Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Gotthard Günthers Fichte-Interpretation

View through CrossRef
The essay reconstructs Gotthard Günther’s interpretation of Fichte’s philosophy. The starting point of this reconstruction are Günther’s investigations into a formal logic of reflection and their approaches in German idealism. Particular attention is given to the volitional aspect of Günther’s logic. According to Günther, Fichte is the first philosopher clearly to see and to explain the duality of reflection posed by Kant as a problem. According to Günther, the second important contribution of Fichte is the insight that thinking in the double reflection is no longer a passive reflection but an action. Despite these two starting points, Fichte does not transcend the framework of classical thought. This is because of his identification of thinking and acting or willing. Their separation is finally accomplished only in Schelling’s late philosophy, in which a change of theme from being to action takes place. This allows the separation of form and content in the double reflection as well. Günther’s introduction of the will into logic is based on the distinction between logical value and ontological location. The latter is, as a floating exchange relation, an indeterminate vacancy which can be occupied by logical values. This assignment is accomplished, which represents Günther’s transference of the Fichtean theory of positing to the theory of trans-classical technique, no longer by thinking, but by way of technical construction.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Gotthard Günthers Fichte-Interpretation
Description:
The essay reconstructs Gotthard Günther’s interpretation of Fichte’s philosophy.
The starting point of this reconstruction are Günther’s investigations into a formal logic of reflection and their approaches in German idealism.
Particular attention is given to the volitional aspect of Günther’s logic.
According to Günther, Fichte is the first philosopher clearly to see and to explain the duality of reflection posed by Kant as a problem.
According to Günther, the second important contribution of Fichte is the insight that thinking in the double reflection is no longer a passive reflection but an action.
Despite these two starting points, Fichte does not transcend the framework of classical thought.
This is because of his identification of thinking and acting or willing.
Their separation is finally accomplished only in Schelling’s late philosophy, in which a change of theme from being to action takes place.
This allows the separation of form and content in the double reflection as well.
Günther’s introduction of the will into logic is based on the distinction between logical value and ontological location.
The latter is, as a floating exchange relation, an indeterminate vacancy which can be occupied by logical values.
This assignment is accomplished, which represents Günther’s transference of the Fichtean theory of positing to the theory of trans-classical technique, no longer by thinking, but by way of technical construction.

Related Results

Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (b. 1762–d. 1814) is the first representative of what has been called “German idealism.” He precedes both Schelling, who was considered his disciple until th...
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte developed Kant’s Critical philosophy into a system of his own, which he named ‘Theory of Science’ or Wissenschaftslehre. Though Fichte continued to revise this system until ...
Grouting works at the Gotthard Base Tunnel / Injektionsmaßnahmen am Gotthard‐Basistunnel
Grouting works at the Gotthard Base Tunnel / Injektionsmaßnahmen am Gotthard‐Basistunnel
AbstractIn long, deep tunnels, it is not possible to completely investigate the ground conditions along the future alignment in advance. Unexpected ground conditions and fault zone...
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
This paper addresses some of the figurative properties of Fichte’s philosophical discourse. In many texts from the so-called Spätphilosophie the WL is depicted as an »image of know...
DE VOLTA A KANT? A FENOMENOLOGIA TRANSCENDENTAL TARDIA DE FICHTE
DE VOLTA A KANT? A FENOMENOLOGIA TRANSCENDENTAL TARDIA DE FICHTE
Na literatura secundária sobre a obra tardia de Johann Gottlieb Fichte, pelo menos não é incomum atribuir ao Fichte dessa fase um retorno a Immanuel Kant.1 Como um filho que se per...
Fichte ve Yunus Emre'de Arı Ben’in İfadesi
Fichte ve Yunus Emre'de Arı Ben’in İfadesi
Bu çalışma Fichte ve Yunus Emre’de Arı Ben’in ele alınış ve ifade ediliş tarzlarındaki ortak temalara yer vermektedir. Bu amaçla çalışma, Batı zihin dünyasında Descartes’le başlaya...
A RESENHA DE ENESIDEMO E O PRINCÍPIO DA WISSENSCHAFTSLEHRE DE FICHTE
A RESENHA DE ENESIDEMO E O PRINCÍPIO DA WISSENSCHAFTSLEHRE DE FICHTE
A segunda metade do século XVIII foi marcada por algumas das mais significativas revoluções da história ocidental. Assim como nas artes e na produção científica, a filosofia aprese...
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb
AbstractJohann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) is one of the founders of the philosophical movement known as German idealism. He is most often discussed as a transitional figure betwee...

Back to Top