Javascript must be enabled to continue!
UK Women’s Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study
View through CrossRef
Any introduction of risk-stratification within the NHS Breast Screening Programme needs to be considered acceptable by women. We conducted interviews to explore women’s attitudes to personalised risk assessment and risk-stratified breast screening. Twenty-five UK women were purposively sampled by screening experience and socioeconomic background. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analysed using Framework Analysis. Women expressed positive intentions for personal risk assessment and willingness to receive risk feedback to provide reassurance and certainty. Women responded to risk-stratified screening scenarios in three ways: ‘Overall acceptors’ considered both high- and low-risk options acceptable as a reasonable allocation of resources to clinical need, yet acceptability was subject to specified conditions including accuracy of risk estimates and availability of support throughout the screening pathway. Others who thought ‘more is better’ only supported high-risk scenarios where increased screening was proposed. ‘Screening sceptics’ found low-risk scenarios more aligned to their screening values than high-risk screening options. Consideration of screening recommendations for other risk groups had more influence on women’s responses than screening-related harms. These findings demonstrate high, but not universal, acceptability. Support and guidance, tailored to screening values and preferences, may be required by women at all levels of risk.
Title: UK Women’s Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study
Description:
Any introduction of risk-stratification within the NHS Breast Screening Programme needs to be considered acceptable by women.
We conducted interviews to explore women’s attitudes to personalised risk assessment and risk-stratified breast screening.
Twenty-five UK women were purposively sampled by screening experience and socioeconomic background.
Interview transcripts were qualitatively analysed using Framework Analysis.
Women expressed positive intentions for personal risk assessment and willingness to receive risk feedback to provide reassurance and certainty.
Women responded to risk-stratified screening scenarios in three ways: ‘Overall acceptors’ considered both high- and low-risk options acceptable as a reasonable allocation of resources to clinical need, yet acceptability was subject to specified conditions including accuracy of risk estimates and availability of support throughout the screening pathway.
Others who thought ‘more is better’ only supported high-risk scenarios where increased screening was proposed.
‘Screening sceptics’ found low-risk scenarios more aligned to their screening values than high-risk screening options.
Consideration of screening recommendations for other risk groups had more influence on women’s responses than screening-related harms.
These findings demonstrate high, but not universal, acceptability.
Support and guidance, tailored to screening values and preferences, may be required by women at all levels of risk.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDespite a remarkable progress in the reduction of global rate of maternal mortality, cervical cancer has been identified as the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mo...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...

