Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Lekhnitskii Formalism
View through CrossRef
A two-dimensional deformation means that the displacements ui, (i= 1,2,3) or the stresses σij depend on x1 and x2 only. Among several formalisms for two-dimensional deformations of anisotropic elastic materials the Lekhnitskii (1950, 1957) formalism is the oldest, and has been extensively employed by the engineering community. The Lekhnitskii formalism essentially generalizes the Muskhelishvili (1953) approach for solving two-dimensional deformations of isotropic elastic materials. The formalism begins with the stresses and assumes that they depend on x1 and x2 only. The Stroh formalism, to be introduced in the next chapter, starts with the displacements and assumes that they depend on x1 and x2 only. Therefore the Lekhnitskii formalism is in terms of the reduced elastic compliances while the Stroh formalism is in terms of the elastic stiffnesses. It should be noted that Green and Zerna (1960) also proposed a formalism for two-dimensional deformations of anisotropic elastic materials. Their approach however is limited to materials that possess a symmetry plane at x3=0. The derivations presented below do not follow exactly those of Lekhnitskii.
Title: The Lekhnitskii Formalism
Description:
A two-dimensional deformation means that the displacements ui, (i= 1,2,3) or the stresses σij depend on x1 and x2 only.
Among several formalisms for two-dimensional deformations of anisotropic elastic materials the Lekhnitskii (1950, 1957) formalism is the oldest, and has been extensively employed by the engineering community.
The Lekhnitskii formalism essentially generalizes the Muskhelishvili (1953) approach for solving two-dimensional deformations of isotropic elastic materials.
The formalism begins with the stresses and assumes that they depend on x1 and x2 only.
The Stroh formalism, to be introduced in the next chapter, starts with the displacements and assumes that they depend on x1 and x2 only.
Therefore the Lekhnitskii formalism is in terms of the reduced elastic compliances while the Stroh formalism is in terms of the elastic stiffnesses.
It should be noted that Green and Zerna (1960) also proposed a formalism for two-dimensional deformations of anisotropic elastic materials.
Their approach however is limited to materials that possess a symmetry plane at x3=0.
The derivations presented below do not follow exactly those of Lekhnitskii.
Related Results
The Stroh Formalism
The Stroh Formalism
In this chapter we study Stroh's sextic formalism for two-dimensional deformations of an anisotropic elastic body. The Stroh formalism can be traced to the work of Eshelby, Read, a...
Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism
Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism
Musical formalism is often portrayed as the enemy of artistic freedom. Its main representative, Eduard Hanslick, is seen as a purist who, by emphasizing musical rules, aims at rest...
Rehabilitation of Formalism or “A Monument to the Scientific Error 2.0”: Viktor Shklovsky’s Zhili-byli
Rehabilitation of Formalism or “A Monument to the Scientific Error 2.0”: Viktor Shklovsky’s Zhili-byli
Abstract
The article analyzes different strategies that Viktor Shklovsky uses in his book of memoirs, Zhili-byli (1964), to re-articulate and re-introduce previously...
Three-Dimensional Deformations
Three-Dimensional Deformations
There appears to be very little study, if any, on the extension of Stroh's formalism to three-dimensional deformations of anisotropic elastic materials. In most three-dimensional p...
Helmholtz Hamiltonian Mechanics Electromagnetic Physics Gaging Generalizing Mass-Charge and Charge-Fields Gage Metrics to Quantum Relativity Gage Metrics
Helmholtz Hamiltonian Mechanics Electromagnetic Physics Gaging Generalizing Mass-Charge and Charge-Fields Gage Metrics to Quantum Relativity Gage Metrics
This article will continue ansatz gage matrix of Iyer Markoulakis Helmholtz Hamiltonian mechanics points’ fields gage to Pauli Dirac monopole particle fields ansatz gage ...
Review of Lagrangian formalism in biology: recent advances and perspectives
Review of Lagrangian formalism in biology: recent advances and perspectives
The Lagrangian formalism has attracted the attention of mathematicians and physicists for more than 250 years because of its significant roles in establishing modern theoretical ph...
Numerical Analysis of Conservative Maps: A Possible Foundation of Nonextensive Phenomena
Numerical Analysis of Conservative Maps: A Possible Foundation of Nonextensive Phenomena
We discuss the sensitivity to initial conditions and the entropy production of low-dimensional conservative maps, focusing on situations where the phase space presents complex (fra...
Influence of fractal kinetics on molecular recognition
Influence of fractal kinetics on molecular recognition
AbstractMolecular recognition is a central issue for nearly every biological mechanism. The analysis of molecular recognition to has been conducted within the framework of classica...


