Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Art Restitution
View through CrossRef
Art restitution is the return of stolen or improperly traded cultural property to its rightful owner. Critical to determining whether a work of art should be restituted is if it was subject to a transfer that was unlawful or invalid, such as a theft, expropriation, illicit trafficking, or a sale made under duress. The process of restitution therefore hinges on the provenance (history of possession and physical movement) of the object in question, along with a consideration of applicable laws that may govern ownership, import and export, and other ethical and policy frameworks. While there have been disputes over the ownership of works of art for years, the topic grew increasingly important during the 20th century, when many nations passed legislation seeking to prevent the removal of culturally significant artifacts from their borders. Artwork was restituted on a large scale following the widespread displacement of cultural property under the National Socialist regime and during World War II. The rightful ownership of archaeological material became the focus of particular scrutiny after the signing of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to facilitate claims for Native American human remains, burial goods, sacred objects, and items of cultural patrimony. It was not, however, until the turn of the 21st century that these issues came fully to the fore in the art world. In the 1990s and early 2000s, high-profile restitution claims for art stolen during the Holocaust and World War II and for antiquities looted and smuggled from their countries of origin prompted participants in the art trade to become more aware of the importance of provenance and rightful ownership. Since then, there have been increasing calls to restitute works of art removed from previously colonized areas, especially in the Global South, to their current countries of origin. Ownership claims have been facilitated by the expansion of the internet, which has made the holdings of museums, commercial galleries, and auction houses publicly accessible. The increasing transparency of the art world and the development of online databases have expedited the resolution of claims. Thanks to such tools, it has become possible more easily to register and locate lost or stolen works of art. As the field of art restitution is relatively new, the body of literature on the topic is principally from the late 20th and early 21st centuries and continues to grow rapidly.
Title: Art Restitution
Description:
Art restitution is the return of stolen or improperly traded cultural property to its rightful owner.
Critical to determining whether a work of art should be restituted is if it was subject to a transfer that was unlawful or invalid, such as a theft, expropriation, illicit trafficking, or a sale made under duress.
The process of restitution therefore hinges on the provenance (history of possession and physical movement) of the object in question, along with a consideration of applicable laws that may govern ownership, import and export, and other ethical and policy frameworks.
While there have been disputes over the ownership of works of art for years, the topic grew increasingly important during the 20th century, when many nations passed legislation seeking to prevent the removal of culturally significant artifacts from their borders.
Artwork was restituted on a large scale following the widespread displacement of cultural property under the National Socialist regime and during World War II.
The rightful ownership of archaeological material became the focus of particular scrutiny after the signing of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.
In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to facilitate claims for Native American human remains, burial goods, sacred objects, and items of cultural patrimony.
It was not, however, until the turn of the 21st century that these issues came fully to the fore in the art world.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, high-profile restitution claims for art stolen during the Holocaust and World War II and for antiquities looted and smuggled from their countries of origin prompted participants in the art trade to become more aware of the importance of provenance and rightful ownership.
Since then, there have been increasing calls to restitute works of art removed from previously colonized areas, especially in the Global South, to their current countries of origin.
Ownership claims have been facilitated by the expansion of the internet, which has made the holdings of museums, commercial galleries, and auction houses publicly accessible.
The increasing transparency of the art world and the development of online databases have expedited the resolution of claims.
Thanks to such tools, it has become possible more easily to register and locate lost or stolen works of art.
As the field of art restitution is relatively new, the body of literature on the topic is principally from the late 20th and early 21st centuries and continues to grow rapidly.
Related Results
Sotheby's Restitution Symposium: Sotheby's Amsterdam, The Netherlands (January 30, 2008)
Sotheby's Restitution Symposium: Sotheby's Amsterdam, The Netherlands (January 30, 2008)
This symposium on provenance research and the restitution of Nazi-looted art was organized by the auction house Sotheby's and sponsored by the Muggenthaler International Genealogic...
Stalin's Decrees and Soviet Trophy Brigades: Compensation, Restitution in Kind, or “Trophies” of War?
Stalin's Decrees and Soviet Trophy Brigades: Compensation, Restitution in Kind, or “Trophies” of War?
AbstractThe article is dedicated to the official decrees issued by Joseph Stalin in 1945 ordering the Soviet removal of cultural property from Eastern European and German territori...
Skin of the Dog
Skin of the Dog
This chapter argues that the nature and status of dogs as defined by law are crucial to understanding the limits of restitution and the uneven application of remedy to persons who ...
Illicit antiquities and international litigation–the Turkish experience
Illicit antiquities and international litigation–the Turkish experience
In March, we discussed the founding of the Illicit Antiquities Research Centre (IARC) at the McDonald Institute in Cambridge (ANTIQUITY72: 4–5). Here we publish a contribution towa...
Per Ravenna trecentesca: nuove proposte per l’assetto architettonico di Santa Maria in Porto Fuori
Per Ravenna trecentesca: nuove proposte per l’assetto architettonico di Santa Maria in Porto Fuori
Abstract
This contribution intends to draw attention to one of the most significant monuments of medieval Ravenna: the church of Santa Maria in Porto Fuori, which wa...
The Hot Sun and the Mad Moon: Hiroshima in South African Literature
The Hot Sun and the Mad Moon: Hiroshima in South African Literature
In 1926 a new shipping route was established between Durban and Osaka, on which Laurens van der Post and William Plomer, fresh from their collaboration as writers for the literary ...
The Emblem Texts at Tådene, Västergötland
The Emblem Texts at Tådene, Västergötland
Abstract
The church of Tådene in Västergötland is home to a series of painted panels dating from the early 1700s. Before their restitution to the church in the 1960s...
La réutilisation des éléments d'architecture du temple haut du sanctuaire de Zeus à Gerasa à la période byzantine
La réutilisation des éléments d'architecture du temple haut du sanctuaire de Zeus à Gerasa à la période byzantine
À travers l'exemple du temple haut du sanctuaire de Zeus, on examine ici les conditions de la réutilisation des éléments d'architecture des sanctuaires romains de Gerasa à la pério...