Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bruno Latour: Translating the Human
View through CrossRef
Chapter 6 considers the figure of the human that emerges in Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence and his ‘Facing Gaia’ lectures. Latour neither repeats nor discards previous notions of humanity but translates them in a gesture that can be traced all the way back to his doctoral work on the theologian of demythologisation Rudolf Bultmann. In his attempts to elaborate a figure of the human that follows neither the emancipation narrative nor the structure of modernity, Latour (like Serres) develops a multi-modal approach. The human is an amalgam of multiple modes of existence and cannot be isolated within any single mode. Latour also avoids the problems inherent in a host capacity approach by distributing both capacities and substance across human and nonhuman actors in unatomisable collectivities. Whereas the host capacity and host substance approaches seek to understand the human by looking within, Latour insists that the human only becomes comprehensible when we look outside and around. His 2013 Gifford Lectures both develop and challenge themes from the Modes of Existence project, reasserting the centrality of the human now in terms of a non-modern anthropos defined by its limits and its multiple attachments to the world.
Title: Bruno Latour: Translating the Human
Description:
Chapter 6 considers the figure of the human that emerges in Bruno Latour’s An Inquiry into Modes of Existence and his ‘Facing Gaia’ lectures.
Latour neither repeats nor discards previous notions of humanity but translates them in a gesture that can be traced all the way back to his doctoral work on the theologian of demythologisation Rudolf Bultmann.
In his attempts to elaborate a figure of the human that follows neither the emancipation narrative nor the structure of modernity, Latour (like Serres) develops a multi-modal approach.
The human is an amalgam of multiple modes of existence and cannot be isolated within any single mode.
Latour also avoids the problems inherent in a host capacity approach by distributing both capacities and substance across human and nonhuman actors in unatomisable collectivities.
Whereas the host capacity and host substance approaches seek to understand the human by looking within, Latour insists that the human only becomes comprehensible when we look outside and around.
His 2013 Gifford Lectures both develop and challenge themes from the Modes of Existence project, reasserting the centrality of the human now in terms of a non-modern anthropos defined by its limits and its multiple attachments to the world.
Related Results
BRUNO LATOUR’S ONTOLOGY
BRUNO LATOUR’S ONTOLOGY
The article concerns the material developed by the French sociologist and philosopher Bruno Latour. On the example of a number of works belonging to the field of researches called ...
A IMPORTÂNCIA DE BRUNO LATOUR PARA A FILOSOFIA - TEXTO ORIGINAL POR GRAHAM HARMAN
A IMPORTÂNCIA DE BRUNO LATOUR PARA A FILOSOFIA - TEXTO ORIGINAL POR GRAHAM HARMAN
<p>Poucos pensadores contemporâneos tem se deparado com um destino tão estranho quanto Bruno Latour. Em certas partes do mundo acadêmico, ele é um reconhecido popstar. Sua te...
A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is no Longer Required for Research Purposes: A Debate Between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller
A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is no Longer Required for Research Purposes: A Debate Between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller
The second International Knowledge and Discourse Conference, held at the University of Hong Kong in June 2002, was the forum for the long-awaited debate between Bruno Latour and St...
From the Conseil d’État to Gaia: Bruno Latour on Law, Surfaces and Depth
From the Conseil d’État to Gaia: Bruno Latour on Law, Surfaces and Depth
This chapter artfully scans the surface of
La fabrique du droit
, ably summarising that book’s arguments and drawing a series of provocative...
Gaia and Religious Pluralism in Bruno Latour’s ‘New-Materialism’
Gaia and Religious Pluralism in Bruno Latour’s ‘New-Materialism’
In his works on ecological philosophy, Bruno Latour develops an interesting perspective on religion and pluralism. He proposes a new worldview, in which religion is reinterpreted i...
Der Praxis- und Handlungsbegriff im Vergleich. Eine Gegenüberstellung der Sozialtheorien von Pierre Bourdieu und Bruno Latour
Der Praxis- und Handlungsbegriff im Vergleich. Eine Gegenüberstellung der Sozialtheorien von Pierre Bourdieu und Bruno Latour
Dieser Artikel untersucht die unterschiedlichen Konzeptionen von Handlung und Praxis bei den französischen Soziologen Pierre Bourdieu und Bruno Latour. Während Bourdieu mit seiner ...
Joyce...Bruno...Ulysses
Joyce...Bruno...Ulysses
Abstract:Giordano Bruno has been a philosopher traditionally connected to James Joyce. Nevertheless, Bruno’s influence has been associated to Joyce’s last and enigmatic work, Finne...
The World as Laboratory and Parliament – Bruno Latour's Political Ecology as Emerging from Science Studies Die Welt als Labor und Versammlungsort – Bruno Latours politische Ökologie aus dem Geiste der Wissenschaftsforschung
The World as Laboratory and Parliament – Bruno Latour's Political Ecology as Emerging from Science Studies Die Welt als Labor und Versammlungsort – Bruno Latours politische Ökologie aus dem Geiste der Wissenschaftsforschung
The historical and philosophical study of science and technology has undergone significant change in the last 20 years. The new goal of this approach is to focus on practices and t...

