Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Art Restitution

View through CrossRef
Art restitution is the return of stolen or improperly traded cultural property to its rightful owner. Critical to determining whether a work of art should be restituted is if it was subject to a transfer that was unlawful or invalid, such as a theft, expropriation, illicit trafficking, or a sale made under duress. The process of restitution therefore hinges on the provenance (history of possession and physical movement) of the object in question, along with a consideration of applicable laws that may govern ownership, import and export, and other ethical and policy frameworks. While there have been disputes over the ownership of works of art for years, the topic grew increasingly important during the 20th century, when many nations passed legislation seeking to prevent the removal of culturally significant artifacts from their borders. Artwork was restituted on a large scale following the widespread displacement of cultural property under the National Socialist regime and during World War II. The rightful ownership of archaeological material became the focus of particular scrutiny after the signing of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to facilitate claims for Native American human remains, burial goods, sacred objects, and items of cultural patrimony. It was not, however, until the turn of the 21st century that these issues came fully to the fore in the art world. In the 1990s and early 2000s, high-profile restitution claims for art stolen during the Holocaust and World War II and for antiquities looted and smuggled from their countries of origin prompted participants in the art trade to become more aware of the importance of provenance and rightful ownership. Since then, there have been increasing calls to restitute works of art removed from previously colonized areas, especially in the Global South, to their current countries of origin. Ownership claims have been facilitated by the expansion of the internet, which has made the holdings of museums, commercial galleries, and auction houses publicly accessible. The increasing transparency of the art world and the development of online databases have expedited the resolution of claims. Thanks to such tools, it has become possible more easily to register and locate lost or stolen works of art. As the field of art restitution is relatively new, the body of literature on the topic is principally from the late 20th and early 21st centuries and continues to grow rapidly.
Oxford University Press
Title: Art Restitution
Description:
Art restitution is the return of stolen or improperly traded cultural property to its rightful owner.
Critical to determining whether a work of art should be restituted is if it was subject to a transfer that was unlawful or invalid, such as a theft, expropriation, illicit trafficking, or a sale made under duress.
The process of restitution therefore hinges on the provenance (history of possession and physical movement) of the object in question, along with a consideration of applicable laws that may govern ownership, import and export, and other ethical and policy frameworks.
While there have been disputes over the ownership of works of art for years, the topic grew increasingly important during the 20th century, when many nations passed legislation seeking to prevent the removal of culturally significant artifacts from their borders.
Artwork was restituted on a large scale following the widespread displacement of cultural property under the National Socialist regime and during World War II.
The rightful ownership of archaeological material became the focus of particular scrutiny after the signing of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to facilitate claims for Native American human remains, burial goods, sacred objects, and items of cultural patrimony.
It was not, however, until the turn of the 21st century that these issues came fully to the fore in the art world.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, high-profile restitution claims for art stolen during the Holocaust and World War II and for antiquities looted and smuggled from their countries of origin prompted participants in the art trade to become more aware of the importance of provenance and rightful ownership.
Since then, there have been increasing calls to restitute works of art removed from previously colonized areas, especially in the Global South, to their current countries of origin.
Ownership claims have been facilitated by the expansion of the internet, which has made the holdings of museums, commercial galleries, and auction houses publicly accessible.
The increasing transparency of the art world and the development of online databases have expedited the resolution of claims.
Thanks to such tools, it has become possible more easily to register and locate lost or stolen works of art.
As the field of art restitution is relatively new, the body of literature on the topic is principally from the late 20th and early 21st centuries and continues to grow rapidly.

Related Results

The Attempt to Fulfill Restitution for Victims of Domestic Abandonment Crimes
The Attempt to Fulfill Restitution for Victims of Domestic Abandonment Crimes
This article aims to analyze the legal protection for victims of domestic abandonment through restitution fulfillment. It is because imprisonment in the case of domestic abandonmen...
Exploring the benefits and challenges of land restitution at Qhubekani-Mnqobokazi community land.
Exploring the benefits and challenges of land restitution at Qhubekani-Mnqobokazi community land.
In 1994, the democratic government of South Africa introduced the Land Reform Programme, which aimed to redress the historical imbalances. The Land Reform Programme is designed to ...
Land Reform in South Africa: The Conversation That Never Took Place
Land Reform in South Africa: The Conversation That Never Took Place
After independence, South Africa embarked on a land reform programme that is meant to redress the highly inequitable land ownership which resulted from Apartheid. The programme com...
Temporaliser la photographie : Marker, Varda, Wenders–Salgado
Temporaliser la photographie : Marker, Varda, Wenders–Salgado
À travers trois films qui reposent sur des photographies — Si j’avais quatre dromadaires de Chris Marker (1966), Ulysse d’Agnès Varda (1982) et Le sel de la Terre de Wim Wenders et...
Pemenuhan Restitusi Bagi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat Ditinjau Melalui Perspektif Viktimologi
Pemenuhan Restitusi Bagi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat Ditinjau Melalui Perspektif Viktimologi
Restitution for child victims of serious criminal abuse is a human right guaranteed under the legislation. Indonesia Child Protection Law explicitly contains provisions regarding s...
Regulation Of The Right Of Restitution For Children As Victims Of Criminal Acts
Regulation Of The Right Of Restitution For Children As Victims Of Criminal Acts
Victims of criminal acts only get inner satisfaction from the punishment imposed on the perpetrators but do not get anything that has a direct impact on them. The codified concept ...
The Measurements of Boundary Kin in an Inheritance Bubble in Romania
The Measurements of Boundary Kin in an Inheritance Bubble in Romania
Struggles between current tenants and the heirs of former owners over property rights in post-socialist housing restitution in Romania often unfold through kinship measurements. I ...

Back to Top