Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Barth and Mediaeval Theology
View through CrossRef
Mediaeval works of theology are frequently cited throughout Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics. Yet, with the exception of Anselm of Canterbury’s Proslogion, Barth shows little interest in engaging mediaeval works first-hand in his teaching or writing. This lifelong tendency to hold mediaeval theology at a distance springs from Barth’s critical judgement—first expressed in lectures in 1922 at the University of Göttingen—that the theology of the mediaeval era is by and large a ‘theology of glory’. Although Barth came to view Anselm as an important exception to this judgement by the time of Fides quaerens intellectum (1930), the question of whether he might have found further value in other mediaeval theologians deserves consideration.
Title: Barth and Mediaeval Theology
Description:
Mediaeval works of theology are frequently cited throughout Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics.
Yet, with the exception of Anselm of Canterbury’s Proslogion, Barth shows little interest in engaging mediaeval works first-hand in his teaching or writing.
This lifelong tendency to hold mediaeval theology at a distance springs from Barth’s critical judgement—first expressed in lectures in 1922 at the University of Göttingen—that the theology of the mediaeval era is by and large a ‘theology of glory’.
Although Barth came to view Anselm as an important exception to this judgement by the time of Fides quaerens intellectum (1930), the question of whether he might have found further value in other mediaeval theologians deserves consideration.
Related Results
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and Judaism
Barth and Judaism
This chapter reflects upon the relationship between Barth’s theology and Jewish thought. Currently we inherit a certain framing of this relationship, generated by a family of Jewis...
Ascetical Theology
Ascetical Theology
Abstract
Ascetical theology is the branch of theology that studies the nature of Christian asceticism and Christian perfection. “Asceticism” comes from the G...
Barth and Patristic Theology
Barth and Patristic Theology
This chapter examines Barth’s approach to patristic theology as well as his engagement with key doctrines and councils of the patristic era. It is clear in relation to Barth’s use ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...

