Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law in Pancasila Democracy

View through CrossRef
Pancasila Democracy has consistently been a central topic in the discourse of Indonesian constitutional law. There appears to be a gap in understanding both doctrinally and in legal thought. Historically associated with the New Order government under the second period of the 1945 Constitution, Pancasila Democracy is perceived similarly in the Reformation Order under the amended 1945 Constitution of Indonesia. Although Pancasila Democracy remains a significant part of Indonesia's constitutional heritage, its foundational orientation has drastically shifted. The current democratic practices in Indonesia are seen as deviating from the original meaning and formulation of Pancasila Democracy. The Reformation Order's governance under the amended constitution reflects a liberal democratic character. There is a notable trend of integrating liberal democratic values into Pancasila Democracy, which dilutes the traditional values that have long been part of national and state life. The essence, formulation, and implementation of Pancasila Democracy have weakened. This weakening aligns with the perceived shift in Pancasila's role and status as the state foundation. The attitudes, actions, and activities of state and government administration often do not align with the consciousness of Pancasila as the state’s cornerstone. While Pancasila Democracy is a principle of Indonesian Constitutional Law, the development and practice of constitutional law in Indonesia no longer seem to be grounded in Pancasila Democracy. This article delves into the principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law within the framework of Pancasila Democracy, elucidating its meaning, formulation, and core essence.
Title: Principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law in Pancasila Democracy
Description:
Pancasila Democracy has consistently been a central topic in the discourse of Indonesian constitutional law.
There appears to be a gap in understanding both doctrinally and in legal thought.
Historically associated with the New Order government under the second period of the 1945 Constitution, Pancasila Democracy is perceived similarly in the Reformation Order under the amended 1945 Constitution of Indonesia.
Although Pancasila Democracy remains a significant part of Indonesia's constitutional heritage, its foundational orientation has drastically shifted.
The current democratic practices in Indonesia are seen as deviating from the original meaning and formulation of Pancasila Democracy.
The Reformation Order's governance under the amended constitution reflects a liberal democratic character.
There is a notable trend of integrating liberal democratic values into Pancasila Democracy, which dilutes the traditional values that have long been part of national and state life.
The essence, formulation, and implementation of Pancasila Democracy have weakened.
This weakening aligns with the perceived shift in Pancasila's role and status as the state foundation.
The attitudes, actions, and activities of state and government administration often do not align with the consciousness of Pancasila as the state’s cornerstone.
While Pancasila Democracy is a principle of Indonesian Constitutional Law, the development and practice of constitutional law in Indonesia no longer seem to be grounded in Pancasila Democracy.
This article delves into the principles of Indonesian Constitutional Law within the framework of Pancasila Democracy, elucidating its meaning, formulation, and core essence.

Related Results

BOOK REVIEW : PANCASILA DASAR NEGARA PARIPURNA
BOOK REVIEW : PANCASILA DASAR NEGARA PARIPURNA
Book Pancasila Dasar Negara Paripurna is the work of Prof. Dr. Tukiran Taniredja, MM and Prof. Dr. Suyahmo, M.Si. that was written to commemorate and make all Indonesian people awa...
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Democracy as a system has become an alternative in various social and state activities in several countries. The reason for making democracy a social and state system is because al...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus
Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Control in the Republic of Belarus
The article examines the stages of the evolution of constitutional control in the Republic of Belarus, through the prism of the development of abstract and concrete control. Charac...
REFLEKSI KETAHANAN EKONOMI PASCA PANDEMI
REFLEKSI KETAHANAN EKONOMI PASCA PANDEMI
Abstrak: Pancasila, sebagai dasar ideologi Republik Indonesia, memiliki relevansi yang mendalam dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan, termasuk ekonomi. Namun, dalam era globalisasi yang ...
Internalization of Pancasila Values Through School Cultivation During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Internalization of Pancasila Values Through School Cultivation During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Internalization of Pancasila values must be given to students. Teachers need to find creative, innovative, inspirational, and contextual ways to cultivate Pancasila values in schoo...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top