Javascript must be enabled to continue!
806. MINIMALLY INVASIVE REVISION FUNDOPLICATION, IS IT SAFE AND FEASIBLE? SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic fundoplication has become standard of care for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, large and symptomatic hiatal hernia. Failure rate for laparoscopic fundoplication was between 2 to 17%. Doing Revisional Antireflux surgery is technically difficult. Our aim is to analyse symptomatic improvement post surgery, safety and durability of procedure in patients who underwent revision fundoplication at our centre
Patients and Methods
22 patients underwent Minimally invasive revision fundoplication between January 2019 to January 2022 were taken into study, of them 12 gentlemen and 10 women were noted. Modified DeMeester score was calculated in all patients preoperatively and on 6 months follow up.
Results
All patients underwent primary surgery laparoscopically. 14 patients (63.6%)had recurrent reflux symptoms and 8 patients (36.3%) had severe dysphagia. Revision fundoplication was done laparoscopically in 20 patients and 2 patients Robotic surgery was done. Intraoperatively 11 patients had wrap migration, 8 patients had tight wrap, 3 patients had twist of wrap. In the re-do anti-reflux surgery (ARS) procedure, floppy Nissen fundoplication was performed in 86.4% of the patients, which amounts to 19 patients., and 3 patient underwent a 270-degree Toupet fundoplication. In 2 patients, additional composite mesh reinforcement was employed. 13.6 % of patients had intraoperative complications, 9.09 % of patients had pleural injury, 4.7 % had intraoperative bleeding, 9.09% of patients had gallstone disease, for which cholecystectomy was done. All patients anterior and posterior vagus identified and preserved. On follow up 80% of patients had resolution of symptoms, 18% needed intermittent PPI. At a median follow up of 18 months, no surgical failure was noted in endoscopy.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure when operated in a high volume centre by an expert surgeon.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 806. MINIMALLY INVASIVE REVISION FUNDOPLICATION, IS IT SAFE AND FEASIBLE? SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Description:
Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic fundoplication has become standard of care for patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, large and symptomatic hiatal hernia.
Failure rate for laparoscopic fundoplication was between 2 to 17%.
Doing Revisional Antireflux surgery is technically difficult.
Our aim is to analyse symptomatic improvement post surgery, safety and durability of procedure in patients who underwent revision fundoplication at our centre
Patients and Methods
22 patients underwent Minimally invasive revision fundoplication between January 2019 to January 2022 were taken into study, of them 12 gentlemen and 10 women were noted.
Modified DeMeester score was calculated in all patients preoperatively and on 6 months follow up.
Results
All patients underwent primary surgery laparoscopically.
14 patients (63.
6%)had recurrent reflux symptoms and 8 patients (36.
3%) had severe dysphagia.
Revision fundoplication was done laparoscopically in 20 patients and 2 patients Robotic surgery was done.
Intraoperatively 11 patients had wrap migration, 8 patients had tight wrap, 3 patients had twist of wrap.
In the re-do anti-reflux surgery (ARS) procedure, floppy Nissen fundoplication was performed in 86.
4% of the patients, which amounts to 19 patients.
, and 3 patient underwent a 270-degree Toupet fundoplication.
In 2 patients, additional composite mesh reinforcement was employed.
13.
6 % of patients had intraoperative complications, 9.
09 % of patients had pleural injury, 4.
7 % had intraoperative bleeding, 9.
09% of patients had gallstone disease, for which cholecystectomy was done.
All patients anterior and posterior vagus identified and preserved.
On follow up 80% of patients had resolution of symptoms, 18% needed intermittent PPI.
At a median follow up of 18 months, no surgical failure was noted in endoscopy.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure when operated in a high volume centre by an expert surgeon.
Related Results
802 PERIOPERATIVE AND SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES FOR PRIMARY ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: FUNDOPLICATION VS. RNY RECONSTRUCTION
802 PERIOPERATIVE AND SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES FOR PRIMARY ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: FUNDOPLICATION VS. RNY RECONSTRUCTION
Abstract
Laparoscopic fundoplication is the gold standard for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, RN...
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive technique for esophagectomy has emerged as the standard of care for resectable esophageal...
Lap. Nissen Fundoplication leads to better respiratory Symptom Control than Toupet in the long-term of 20 years
Lap. Nissen Fundoplication leads to better respiratory Symptom Control than Toupet in the long-term of 20 years
Abstract
Introduction:
Since we are performing anti-reflux surgery for thirty years, it was worth re-examining our patients on the long-term to enlarge the body of evidence...
614. LAPAROSCOPIC RE DO FUNDOPLICATION
614. LAPAROSCOPIC RE DO FUNDOPLICATION
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic fundoplication though an effective form of therapy for patients with refractory gastroesophagea...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Minimally Invasive vs Open Akin Osteotomy
Minimally Invasive vs Open Akin Osteotomy
Background: Minimally invasive techniques of Akin osteotomy have grown in popularity, as early results suggest faster recovery, earlier return to work, and minimized wound healing ...
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Reduction Combined With Medial and External Fixation in the Treatment of Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Reduction Combined With Medial and External Fixation in the Treatment of Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures
Abstract
BackgroundComparison of percutaneous minimally invasive replacement joint inside external fixation technique and tarsal sinus approach to treat Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ cli...
Introduction: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery video supplement
Introduction: Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery video supplement
This video supplement of Neurosurgery Focus is devoted to minimally invasive spine surgery. Minimally invasive spine surgery has gained popularity amongst patients and physicians o...


