Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Poaching creates ecological traps within an iconic protected area

View through CrossRef
AbstractEcological traps occur when areas preferentially selected by a species harbour an unknown increased mortality risk or reduced fitness for the individuals utilizing them. If animals continue to utilize these habitats, rapid declines may result that threaten the persistence of the population. Both black and white rhinoceroses are plagued by severe, targeted rhino poaching in South Africa that may have population and species‐level consequences in the long term. Poaching can rapidly increase mortality and may create habitats that function as ecological traps for protected populations. We used spatially explicit data of live rhino and poached rhino carcasses in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to define high‐ and low‐risk states for both black and white rhino species. The proportion of area functioning as ecological trap was similar for both species (black: 37.73%, white: 35.51%), while the proportion of safe harbour was considerably lower for black rhino (black rhino: 32.01%, white rhino: 44.74%). Species‐specific risk areas were condensed into management categories that reflect the actions most likely to be effective for overall rhino protection in those areas. ‘Threat’ area, representing ecological traps for both species, comprised 32.48% of southern Kruger; this represents the highest priority for anti‐poaching interventions. A further 31.03% was identified as ‘haven’, representing safe harbours for both species, which may benefit most from continued rhino monitoring and surveillance. Using these categories, authorities can prioritize the distribution of limited resources and tailor anti‐poaching and biological management actions according to the needs of each area for the concurrent protection of both rhino species. This work illustrates how the conservation of multiple species or taxa within a system can be simultaneously prioritized in vast areas where resources and/or capacity may be insufficient to undertake species‐specific approaches.
Title: Poaching creates ecological traps within an iconic protected area
Description:
AbstractEcological traps occur when areas preferentially selected by a species harbour an unknown increased mortality risk or reduced fitness for the individuals utilizing them.
If animals continue to utilize these habitats, rapid declines may result that threaten the persistence of the population.
Both black and white rhinoceroses are plagued by severe, targeted rhino poaching in South Africa that may have population and species‐level consequences in the long term.
Poaching can rapidly increase mortality and may create habitats that function as ecological traps for protected populations.
We used spatially explicit data of live rhino and poached rhino carcasses in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to define high‐ and low‐risk states for both black and white rhino species.
The proportion of area functioning as ecological trap was similar for both species (black: 37.
73%, white: 35.
51%), while the proportion of safe harbour was considerably lower for black rhino (black rhino: 32.
01%, white rhino: 44.
74%).
Species‐specific risk areas were condensed into management categories that reflect the actions most likely to be effective for overall rhino protection in those areas.
‘Threat’ area, representing ecological traps for both species, comprised 32.
48% of southern Kruger; this represents the highest priority for anti‐poaching interventions.
A further 31.
03% was identified as ‘haven’, representing safe harbours for both species, which may benefit most from continued rhino monitoring and surveillance.
Using these categories, authorities can prioritize the distribution of limited resources and tailor anti‐poaching and biological management actions according to the needs of each area for the concurrent protection of both rhino species.
This work illustrates how the conservation of multiple species or taxa within a system can be simultaneously prioritized in vast areas where resources and/or capacity may be insufficient to undertake species‐specific approaches.

Related Results

A tale of three villages: choosing an effective method for assessing poaching levels in western Serengeti, Tanzania
A tale of three villages: choosing an effective method for assessing poaching levels in western Serengeti, Tanzania
AbstractPoaching for bushmeat is a major problem for conservation of wildlife populations in many parts of Africa, including the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. However, the sever...
Identifying, Bypassing, and Avoiding Gas Traps in Horizontal Wells
Identifying, Bypassing, and Avoiding Gas Traps in Horizontal Wells
Abstract When dealing with horizontal wells in gas reservoirs with low bottomhole pressure, it is important to avoid traps –– that is, S-shaped portions of the wellb...
Allure of the Abroad: Tiffany & Co., Its Cultural Influence, and Consumers
Allure of the Abroad: Tiffany & Co., Its Cultural Influence, and Consumers
Introduction Tiffany and Co. is an American luxury jewellery and specialty retailer with its headquarters in New York City. Each piece of jewellery, symbolically packaged in a blue...
PROSPECTIVE MODELS OF THE CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGICAL NETWORK OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF CHORTKIV DISTRICT
PROSPECTIVE MODELS OF THE CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGICAL NETWORK OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF CHORTKIV DISTRICT
In the publication, the main attention is drawn to the improvement of the functional and spatial structure of the protected and ecological networks of the administrative district (...
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Abstract Under the influence of natural factors and human activities, the ecological environment functions in the source region of the Yellow River in China have been degra...
PUNISHING PERLEMOEN* POACHING – DEVELOPMENTS BOTH RECENT AND POSSIBLY FUTURE?
PUNISHING PERLEMOEN* POACHING – DEVELOPMENTS BOTH RECENT AND POSSIBLY FUTURE?
The problems related to curbing the poaching of abalone are legion. First, abalone is an easily accessible target. Sedentary in nature, occurring in shallow subtidal kelp beds rare...

Back to Top