Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows for curative en-bloc resection of dysplastic gastrointestinal (GI) tract lesions. However, it is associated with postoperative adverse events (AEs) such as pain, bleeding, and perforation. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising adjunct sedative for ESD under moderate sedation, offering anxiolysis and analgesia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety for use in ESD.MethodsA comprehensive systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that involved ESD utilizing dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive medication in combination with other sedatives, were included. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan using a random-effects model.ResultsEight studies were included in the final analysis. Dexmedetomidine showed no significant difference in en-bloc or complete resection rates compared to controls. Sedation and procedure times were similar between the two groups as well. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced restlessness (OR 0.15, 95% CI:0.07 to 0.29) and increased bradycardia (OR 7.15, 95% CI 3.17 to 16.11) compared to controls. Upon subgroup analysis, Dexmedetomidine plus Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine plus Midazolam, revealed the same findings regarding restlessness and bradycardia compared to controls which confirmed the adjunctive effects of Dexmedetomidine.ConclusionsDexmedetomidine as an adjunctive sedative appears safe and effective in ESD, reducing restlessness without significant adverse events. The risk of bradycardia is increased, which may be reflective of reduced physiological stress. Future studies should explore optimal dosing and compare Dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in diverse populations.
Title: Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Description:
AbstractIntroductionEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows for curative en-bloc resection of dysplastic gastrointestinal (GI) tract lesions.
However, it is associated with postoperative adverse events (AEs) such as pain, bleeding, and perforation.
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising adjunct sedative for ESD under moderate sedation, offering anxiolysis and analgesia.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety for use in ESD.
MethodsA comprehensive systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Studies that involved ESD utilizing dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive medication in combination with other sedatives, were included.
Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers.
Meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan using a random-effects model.
ResultsEight studies were included in the final analysis.
Dexmedetomidine showed no significant difference in en-bloc or complete resection rates compared to controls.
Sedation and procedure times were similar between the two groups as well.
Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced restlessness (OR 0.
15, 95% CI:0.
07 to 0.
29) and increased bradycardia (OR 7.
15, 95% CI 3.
17 to 16.
11) compared to controls.
Upon subgroup analysis, Dexmedetomidine plus Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine plus Midazolam, revealed the same findings regarding restlessness and bradycardia compared to controls which confirmed the adjunctive effects of Dexmedetomidine.
ConclusionsDexmedetomidine as an adjunctive sedative appears safe and effective in ESD, reducing restlessness without significant adverse events.
The risk of bradycardia is increased, which may be reflective of reduced physiological stress.
Future studies should explore optimal dosing and compare Dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in diverse populations.
Related Results
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagogastric junction
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for intraepithelial neoplasia of the esophagogastric junction
Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagogastric junction is the most difficult gastric and esophageal dissection procedure. No reports of endoscopic ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Incidence of Fever Associated With Dexmedetomidine in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Incidence of Fever Associated With Dexmedetomidine in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Background:
Published literature has described the temporal relationship of dexmedetomidine with elevated temperatures, but there is limited data to quantify th...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with ch...
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is increasingly being used in various surgical procedures due to its safety and effectiveness. Tympanoplasty, a common otological proced...
Sedative and Immunosuppressive Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Transplantation
Sedative and Immunosuppressive Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Transplantation
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, is used as an anti-anxiety medication. It exerts a cholinergic effect, thereby reducing the release of tumor necrosis factor alp...
Does the intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine induce bone regeneration in cranial defects at subsedative doses in rabbits?
Does the intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine induce bone regeneration in cranial defects at subsedative doses in rabbits?
Objective:
Dexmedetomidine has been shown to exert protective
and curative effects on various tissues and organs in different
pathological processes. This study a...

