no apparent disease is present, oral and general health must be regarded as separate constructs.
Title: Linking oral health, general health, and quality of life
Description:
The aim of this work was to assess the association among oral health, general health, and quality of life (QoL).
The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐49) and the RAND‐36 were distributed amongst 118 psychology freshmen.
Additionally, two single items self‐rated general health (SRGH) and self‐rated oral health (SROH) – were administered.
Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to evaluate differences between SRGH and SROH categories, regarding OHIP subscale scores and RAND subscale scores.
More than 75% of the subjects rated their oral and general health as good.
Mean OHIP scores and RAND scores indicated a relatively good oral‐ and general health‐related QoL respectively.
The correlation between oral and general health was weak.
Significant differences were found between SRGH categories regarding RAND subscale scores, except for the ‘role emotional’ and ‘mental health’ subscales.
Significant differences were also found between SROH categories regarding OHIP subscale scores, except for the ‘psychological disability’ subscale.
However, no significant differences were found between SRGH categories regarding OHIP subscale scores, or between SROH categories regarding RAND subscale scores.
The findings suggest that oral health, general health, and QoL have different determinants.
Furthermore, oral health and general health appear to be mostly unrelated in this seemingly healthy population.
It is proposed that if no apparent disease is present, oral and general health must be regarded as separate constructs.

Related Results

4.N. Workshop: Maternal Oral Health Models and Initiatives in Global and Public Health Perspectives
4.N. Workshop: Maternal Oral Health Models and Initiatives in Global and Public Health Perspectives
Abstract   Achieving and maintaining good oral health is essential for both the oral and overall health of expecting mothers and...
DENTAL STATUS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN WITH MOUTH BREATHING
DENTAL STATUS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN WITH MOUTH BREATHING
There is an increase in the number of children who have complicated nose breathing and its oral type. Preschool children are of particular concern according to clinicians. These ci...
Clinical Significance of Oral Health Related Quality of Life for Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Clinical Significance of Oral Health Related Quality of Life for Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Background: Oral cancer is relevant not only to medical practitioners but also to dentists because they have a responsibility in the early detection and prevention in the early sta...
Self-perception of childrenś oral health by their parents
Self-perception of childrenś oral health by their parents
Abstract Background Neglecting oral hygiene can lead to early tooth loss, pain, discomfort and, consequently, a great monetary i...
Functional Profiling of Saliva Microbiome is Essential for Oral Cancer Prediction
Functional Profiling of Saliva Microbiome is Essential for Oral Cancer Prediction
Abstract Background: The association between microbiome and host disease has been documented in oral cancer, one of the leading cancers worldwide. Huge efforts are made to ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...

Back to Top